Skip to content

· Private foundation

James F Byrnes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.1MHealth$19k
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$50,000
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$47,500
ANDERSON UNIVERSITY$25,000
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY$20,000
COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THE CITADEL$5,000
USC AIKEN$5,000
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$5,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY$5,000
FURMAN UNIVERSITY$5,000
NORTH CAROLINA A&T$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WOFFORD UNIVERSITY$5,000
LANDER UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 22%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%WINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%USC BEAUFORT: $5k → 10%FURMAN UNIVERSITY: $9k → 10%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $16k → 12%USC UPSTATE: $10k → 15%TRI-COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $5k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $50k → 16%USC AIKEN: $9k → 17%LIMESTONE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%PRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%LANDER UNIVERSITY: $10k → 18%FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY: $10k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 14%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%NORTH CAROLINA A&T: $9k → 16%WINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $14k → 8%FURMAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $15k → 12%USC UPSTATE: $9k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $57k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $45k → 16%USC AIKEN: $5k → 17%LANDER UNIVERSITY: $7k → 18%FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY: $5k → 20%NORTH CAROLINA A&T: $5k → 16%WINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $14k → 12%WOFFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $57k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $38k → 16%LANDER UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%WINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $14k → 12%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $54k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $38k → 16%WINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $9k → 12%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $48k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $30k → 16%WINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $9k → 12%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $42k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $28k → 16%THE CITADEL: $9k → 12%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $30k → 16%THE CITADEL: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
UT
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 29 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+14%

Still filing today

34%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    ANDERSON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $39k · revenue +35%
  • FU
    FURMAN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +43%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    4× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • MT
    MIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • NG
    NORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
5
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
6
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
7
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
8
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
9
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
10
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
11
Southwest Baptist University

Christ-centered, caring academic community preparing students to be servant leaders in a global society; a higher-education institution offering courses that lead to both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education
12
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Greenville University; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $288,433 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $229,278 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINACOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $75,750 · OtherCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTONWINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $69,500 · OtherWINTHROP UNIVERSITYUSC AIKEN: $32,000 · OtherTHE CITADEL: $32,000 · Other+18 more: $227,983 · Other+18 moreANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $39,310 · EducationANDERSON UNIVERS…FURMAN UNIVERSITY: $32,000 · EducationFURMAN UNIVERSIT…Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $18,500 · EducationTemple Universit…LYNN UNIVERSITY INC: $18,000 · EducationLYNN UNIVERSITY …WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $18,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIV…LIMESTONE UNIVERSITY: $14,000 · EducationLIMESTONE UNIVER…Belmont University: $13,500 · EducationBelmont Universi…New York University: $7,000 · Education+4 more: $8,087 · Education
Other$954,944Education$168,397

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $39,310 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFURMAN UNIVERSITY: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $18,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLYNN UNIVERSITY INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIMESTONE UNIVERSITY: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWBERRY COLLEGE: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENEDICT COLLEGE: $1,337 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FURMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds LYNN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIMESTONE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Belmont University ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds NORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEWBERRY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BENEDICT COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Campbell Young LeadersSC17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Campbell Young Leaders · Dick Horne Foundation · Watson-Brown Foundation Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Duke Energy Foundation · South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Chapman Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James F Byrnes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James F Byrnes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lynn University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to James F Byrnes Foundation?

Find your warmest path to James F Byrnes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James F Byrnes’ filings →

More from the funding graph