Skip to content

· Private foundation

James and Karen Hyde Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$287kArts & Culture$280kEducation$37kEnvironment$33kInternational$30kPublic Benefit$10kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$40,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM$5,000
MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$5,000
EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF WI$5,000
WAUKESHA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY$5,000
OLD WORLD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 35% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OLD WORLD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5k → 5%MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART: $25k → 6%OLD WORLD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM: $5k → 17%OLD WORLD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5k → 5%MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART: $21k → 6%OLD WORLD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM: $5k → 17%MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART: $15k → 6%OLD WORLD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 17%MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART: $13k → 6%MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM: $5k → 17%MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM: $5k → 17%MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 17%ST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $40k → 5%DIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE HAITI PROJECT: $5k → 17%ST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $40k → 5%MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 17%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $40k → 5%MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 17%ST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $40k → 5%MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM: $5k → 17%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $32k → 5%MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM: $5k → 17%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $25k → 5%EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF WI: $5k → 17%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $25k → 5%MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM: $5k → 17%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $25k → 5%MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 17%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20k → 5%MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 17%TEN CHIMNEYS: $5k → 5%HAITI PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 17%TEN CHIMNEYS: $5k → 5%HAITI PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 17%TEN CHIMNEYS: $5k → 5%MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM: $5k → 17%TEN CHIMNEYS: $5k → 5%MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM: $5k → 17%TEN CHIMNEYS: $5k → 5%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC TELEVISION: $10k → 17%TEN CHIMNEYS: $5k → 5%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM: $5k → 17%TEN CHIMNEYS: $5k → 5%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM: $5k → 17%NASHOTAH HOUSE: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$693k · 15 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$693k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+96%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $78k · revenue +60%
  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +34%
  • MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • NH
    NASHOTAH HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • PM
    PABST MANSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +96%
  • MC
    MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN GRADUA
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Public Museum Endowment Fund

Supporting the charitable, scientific and educational purposes of the milwaukee public museum.

—
2
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
3
Wisconsin Museum of Nature and Culture

WMNC will continue constructing the new Milwaukee Public Museum facility to completion and will then continue as the owner and operator of the new museum.

Arts & Culture
4
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
5
Waukesha County Historical Society & Museum Inc

The museum is an educational institution dedicated to preserving the history and culture of waukesha county.

—
6
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
7
Wisconsin Academy of Sciences Arts and Letters

To cultivate civil discourse, increase understanding, and create common ground by connecting wisconsin people and ideas.

Arts & Culture
8
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
9
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
10
Milwaukee County Historical Society Inc

The milwaukee county historical society was founded in 1935 to collect, preserve, and make available materials relating to the history of the milwaukee community.

Arts & Culture
11
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
12
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Roosevelt High School Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $287,126 · OtherST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $44,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOLD WORLD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 · OtherOLD WORLD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INCDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE HAITI PROJECT: $25,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE HAITI PROJECTIndividual grant recipient: $24,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · Other+5 more: $35,572 · Other+5 moreMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC: $77,735 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INCMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INCMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $12,000 · EducationUniversity of the Pacific: $12,000 · EducationROOSEVELT HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationWAUKESHA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $15,000 · Environment
Other$467,098Arts & Culture$217,735Education$26,000Environment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC: $77,735 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOLD WORLD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPABST MANSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD WORLD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WAUKESHA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
  • Who funds PABST MANSION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOSEVELT HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James and Karen Hyde Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James and Karen Hyde Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James and Karen Hyde’s filings →

More from the funding graph