Skip to content

· Private foundation

James J O'Connell Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$622kHealth$450kEducation$161kInternational$45kHousing & Shelter$40kEnvironment$21Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $89k
$10,422
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RWJ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$36,477
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$31,266
PRINCETON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION$10,422
DEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,422
THE COOPER FOUNDATION$5,211
NEW JERSEY HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,211
Individual grant recipient$5,211
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CANAVAN FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 17%OPPORTUNITY PROJECT INC: $10k → 16%CANAVAN FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 17%OPPORTUNITY PROJECT INC: $5k → 16%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $12k → 17%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 18 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$1.3M
$62k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RWJ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $151k · revenue +156%
  • SP
    ST PETER'S FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +81%
  • PC
    PRINCETON CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE
    3× · 2018–2024 · $20k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • PH
    PRINCETON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • PM
    PRINCETON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • JS
    JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Peter's Healthcare System Physician Associates Pc

To support the charitable purposes, programs and services of saint peter's university hospital ("the hospital"); a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, which provides medically necessary healthcare…

—
2
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…

Health
3
Barnabas Health Medical Group Pc

The provision of professional medical physician services without regard to ability to pay and in a charitable manner to support the goals and objectives of rwj barnabas health, inc. ("rwj bh") and its affiliates; a tax-exempt integrated…

Health
4
Cooper University Hospital Cape Regional Inc

Cape regional medical center merged with the cooper health system, camden, new jersey (chs) in july of 2024. cooper university hospital cape regional, inc. ("crmc") is a general medical and surgical acute care hospital located in cape may…

Health
5
Kennedy Health Care Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to transform the health care experience through a culture of caring, quality and innovation. this organization is the philanthropic arm of jefferson health new jersey ("system"). the major goal of the…

Philanthropy
6
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
7
The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation

See schedule ocooper health system is an integrated health care delivery system serving the southern new jersey region. cooper health system's mission is to serve, to heal, and to educate. cooper accomplishes its mission through innovative…

Health
8
John F Kennedy Medical Center Foundation Inc

To support the charitable purposes, programs and services of

Health
9
Hmh Hospitals Corporation

The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
10
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Rahway Foundation

The robert wood johnson university hospital rahway foundation, inc. is a tax-exempt organization that raises funds to support the charitable purposes, programs and services of robert wood johnson university hospital rahway; a related…

—
11
Rwjbh Medical Group Pc

The provision of professional medical physician services without regard to ability to pay and in a charitable manner to support the goals and objectives of rwj barnabas health, inc. and its affiliates; a tax-exempt integrated healthcare…

Health
12
Cooper University Health Cape Regional Inc

The mission of the cooper university health cape regional, inc. is to continually develop and operate a tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system which includes cooper university hospital cape regional, inc.; an internal revenue…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Princeton Healthcare System Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Canavan Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RWJUH FOUNDATION: $605,000 · OtherRWJUH FOUNDATIONST PETER'S FOUNDATION: $45,059 · OtherST PETER'S FOUNDATIONPARKER MEMORIAL HOME: $40,000 · OtherPRINCETON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Other+13 more: $103,385 · Other+13 moreTHE RWJ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $151,164 · HealthTHE RWJ UNIVERSITY HOS…DEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $45,451 · HealthDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUND…PRINCETON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $40,481 · HealthPRINCETON HEALTHCARE S…THE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER AND BLOOD DISORDERS INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE INSTITUTE FOR CHIL…NEW JERSEY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $10,758 · HealthRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $161,354 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVE…Canavan Foundation Inc: $56,433 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY PROJECT INC: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$823,444Health$267,854Education$161,354Human Services$71,433

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $161,354 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RWJ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $151,164 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCanavan Foundation Inc: $56,433 over 6y, 12% of budgetDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $45,451 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST PETER'S FOUNDATION: $45,059 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPRINCETON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $40,481 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRINCETON CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $20,029 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER AND BLOOD DISORDERS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOPPORTUNITY PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNEW JERSEY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $10,758 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RWJ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Canavan Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST PETER'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER AND BLOOD DISORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COOPER FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Robert Wood Johnson FoundationNJ16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Oceanfirst Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James J O'Connell Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James J O'Connell Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Opportunity Project Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to James J O'Connell Fund?

Find your warmest path to James J O'Connell Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James J O'Connell’s filings →

More from the funding graph