Skip to content

· Private foundation

James & Jane Sutow Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$205kPhilanthropy$164kHuman Services$62kHealth$55kReligion$32kCrime & Legal$14kYouth Development$12kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$923k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$5,000
NORTHWOOD SCHOOL$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$1,500
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PA$1,000
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%INTER-FAITH HOUSING ALLIANCE: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
AZ
KS
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$451k · 15 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
31

Total granted

$451k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+27%

Still filing today

47%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTHWOOD SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +9%
  • MK
    MISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +490%
  • KA
    KELLY ANNE DOLAN MEMORIAL FUND
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • AC
    ABRAMSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
  • AF
    ABRAMSON FAMILY CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • ES
    ED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Philadelphia Convention & Visitors Bureau

The philadelphia convention & visitors bureau (phlcvb) is the official tourism promotion agency for the city of philadelphia globally, and the sales and marketing agency for the pennsylvania convention center (pcc). phlcvb markets…

—
4
Philadelphia Academy of School Leaders Inc

We develop, engage, and retain principals and system leaders who transform schools, dramatically improve student outcomes, and drive systemic change to prepare all philadelphia students for college, career, and life.

Education
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
The Pittsburgh Promise Foundation

The pittsburgh promise promotes high educational aspirations among urban youth, funds scholarships for post-secondary access, and fuels a prepared and diverse regional workforce.

Philanthropy
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Basis Impact Group Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWOOD SCHOOL: $115,000 · OtherNORTHWOOD SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $73,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $56,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSENORTHWOOD SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherNORTHWOOD SCHOOLJEWISH FEDERATION: $45,645 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONFEDERATION ALLIED JEWISH APPEAL: $39,500 · OtherFEDERATION ALLIED JEWISH APPEALCONGREGATION BETH OR: $30,136 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ORABRAMSON CANCER CENTER: $22,800 · Other+26 more: $52,721 · Other+26 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $77,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERA…+1 more: $200 · PhilanthropyTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $30,000 · EducationBASIS IMPACT GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $3,200 · Education+3 more: $1,250 · EducationMISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $13,500 · Crime & LegalED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATION: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsKELLY ANNE DOLAN MEMORIAL FUND: $1,500 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthTRANSPLANT FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $300 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION: $1,500 · Youth Development
Other$490,052Philanthropy$77,200Education$34,450Crime & Legal$13,500Recreation & Sports$5,000Health$4,400Youth Development$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $77,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWOOD SCHOOL: $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $13,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBASIS IMPACT GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $3,200 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetKELLY ANNE DOLAN MEMORIAL FUND: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMAJNZ FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSPLANT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG SCHOLARS CHARTER SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE LIKE BLAINE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKATE SVITEK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds MISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America ↗
  • Who funds BASIS IMPACT GROUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KELLY ANNE DOLAN MEMORIAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION ↗
  • Who funds IMAJNZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG SCHOLARS CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fred and Bryna Berman Family Found Inc Berman Frederick B TteePA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fred and Bryna Berman Family Found Inc Berman Frederick B Ttee · Steven and Ilene Berman Family Foundation Inc · The Saramar Charitable Fund · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James & Jane Sutow Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James & Jane Sutow Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: 21% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James & Jane Sutow’s filings →

More from the funding graph