Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jacob Abramson Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2019
27
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Religion$17kHealth$11kHuman Services$5kPhilanthropy$3kEducation$3kArts & Culture$2kInternational$800Animals$200Other$0
02FY2019 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO SINAI CONGREGATION$7,100
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$2,000
DREAM STREET FOUNDATION$1,500
TEMPLE EMANUEL OF BEVERLY HILLS$1,500
HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS$1,000
KECK MED CENTER USC$1,000
CONGREGATION ANSHEI ISRAEL$1,000
TU NIDITO CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$1,000
LYNNE COHEN FDN FOR OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH$1,000
CENTER FOR LIFE AND LEARNING FOURTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$600
TEEN LINE$500
FOX THEATER$500
THE GREGORY SCHOOL$500
CHAI CIRCLE JEWISH FAMILY & CHILD SVCS$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $1k → 14%LYNNE COHEN FDN FOR OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH: $1k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $500 → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $500 → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $150 → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $500 → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $150 → 14%BEVERLY HILLS WOMENS CLUB: $500 → 14%BEVERLY HILLS WOMENS CLUB: $150 → 14%DREAM STREET FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%DREAM STREET FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BEVERLY HILLS WOMENS CLUB: $100 → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $150 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32k · 18 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$32k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+30%

Still filing today

33%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesHealthInternationalAnimalsCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +192%
  • UI
    UNITED IN HARMONY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $800 · revenue +176%
  • BH
    Beverly Hills Womens Club
    3× · 2017–2019 · $750 · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL
    one grant, 2017 · $250
  • RP
    REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $200 · revenue +199%
  • BI
    Brandworkers International Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $150 · revenue -70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
2
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
The Waverly School

The waverly school is a nonsectarian, coeducational, college preparatory progressive day school that spans preschool through high school. it is fully accredited by the western association of school and colleges and the california…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
8
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
9
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
10
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
11
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
12
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Happy Trails for Kids; the most unlike its peers is World Possible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO SINAI CONGREGATION: $10,300 · OtherCHICAGO SINAI CONGREGATIONTEMPLE EMANUEL OF BEVERLY HILLS: $3,500 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUEL OF BEVERLY HILLSCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN GROUPS: $1,350 · OtherCENTER FOR LIFE AND LEARNING FOURTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,100 · OtherKECK MED CENTER USC: $1,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ANSHEI ISRAEL: $1,000 · Other+18 more: $8,300 · Other+18 moreHAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $2,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY TRAILS FOR …DREAM STREET FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesDREAM STREET FOUN…LYNNE COHEN FOUNDATION FOR OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH: $1,000 · Human ServicesLYNNE COHEN FOUND…UNITED IN HARMONY: $800 · Human ServicesUNITED IN HARMONYBeverly Hills Womens Club: $750 · Human ServicesBeverly Hills Wom…+1 more: $150 · Human ServicesTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,500 · HealthTU NIDITO …Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $458 · HealthChildren's…JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $3,000 · PhilanthropyWORLD POSSIBLE: $750 · InternationalINVISIBLE THEATRE: $250 · Arts & CultureREID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $200 · Animals
Other$27,750Human Services$6,700Health$3,958Philanthropy$3,000International$750Arts & Culture$250Animals$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDREAM STREET FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN GROUPS: $1,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLYNNE COHEN FOUNDATION FOR OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED IN HARMONY: $800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMILLS COLLEGE: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBeverly Hills Womens Club: $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD POSSIBLE: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREGORY SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $458 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINVISIBLE THEATRE: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds DREAM STREET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN GROUPS ↗
  • Who funds LYNNE COHEN FOUNDATION FOR OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds UNITED IN HARMONY ↗
  • Who funds MILLS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Beverly Hills Womens Club ↗
  • Who funds WORLD POSSIBLE ↗
  • Who funds THE GREGORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds INVISIBLE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Brandworkers International Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Southern ArizonaAZ15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · American Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jacob Abramson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jacob Abramson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jacob Abramson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jacob Abramson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jacob Abramson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph