Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jackson Grace Family Philanthropic Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$672k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$23,100
THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY$4,000
ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION$3,750
GLOBAL VILLAGE KIDS$3,000
ST BONIFACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH$3,000
TRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND$2,000
BEADS OF COURAGE$1,500
HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCI$1,000
NAMI OREGON$1,000
THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER$1,000
COMFORT TABLE FOOD PANTRY$1,000
ST NICOLAS' EPISCOPAL CHURCH$500
HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH$500
ST BARNABAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$500
NAMI GREATER SAN ANTONIO$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nami Central Texas

The mission of NAMI Central Texas is to improve the lives of all persons affected by serious mental illness by providing support, education and advocacy through a grassroots network.

—
2
Nami Texas Inc

To help improve the quality of life for people affected by mental illness through education.

Health
3
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
4
The Briarwood School

The briarwood school empowers students with diagnosed learning differences or developmental disorders to reach their maximum potential through diagnostic-prescriptive instruction in a structured academic environment.

Education
5
Nami Palm Beach County Inc

Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.

Health
6
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
7
National Association of Independent Schools Inc

As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…

—
8
Nami Hancock County

Promoting mental health in hancock county to build better lives through education, support, and advocacy.

Health
9
Travis County Medical Society

Travis county medical society (tcms) represents the medical profession in matters of importance to the membership and the community it serves.

—
10
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

—
11
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
12
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami Oregon; the most unlike its peers is Comfort Public Library Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $23,100 · OtherST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCHST BONIFACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherST BONIFACE EPISCOPAL CHURCHGLOBAL VILLAGE KIDS INC: $3,000 · OtherGLOBAL VILLAGE KIDS INC+7 more: $4,775 · Other+7 moreThe Brookwood Community Inc: $4,000 · EducationThe Brookwood C…TRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS: $2,000 · EducationTRINITY SCHOOL …COMFORT PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $250 · EducationADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION: $3,750 · Arts & CultureADMIRAL N…BEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING: $1,500 · HealthNAMI OREGON: $1,000 · HealthHILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $500 · Human Services
Other$33,875Education$6,250Arts & Culture$3,750Health$2,500Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jackson Grace Family Philanthropic Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jackson Grace Family Philanthropic Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Nami Oregon: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jackson Grace Family Philanthropic Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph