Skip to content

· Private foundation

James and Marilyn a Gilmore Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$680k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$136k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.0MEducation$1.2MHealth$469kArts & Culture$252kHuman Services$128kEnvironment$74kFood & Nutrition$54kScience & Tech$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $510k
$7,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITTSBURGH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$136,000
SHADYSIDE ACADEMY$136,000
THIRD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$136,000
GILMORE OBGYN PHYSICIAN'S RESEARCH FUND$102,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY$25,000
CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH$15,000
EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES$11,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$11,000
WQED$9,000
ACHIEVA$7,000
PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY$7,000
EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH$7,000
FAMILY RESOURCES$6,000
PITTSBURGH BOTANICAL GARDEN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $11k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $7k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $4k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $4k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $2k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES: $2k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $7k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $7k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $6k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $4k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $6k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $6k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $5k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $5k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $5k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $4k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $3k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $2k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 24 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +59% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
3

Total granted

$4.2M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+59%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $137k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHADY SIDE ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +45%
  • CI
    CARNEGIE INSTITUTE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $88k · revenue +62%
  • TN
    THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +170%

Funded once

  • HH
    HURRICANE HARVEY RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SM
    ST MARGARET FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +59%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Friends of the Pittsburgh Institutions
—
2
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
3
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
4
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
5
Bosler Memorial Library

Form 990 - mission statement the bosler memorial library is a leading intellectual, educational, recreational, and cultural asset in cumberland county. founded in 1900, this public library serves the borough of carlisle, seven townships in…

—
6
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
7
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
8
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
9
Children's Museum of Pittsburgh

The museum's mission is to provide innovative and inclusive museum experiences that inspire kindness, joy, creativity and curiosity for all learners.

Arts & Culture
10
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
11
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
12
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carnegie Institute; the most unlike its peers is Squirrel Island Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PITTSBURGH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE UTD PREBY CHRC UTD STS AMER: $1,021,500 · OtherPITTSBURGH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE UTD PREBY CHRC UTD STS AMERTHIRD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $996,500 · OtherTHIRD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK: $314,000 · OtherALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORKGILMORE OBGYN PHYSICIAN'S RESEARCH FUND: $102,000 · Other+9 more: $181,600 · Other+9 moreSHADY SIDE ACADEMY: $1,021,500 · EducationSHADY SIDE ACADEMYTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $78,000 · EducationTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY+2 more: $49,000 · EducationCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $88,000 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA: $55,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $52,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $28,000 · Arts & CultureSQUIRREL ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $28,000 · Arts & CultureEAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $45,000 · Human ServicesEMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCES: $38,000 · Human ServicesGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $54,000 · Food & NutritionACHIEVA: $48,000 · HealthST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthSquirrel Island Preservation Foundation: $39,000 · EnvironmentPittsburgh Botanic Garden: $35,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,615,600Education$1,148,500Arts & Culture$251,000Human Services$128,000Food & Nutrition$54,000Health$53,000Environment$39,000Youth Development$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHADY SIDE ACADEMY: $1,021,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $88,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $78,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA: $55,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $54,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $52,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVA: $48,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $45,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSquirrel Island Preservation Foundation: $39,000 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES: $38,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPittsburgh Botanic Garden: $35,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $28,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSQUIRREL ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $28,000 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH: $26,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSQUIRREL ISLAND LIBRARY: $24,000 over 9y, 27% of budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $23,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHADY SIDE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds WQED MULTIMEDIA ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVA ↗
  • Who funds EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC ↗
  • Who funds Squirrel Island Preservation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds Pittsburgh Botanic Garden ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds SQUIRREL ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds SQUIRREL ISLAND LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds ST MARGARET FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jack Buncher FoundationPA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jack Buncher Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Burke Family Foundation · The Burke Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Charles R Burke Jr Foundation · The Double Eagle Foundation 4191-06-43 · Robert & Mary Weisbrod Foundation · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James and Marilyn a Gilmore Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James and Marilyn a Gilmore Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James and Marilyn a Gilmore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph