Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jackson Grace Family Philanthropic Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$672k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$23,100
THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY$4,000
ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION$3,750
ST BONIFACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH$3,000
GLOBAL VILLAGE KIDS$3,000
TRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND$2,000
BEADS OF COURAGE$1,500
NAMI OREGON$1,000
HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCI$1,000
THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER$1,000
COMFORT TABLE FOOD PANTRY$1,000
ST BARNABAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$500
HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH$500
ST NICOLAS' EPISCOPAL CHURCH$500
NAMI GREATER SAN ANTONIO$500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nami Central Texas

The mission of NAMI Central Texas is to improve the lives of all persons affected by serious mental illness by providing support, education and advocacy through a grassroots network.

2
Nami Texas Inc

To help improve the quality of life for people affected by mental illness through education.

Health
3
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
4
The Briarwood School

The briarwood school empowers students with diagnosed learning differences or developmental disorders to reach their maximum potential through diagnostic-prescriptive instruction in a structured academic environment.

Education
5
Nami Palm Beach County Inc

Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.

Health
6
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
7
National Association of Independent Schools Inc

As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…

8
Nami Hancock County

Promoting mental health in hancock county to build better lives through education, support, and advocacy.

Health
9
Travis County Medical Society

Travis county medical society (tcms) represents the medical profession in matters of importance to the membership and the community it serves.

10
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

11
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
12
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami Oregon and the most unlike its peers is Comfort Public Library Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $23,100 · OtherST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCHST BONIFACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $3,000 · OtherST BONIFACE EPISCOPAL CHURCHGLOBAL VILLAGE KIDS INC — $3,000 · OtherGLOBAL VILLAGE KIDS INC+7 more — $4,775 · Other+7 moreThe Brookwood Community Inc — $4,000 · EducationThe Brookwood C…TRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS — $2,000 · EducationTRINITY SCHOOL …COMFORT PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $250 · EducationADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION — $3,750 · Arts & CultureADMIRAL N…BEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING — $1,500 · HealthNAMI OREGON — $1,000 · HealthHILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH — $500 · Human Services
Other$33,875Education$6,250Arts & Culture$3,750Health$2,500Human Services$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI GREATER SAN ANTONIO — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jackson Grace Family Philanthropic Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Nami Oregon10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph