Skip to content

· Private foundation

James W Carell Charitable Trust Co Cumberland Trust Company

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$957kHealth$491kEducation$456kRecreation & Sports$193kYouth Development$183kInternational$165kHousing & Shelter$157kHuman Services$154kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $257k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $501k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FED BY FAITH$275,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$170,000
MAKE A WISH$75,000
TEMPLETON ACADEMY$75,000
NASHVILLE GIVES HOPE$75,000
FRIENDS OF WALKERS PEACE CENTER$55,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENN$50,500
NASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION$25,000
SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER$25,000
NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION$25,000
ONE GENERATION AWAY$25,000
DISMAS HOUSE$23,000
FRIENDS OF WARNER PARKS$20,000
HARPETH CONSERVANCY$20,000
CROSS ROAD CAMPUS$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRACEWORKS MINISTRIES: $3k → 4%PROJECT REDESIGN: $7k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $50k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $36k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CT
CA
CO
TN
NC
SC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 41 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
19

Total granted

$3.0M
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+52%

Still filing today

61%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FED BY FAITH DBA BY FAITH FARM
    5× · 2021–2025 · $496k · revenue +725% · 68% of their budget
  • SB
    SAINT BERNARD ACADEMY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $166k · revenue +27%
  • CT
    CHANGE THE STARS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $162k · revenue ×171

Funded once

  • E2
    EQUIP 2022
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • HO
    HANDS ON NASHVILLE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
2
New Hope Academy

Christ-centered school educating children of diverse racial & socioeconomic backgrounds by establishing a biblical worldview & preparing each child to flourish academically, emotionally, socially & spiritually.

Education
3
Kings Academy Nashville

King's academy is a pre-k-8th grade independent christian school in nashville, tennessee, providing a classically inspired education to a racially and socioeconomically balanced student body.

Education
4
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
5
Equally Created

To ensure accessible early childhood education for all families in the greater nashville area.

Human Services
6
Nashville Inner City Ministry Inc

Nashville inner city ministry is a christ-centered community organization dedicated to empowering the spiritual, educational and vocational development of at-risk youth and their families.

—
7
Needlink Nashville

Provide needy families and individuals with rent and utilities assistance in order to prevent their eviction or termination of utility services. also provide food and other assistance to needy families and individuals.

—
8
Nashville Zoo Inc

In fulfillment of our mission to inspire a culture of understanding and discovery of our natural world through conservation, innovation and leadership, our goal is to build a first class zoo for middle tennessee and to develop a facility…

Animals
9
Lead Public Schools Inc

Lead public schools exists to prepare all our students with the knowledge and skills to succeed in college and in life.

Education
10
Nashville Cares

Nashville cares exists to end the hiv epidemic, promote comprehensive sexual health and end sexual health stigmatization and discrimination through prevention, education, treatment, support, advocacy, and strategic partnership.

Health
11
Greenways for Nashville Inc

Greenways for nashville promotes, supports, and enhances a system of greenways and open space in nashville and davidson county.

Recreation & Sports
12
The Village At Glencliff

The village at glencliff's mission is to provide a healing community for medically vulnerable, unhoused nashvillians to safely recover, stabilize their lives, and imagine their futures.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Snooty Giggles Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
25/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $381,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKMAKE A WISH: $212,500 · OtherMAKE A WISHCROSS ROAD CAMPUS: $174,550 · OtherCROSS ROAD CAMPUSCENTER FOR LIVING AND LEARNING INC: $75,000 · OtherTEMPLETON ACADEMY: $75,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC: $79,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $70,500 · OtherHARPETH CONSERVANCY: $70,000 · Other+39 more: $856,381 · Other+39 moreFED BY FAITH DBA BY FAITH FARM: $496,050 · Food & NutritionFED BY FAITH DBA …+1 more: $15,000 · Food & NutritionSAINT BERNARD ACADEMY: $165,860 · EducationMONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE: $30,500 · EducationBook Em: $25,000 · Education+3 more: $8,500 · EducationCHANGE THE STARS INC: $161,500 · InternationalNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $114,360 · Housing & ShelterNASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC: $42,590 · Housing & ShelterAmputee Blade Runners: $106,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT REDESIGN INC: $40,950 · Human Services+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $122,135 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · Health
Other$1,993,931Food & Nutrition$511,050Education$229,860International$161,500Housing & Shelter$156,950Human Services$149,950Health$144,635

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFED BY FAITH DBA BY FAITH FARM: $496,050 over 5y, 68% of budgetSAINT BERNARD ACADEMY: $165,860 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHANGE THE STARS INC: $161,500 over 8y, 15% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $122,135 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $114,360 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC: $79,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCENTER FOR LIVING AND LEARNING INC: $75,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $70,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARPETH CONSERVANCY: $70,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetONE GENERATION AWAY: $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $58,690 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN AND MUSEUM OF ART: $58,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC: $42,590 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT REDESIGN INC: $40,950 over 8y, 9.0% of budgetNASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSNOOTY GIGGLES DOG RESCUE: $31,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE: $30,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBook Em: $25,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetDISMAS INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ON NASHVILLE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPORTLAND PAY IT FORWARD: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetROCKETOWN OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMCNEILLY CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ENSWORTH SCHOOL: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEAST NASHVILLE ATHLETICS: $3,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGRACEWORKS MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Legacy Missions International: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE COACHING COALITION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHARDING ACADEMY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACKFIELD IN MOTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FED BY FAITH DBA BY FAITH FARM ↗
  • Who funds SAINT BERNARD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CHANGE THE STARS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Amputee Blade Runners ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR LIVING AND LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds HARPETH CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ONE GENERATION AWAY ↗
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN AND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT REDESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SNOOTY GIGGLES DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Book Em ↗
  • Who funds DISMAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HANDS ON NASHVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND PAY IT FORWARD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN35.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Frist Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Joe C Davis Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · Patricia and Rodes Hart Foundation · T & T Family Foundation · The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation · Carolyn Smith Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James W Carell Charitable Trust Co Cumberland Trust Company funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James W Carell Charitable Trust Co Cumberland Trust Company. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James W Carell Charitable Trust Co Cumberland Trust Company?

    Find your warmest path to James W Carell Charitable Trust Co Cumberland Trust Company through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James W Carell Charitable Trust Co Cumberland Trust Company’s filings →

    More from the funding graph