Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jacob C Koch Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$219kHuman Services$97kEducation$76kCivil Rights$61kEmployment$28kYouth Development$3kCommunity Improvement$3k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$854k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE$20,000
ST JOSEPH CHILDRENS HOME$20,000
DOWN SYNDROME OF LOUISVILLE INC$20,000
KIDS CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC THERAPIES$15,000
MATTINGLY CENTER INC$10,000
CENTER FOR COURAGEOUS KIDS$10,000
WORKWELL INDUSTRIES$8,000
HOME OF THE INNOCENTS$6,830
DAY SPRING$6,000
VISUALLY IMPAIRED PRESCHOOL SERVICE$3,852
GREEN HILL THERAPY$2,500
CEDAR LAKE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $7k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $7k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $7k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $6k → 15%DREAM WITH WINGS INC: $3k → 15%DAY SPRING: $13k → 15%DAY SPRING: $6k → 15%DAY SPRING: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$468k · 12 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$468k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+44%

Still filing today

92%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    Cerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $76k · revenue +4%
  • DS
    Down Syndrome of Louisville Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $68k · revenue +46%
  • HH
    HARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $61k · revenue +189%

Funded once

  • TD
    THE DEPAUL SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -11%
  • DW
    DREAMS WITH WINGS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +44%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS HAVEN
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Autism Services Inc

To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.

—
2
Developing Potential Inc

Operation of a Facility for training the severely handicapped to increase thier earning capabilities and to increase opportunities for health and wellness.

Employment
3
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
4
St Louis Learning Disabilities Association

To provide children with hope, understanding, and compassion so they can reach their full potential.

Human Services
5
Woodfield Academy Inc

Woodfield academy empowers students with diagnosed learning differences or developmental disorders to reach their maximum potential through an individualized education approach.

Education
6
Work Community Independence Inc

Wci's mission is to empower and support individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, autism, and acquired brain injury to achieve rich and meaningful lives at home, at work and in their communities.

—
7
Harwood Center Inc

Harwood center inc. exists to enable children with special needs to reach their full potential. harwood center provides early intervention therapy services to children diagnosed with developmental disabilities within the age range of 18…

—
8
Mur-Ci Homes Inc

To improve the quality of life for individuals with severe/profound disabilities by assisting them through high-quality 24 hour, 7 days a week continuous care.

Human Services
9
Build Rehabilitation Industries Inc

Build rehabilitation industries, inc. dba buildability ("build"), provides services and support for people with developmental and intellectual disabilities, assisting them to achieve greater independence and inclusion in their communities.

Employment
10
Cincinnati Center for Autism

We support individuals with autism and their families through programming in the areas of academics, adaptive behavior, communication, and social participation.

Education
11
Alexander Leigh Center for Autism

To provide an environment where children on the autistic spectrum can develop their potential academically, emotionally, socially, communicatively, physically and gain functional independence using programs and methods that are selected…

Education
12
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dreams With Wings Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cedar Lake Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc: $76,000 · HealthCerebral Palsy KIDS Center IncDown Syndrome of Louisville Inc: $68,300 · HealthDown Syndrome of Louisville IncPROJECT CAMP INC: $27,000 · HealthPROJECT CAMP INCGreen Hill Therapy Inc: $17,540 · HealthGreen Hill Therapy Inc+1 more: $2,500 · HealthST JOSEPH CATHOLIC ORPHAN SOCIETY: $70,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC ORPHA…VISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC: $18,553 · OtherVISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCH…PITT ACADEMY INC: $11,750 · OtherPITT ACADEMY INC+2 more: $4,500 · OtherHARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC: $60,630 · Civil RightsHARBOR HOUSE O…THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $26,634 · Human ServicesTHE HOME OF …DAY SPRING INC: $23,790 · Human ServicesDAY SPRING I…DREAMS WITH WINGS INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesMATTINGLY EDGE INC: $40,000 · EducationMATTINGLY E…THE DEPAUL SCHOOL INC: $6,000 · EducationTHE DEPAUL …BLUEGRASS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC: $2,195 · EducationWORKWELL INDUSTRIES INC: $28,138 · Employment
Health$191,340Other$104,803Civil Rights$60,630Human Services$52,924Education$48,195Employment$28,138

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc: $76,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetDown Syndrome of Louisville Inc: $68,300 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC: $60,630 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMATTINGLY EDGE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWORKWELL INDUSTRIES INC: $28,138 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT CAMP INC: $27,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $26,634 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDAY SPRING INC: $23,790 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC: $18,553 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGreen Hill Therapy Inc: $17,540 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPITT ACADEMY INC: $11,750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE DEPAUL SCHOOL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDREAMS WITH WINGS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUEGRASS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC: $2,195 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cralle Foundation IncKY32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cralle Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Irvin F & Alice S Etscorn Charitable Foundation · Wood & Marie Hannah Foundation · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jacob C Koch Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jacob C Koch Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jacob C Koch Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Jacob C Koch Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jacob C Koch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph