Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

James W Carell Charitable Trust Co Cumberland Trust Company

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of JAMES W CARELL CHARITABLE TRUST CO CUMBERLAND TRUST COMPANY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $257k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $501k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FED BY FAITH$275,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$170,000
TEMPLETON ACADEMY$75,000
NASHVILLE GIVES HOPE$75,000
MAKE A WISH$75,000
FRIENDS OF WALKERS PEACE CENTER$55,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENN$50,500
SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER$25,000
NASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION$25,000
ONE GENERATION AWAY$25,000
NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION$25,000
DISMAS HOUSE$23,000
V FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$20,000
FRIENDS OF WARNER PARKS$20,000
HARPETH CONSERVANCY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES: $3k → 4%PROJECT REDESIGN: $7k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $50k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $36k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

CT
CA
CO
TN
NC
SC
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 41 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
19

Total granted

$3.0M
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+52%

Still filing today

61%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FED BY FAITH DBA BY FAITH FARM
    5× · 2021–2025 · $496k · revenue +725% · 68% of their budget
  • SB
    SAINT BERNARD ACADEMY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $166k · revenue +27%
  • CT
    CHANGE THE STARS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $162k · revenue ×171

Funded once

  • E2
    EQUIP 2022
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • HO
    HANDS ON NASHVILLE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
2
New Hope Academy

Christ-centered school educating children of diverse racial & socioeconomic backgrounds by establishing a biblical worldview & preparing each child to flourish academically, emotionally, socially & spiritually.

Education
3
Kings Academy Nashville

King's academy is a pre-k-8th grade independent christian school in nashville, tennessee, providing a classically inspired education to a racially and socioeconomically balanced student body.

Education
4
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
5
Equally Created

To ensure accessible early childhood education for all families in the greater nashville area.

Human Services
6
Nashville Inner City Ministry Inc

Nashville inner city ministry is a christ-centered community organization dedicated to empowering the spiritual, educational and vocational development of at-risk youth and their families.

7
Needlink Nashville

Provide needy families and individuals with rent and utilities assistance in order to prevent their eviction or termination of utility services. also provide food and other assistance to needy families and individuals.

8
Nashville Zoo Inc

In fulfillment of our mission to inspire a culture of understanding and discovery of our natural world through conservation, innovation and leadership, our goal is to build a first class zoo for middle tennessee and to develop a facility…

Animals
9
Lead Public Schools Inc

Lead public schools exists to prepare all our students with the knowledge and skills to succeed in college and in life.

Education
10
Nashville Cares

Nashville cares exists to end the hiv epidemic, promote comprehensive sexual health and end sexual health stigmatization and discrimination through prevention, education, treatment, support, advocacy, and strategic partnership.

Health
11
Greenways for Nashville Inc

Greenways for nashville promotes, supports, and enhances a system of greenways and open space in nashville and davidson county.

Recreation & Sports
12
The Village At Glencliff

The village at glencliff's mission is to provide a healing community for medically vulnerable, unhoused nashvillians to safely recover, stabilize their lives, and imagine their futures.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Snooty Giggles Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Advocacy and Grantmaking Or…Addiction Recovery & Reentr…Nashville Parks & Preservat…Animal Rescue and Shelter S…Nashville Public Education …Youth Sports LeaguesEarly Childhood Education C…Affordable Senior HousingChristian K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%6%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr12%18%35–55yr14%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%25%<5yr15%9%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr12%18%35–55yr14%9%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 25% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
12%
841/6,775

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
25/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $381,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKMAKE A WISH — $212,500 · OtherMAKE A WISHCROSS ROAD CAMPUS — $174,550 · OtherCROSS ROAD CAMPUSTEMPLETON ACADEMY — $75,000 · OtherCENTER FOR LIVING AND LEARNING INC — $75,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC — $79,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $70,500 · OtherHARPETH CONSERVANCY — $70,000 · Other+39 more — $856,381 · Other+39 moreFED BY FAITH DBA BY FAITH FARM — $496,050 · Food & NutritionFED BY FAITH DBA …+1 more — $15,000 · Food & NutritionSAINT BERNARD ACADEMY — $165,860 · EducationMONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE — $30,500 · EducationBook Em — $25,000 · Education+3 more — $8,500 · EducationCHANGE THE STARS INC — $161,500 · InternationalNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION — $114,360 · Housing & ShelterNASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC — $42,590 · Housing & ShelterAmputee Blade Runners — $106,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT REDESIGN INC — $40,950 · Human Services+1 more — $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $122,135 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Health+1 more — $2,500 · Health
Other$1,993,931Food & Nutrition$511,050Education$229,860International$161,500Housing & Shelter$156,950Human Services$149,950Health$144,635

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFED BY FAITH DBA BY FAITH FARM — $496,050 over 5y, 68% of budgetSAINT BERNARD ACADEMY — $165,860 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHANGE THE STARS INC — $161,500 over 8y, 15% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $122,135 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION — $114,360 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC — $79,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCENTER FOR LIVING AND LEARNING INC — $75,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $70,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARPETH CONSERVANCY — $70,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetONE GENERATION AWAY — $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC — $58,690 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN AND MUSEUM OF ART — $58,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC — $42,590 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT REDESIGN INC — $40,950 over 8y, 9.0% of budgetNASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY — $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSNOOTY GIGGLES DOG RESCUE — $31,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE — $30,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBook Em — $25,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetDISMAS INC — $24,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ON NASHVILLE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPORTLAND PAY IT FORWARD — $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetROCKETOWN OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMCNEILLY CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ENSWORTH SCHOOL — $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRACEWORKS MINISTRIES INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST NASHVILLE ATHLETICS — $3,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHARDING ACADEMY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACKFIELD IN MOTION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNASHVILLE COACHING COALITION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FED BY FAITH DBA BY FAITH FARM
  • Who funds SAINT BERNARD ACADEMY
  • Who funds CHANGE THE STARS INC
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds Amputee Blade Runners
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR LIVING AND LEARNING INC
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC
  • Who funds HARPETH CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds ONE GENERATION AWAY
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC
  • Who funds CHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN AND MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds NASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC
  • Who funds PROJECT REDESIGN INC
  • Who funds NASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds SNOOTY GIGGLES DOG RESCUE
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE
  • Who funds Book Em
  • Who funds DISMAS INC
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HANDS ON NASHVILLE INC
  • Who funds PORTLAND PAY IT FORWARD

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN35.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Frist Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Joe C Davis Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · Patricia and Rodes Hart Foundation · T & T Family Foundation · The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation · Carolyn Smith Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James W Carell Charitable Trust Co Cumberland Trust Company funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James W Carell Charitable Trust Co Cumberland Trust Company?

    Find your warmest path to James W Carell Charitable Trust Co Cumberland Trust Company through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph