Skip to content

· Private foundation

James R Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$422k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$1.3MPhilanthropy$246kReligion$151kHealth$97kEducation$86kArts & Culture$67kFood & Nutrition$58kInternational$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $210k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Clear Water Foundation$210,000
Baptists on Mission$25,000
United Way of Asheville Buncombe Co$25,000
Presbyterian Church USA$25,000
VTC School of Medicine$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,500
CFWNC$15,000
First Scots Presbyterian Church$12,000
Asheville Area Habitat for Humanity$11,000
The Preservation Society of Charles$11,000
Trident Technical College Foundatio$10,000
Carillon Clinic Foundation$10,000
Woodberry Forest School$8,000
Feeding America Southwest Va$5,000
Bethany Christian Church$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Wounded Warrior Project: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CT
CO
KY
WV
VA
NC
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 16 repeat orgs$413k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$1.7M
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+90%

Still filing today

31%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $34k · revenue +52%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +35%
  • LF
    LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • TP
    The Preservation Society of Charleston Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +90%
  • RX
    ROPER XAVIER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • GF
    GOOD FRIENDS OF THE LOWCOUNTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Lowcountry Land Trust Inc

To protect land and water forever, nurture relationships between people and place, and connect conservation to community.

Environment
7
Virginia Innovation Partnership Corporation

Vipc grows and diversifies virginia's economy by investing in and accelerating innovation commercialization and entrepreneurship.

Science & Tech
8
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
9
Association for the Preservation of Va Antiquities

To preserve, promote and serve as an advocate for virginia's irreplaceable historic places for cultural, economic and educational benefits for everyone.

Arts & Culture
10
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Good Friends of the Lowcountry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARMONY SENIOR SERVICES: $1,258,025 · OtherHARMONY SENIOR SERVICESClear Water Foundation: $210,000 · OtherClear Water FoundationFIRST (SCOTS) PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $94,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $87,400 · Other+32 more: $373,750 · Other+32 moreWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $34,000 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · InternationalGOOD FRIENDS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY: $6,000 · PhilanthropyCOASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMSI US: $2,500 · PhilanthropyASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterSpecial Olympics Virginia Inc: $1,750 · Recreation & SportsCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,500 · Animals
Other$2,023,425Education$39,000International$20,000Philanthropy$13,500Housing & Shelter$11,000Recreation & Sports$1,750Animals$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $34,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Preservation Society of Charleston Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD FRIENDS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY: $6,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCOASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMSI US: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Olympics Virginia Inc: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA PUBLIC ACCESS PROJECT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds The Preservation Society of Charleston Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD FRIENDS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MSI US ↗
  • Who funds Special Olympics Virginia Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James R Smith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James R Smith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James R Smith Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph