Skip to content

California · Private foundation

James and Lynne Newman Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$409k
Granted FY2019
8
Grants FY2019
8
Organizations funded FY2019
50%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2019
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$154,739
Organizations funded a year
5 to 8
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
3
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 50% of the organizations James and Lynne Newman Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 78% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $320k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
EducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20198$409k50%
FY20185$29k60%
FY20176$32kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$309kRecreation & Sports$73kHuman Services$55kHealth$18kAnimals$10kYouth Development$2kArts & Culture$1kEnvironment$585Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of James and Lynne Newman Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Wisconsin Foundation$154,73910%
University of Illinois Foundation$154,33610%
Pacific Crest Trail Association$73,29731%
San Diego Center for Children$44,98430%
Geneva National Foundation Inc Dawn Mall$17,500212%
The Time Is Now to Help Inc$10,2791n/a
Shedd Aquarium Society$10,00010%
Never Say Never Foundation$1,5001n/a
Geneva Lake Museum Inc$1,00020%
Geneva Lake Conservancy Inc$58510%
Covenant Harbor Bible Camp$5001n/a

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($700), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget James and Lynne Newman Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Wisconsin Foundation: $154,739 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $154,336 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Crest Trail Association: $73,297 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSan Diego Center for Children: $44,984 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGeneva National Foundation Inc Dawn Mall: $17,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetShedd Aquarium Society: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGeneva Lake Museum Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGeneva Lake Conservancy Inc: $585 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare James and Lynne Newman Foundation with peer funders

About James and Lynne Newman Foundation

How much does James and Lynne Newman Foundation give?
James and Lynne Newman Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $408,635 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 8 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does James and Lynne Newman Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Education (66%), Recreation & Sports (16%), Human Services (12%).
Who are James and Lynne Newman Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2019: University of Wisconsin Foundation ($155k), University of Illinois Foundation ($154k), Pacific Crest Trail Association ($73k).
Does James and Lynne Newman Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does James and Lynne Newman Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as James and Lynne Newman Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc, Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc.
Where is James and Lynne Newman Foundation based?
James and Lynne Newman Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James and Lynne Newman’s filings →

More from the funding graph