Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jamison Foundation

$480k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$1.0MHealth$420kArts & Culture$243kYouth Development$182kReligion$120kHuman Services$55kCrime & Legal$50kPhilanthropy$22kOther$0
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $428k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$861
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CEDARS-SINAI$200,000
THE CENTER OF EARLY EDUCATION$125,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$52,600
HARVARD WESTLAKE SCHOOL$50,000
KOREAN AMERICAN EDUCATION RESEARCH$20,000
KOREAN AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION$12,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$10,000
CENTER THEATRE GROUP$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KOREA TOWN SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%KOREA TOWN SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 13 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$1.8M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+83%

Still filing today

54%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $409k · revenue +3%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $400k · revenue +25%
  • HS
    HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2023 · $209k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • MA
    MUSEUM ASSOCIATESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $45k · revenue +56%
  • VISION TO LEARNgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +250%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
2
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
3
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
4
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
5
Ucla Alumni Association

The mission of the ucla alumni association is to enrich the lives of alumni and involve them in the future of ucla.

Education
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
10
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
11
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
12
Los Angeles County Medical Association

To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Early Education; the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $409,200 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATIONHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $208,830 · EducationHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOLUCLA FOUNDATION: $167,800 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONKOREAN AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER: $140,000 · EducationKOREAN AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER+1 more: $9,600 · EducationUSC CARUSO CATHOLIC CENTER: $120,000 · OtherUSC CARUSO CATHOLIC CE…USC KOREAN STUDIES INSTITUTE: $109,667 · OtherUSC KOREAN STUDIES INS…USC JAMISON FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP: $100,000 · OtherUSC JAMISON FOUNDATION…ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE: $50,000 · OtherASIAN AMERICANS ADVANC…KAFS CENTER: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $30,300 · Other+4 moreCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $400,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL C…+2 more: $20,000 · HealthKOREAN AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION: $182,000 · Recreation & SportsKOREAN AM…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $45,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureKOREAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $21,631 · PhilanthropyKOREA TOWN SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $18,000 · Human Services
Education$935,430Other$429,967Health$420,000Recreation & Sports$182,000Arts & Culture$133,000Philanthropy$21,631Human Services$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $409,200 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $400,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $208,830 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION: $182,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $167,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER: $140,000 over 7y, 86% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC: $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOREAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $21,631 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKOREA TOWN SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $18,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $9,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL OF KOREAN AMERICANS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KOREA TOWN SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL OF KOREAN AMERICANS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jamison Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jamison Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jamison’s filings →

    More from the funding graph