Skip to content
James T & Claudette M Rodgers Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

James T & Claudette M Rodgers Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2021
3
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Philanthropy$813kReligion$34kYouth Development$10kCommunity Improvement$8kEducation$6kHealth$3kRecreation & Sports$3kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2021 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,381
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUND$6,382
FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND$6,381
SCHWAB CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND$6,381
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BETWEEN JOBS MINISRTY: $3k → 9%KINGDOM CALLING MINISTRIES: $3k → 10%GIDEON BAPTIST CHURCH: $250 → 16%FIRST SERVE OKC: $3k → 16%SHRINER'S HOSPITALFOR CHILDREN: $500 → 13%ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $500 → 8%COMPASSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $670 → 9%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $27k → 12%US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST DONOR ADVISED FUND: $8k → 16%AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUND: $237k → 13%LOUISIANNA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 32%FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND: $237k → 11%VINTAGE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $1k → 16%FIRST SERVE OKC: $3k → 16%COMPASSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $270 → 9%COMMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $8k → 12%THE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST CO RENAISSANCE PHILANTHROPIC SOLUTIONS GROUP: $2k → 16%AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUND: $16k → 13%LOUISIANNA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 32%FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND: $6k → 11%THE 100 CLUB: $650 → 16%FAITH IN ACTION: $2k → 9%AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUND: $6k → 13%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $1k → 16%AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUND: $668 → 13%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $1k → 16%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $500 → 16%ACTS OF WORSHIP MINISTRY: $17k → 16%HOME PLACE OF TEXAS: $2k → 16%NORTHWEST BIBLE CHURCH: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
OH
CO
KY
AZ
KS
DC
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 44% of James T & Claudette M Rodgers Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

James T & Claudette M Rodgers Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$532k · 6 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
24

Total granted

$532k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+53%

Still filing today

33%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21
Recreation & SportsReligionHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SCHWAB CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND
    2× · 2020–2021 · $273k
  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND
    2× · 2020–2021 · $243k
  • LT
    LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue -22%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $27k
  • AO
    ACTS OF WORSHIP MINISTRY
    one grant, 2019 · $17k
  • UC
    US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
4
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Banner Health Foundation

Established in 2001, banner health foundation secures and stewards charitable contributions to advance banner health's mission, investing in facilities and programs that support advancements in care, research, medical education, patient…

Health
8
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
9
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
10
Financial Planning Ministry

Financial planning ministry, inc. (fpm) is a not-for-profit organization devoted to assisting in the performance of the functions of christian churches by serving their financial needs.

Health
11
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
12
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Between Jobs Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHWAB CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND: $273,152 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUNDFIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND: $243,152 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUNDCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $26,730 · Other+18 more: $52,800 · Other+18 moreAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $260,003 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION+1 more: $8,000 · PhilanthropyLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,350 · EducationYOUNG LIFE: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentBetween Jobs Ministry Inc: $3,000 · ReligionPARACLETE MISSION GROUP INC: $500 · ReligionHOME PLACE OF TEXAS: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $500 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $240 · Recreation & SportsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $500 · Health
Other$595,834Philanthropy$268,003Education$6,350Youth Development$3,500Religion$3,500Recreation & Sports$2,740Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $260,003 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBetween Jobs Ministry Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOME PLACE OF TEXAS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $940 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB INC: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARACLETE MISSION GROUP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James T & Claudette M Rodgers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James T & Claudette M Rodgers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James T & Claudette M Rodgers’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home