Skip to content

· Private foundation

James M Cox Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$544kHuman Services$72kPhilanthropy$28kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$2k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN$26,000
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE$17,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA$16,000
SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE$8,000
WAYNE STATE COLLEGE$8,000
METRO COMMUNITY COLLEGE$6,000
HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
OUT OF POVERTY$5,000
NEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME$5,000
GRACE CHILDRENS HOME$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA KEARNEY$4,000
CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$4,000
NEBRASKA COLLEGE OF TECHNICAL$2,000
DOANE UNIVERSITY$2,000
XENON ACADEMY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRACE CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 11%GRACE CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 11%GRACE CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 11%GRACE CHILDRENS HOME: $4k → 11%GRACE CHILDRENS HOME: $3k → 11%OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $5k → 12%OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $5k → 12%OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $3k → 12%OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$590k · 25 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
12

Total granted

$590k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+25%

Still filing today

36%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GRACE CHILDREN'S HOME COMPANY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +12%
  • OB
    OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +118%
  • NW
    NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $13k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • MC
    METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • CC
    Clarkson College
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
Midamerica Nazarene University

Midamerica nazarene university (mnu) is a transformative university that nurtures christlike community, pursues academic excellence, and cultivates a passion to serve. (continued on schedule o)mnu is a comprehensive liberal arts university…

Education
4
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
5
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
6
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
7
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
8
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
11
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
12
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concordia University; the most unlike its peers is Grace Children's Home Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN: $156,560 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLNNORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $71,000 · OtherNORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA: $67,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHAWAYNE STATE COLLEGE: $53,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-KEARNEY: $36,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-KEARNEYSOUTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $34,000 · OtherSOUTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGENEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME: $28,000 · OtherCENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $18,500 · Other+17 more: $64,906 · Other+17 moreGRACE CHILDREN'S HOME COMPANY: $27,200 · Human ServicesOMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC: $20,200 · Human ServicesNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationDOANE UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationHASTINGS COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $2,000 · EducationCreighton University: $2,000 · EducationMIDLAND UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · EducationHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · PhilanthropyCENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$528,966Human Services$47,400Education$42,000Philanthropy$28,000Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE CHILDREN'S HOME COMPANY: $27,200 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetOMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC: $20,200 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOANE UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClarkson College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYORK UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRACE CHILDREN'S HOME COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DOANE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Clarkson College ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YORK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Educationquest Foundation IncNE20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Educationquest Foundation Inc · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Marjorie Leu Skala Foundation Trust · Cooper Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Hooker Cty Community Foundationinc · The Steinhart Foundation Inc · Berneice M Hopper Private Foundation 9285002 · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Ibm International Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James M Cox Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James M Cox Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James M Cox’s filings →

    More from the funding graph