Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jackson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$118kHuman Services$54kHealth$30kEducation$19kFood & Nutrition$19kHousing & Shelter$17kReligion$5kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$423k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Colorado State University - ROTC$5,000
North Central TX Civic Ballet$4,000
Community Prep School$3,000
Amos House$3,000
Salvation Army of North Texas$2,000
Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra$2,000
The Warm Place$2,000
United Service Organization$2,000
St Martins Church$2,000
Cooks Childrens Foundation$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Meals on Wheels of Tarrant County$1,500
Casa Manana$1,500
The Alamo Foundation$1,036
Washington on the Brazos$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHSIDE INTER COMMUNITY AGENCY: $2k → 11%NORTHSIDE INTER COMMUNITY AGENCY: $2k → 11%Northside Inter Community Agency: $2k → 11%Northside Inter Community Agency: $2k → 11%Northside Inter Community Agency: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$305k · 56 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
10

Total granted

$305k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-27%

Still filing today

29%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FW
    FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +1%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    6× · 2019–2025 · $12k · revenue +90%
  • AH
    AMOS HOUSE
    5× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • NC
    North Central Civic Ballet
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • U
    USO
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • IF
    Intrepad Fallen Heroes Fd
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Cowboy Hall of Fame Inc
Arts & Culture
2
The Museum of North Texas History

To collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret the history of the North Texas Area to inspire an interest in the past for the education and enrichment of people of all ages.

Arts & Culture
3
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
4
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
5
Alamo Trust Inc

The organization is to be operated exclusively to preserve and restore the alamo complex and to educate and inspire visitors on the history of all those who lived, fought, and died there.

Arts & Culture
6
Dallas County Historical Foundation

The sixth floor museum at dealey plaza chronicles the assassination and legacy of president john f. kennedy; interprets the dealey plaza national historic landmark district and the john f. kennedy memorial plaza; and presents contemporary…

Arts & Culture
7
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
8
Texas Horse Racing Hall of Fame
Philanthropy
9
Dallas Historical Society

The purpose of the society is to institute and encourage historical inquiry, to collect, preserve and exhibit the materials of history and to spread historical information, especially concerning the city of dallas, texas; the county of…

Arts & Culture
10
Lone Star Flight Museum

Lone Star Flight Museum (LSFM) celebrates flight and achievements in Texas aviation, engages youth through STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), and believes aviation inspires achievement and endless possibilities.

Arts & Culture
11
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
12
Tyler Museum of Art

Educational and cultural center to enrich lives through collection, study, exhibition, interpretation and celebration of visual arts.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra Association; the most unlike its peers is Heather's Old Skool Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Tarrant Area Food Bank: $12,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMOS HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherColorado State University - ROTC: $10,000 · OtherTRINITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 · OtherCOOKS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherLighthouse for the Blind: $8,000 · OtherCommunity Prep School: $7,500 · Other+46 more: $140,536 · Other+46 moreFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $14,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH SYMPHONY O…CASA MANANA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCASA MANANA INCFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $6,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF …Historic Fort Worth Inc: $6,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Fort Worth I…NORTH FORT WORTH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH FORT WORTH HIST…TEXAS TRAIL OF FAME INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS TRAIL OF FAME I…AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $6,000 · Arts & CultureAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF…San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association: $5,100 · Arts & CultureSan Jacinto Museum an…Remember the Alamo Foundation: $3,000 · Arts & CultureOperation Helping Hand Inc: $16,500 · Human ServicesNORTHSIDE INTERCOMMUNITY AGENCY INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY: $9,500 · Food & NutritionUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $8,000 · Public BenefitHeather's Old Skool Village: $3,000 · EducationDFW COCKER SPANIEL RESCUE: $100 · Animals
Other$218,036Arts & Culture$62,100Human Services$23,500Food & Nutrition$9,500Public Benefit$8,000Education$3,000Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOperation Helping Hand Inc: $16,500 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMOS HOUSE: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASA MANANA INC: $10,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSIDE INTERCOMMUNITY AGENCY INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Fort Worth Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH FORT WORTH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetTEXAS TRAIL OF FAME INC: $6,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSan Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association: $5,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHeather's Old Skool Village: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRemember the Alamo Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetDFW COCKER SPANIEL RESCUE: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Operation Helping Hand Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds AMOS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CASA MANANA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE INTERCOMMUNITY AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds Historic Fort Worth Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH FORT WORTH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TRAIL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART ↗
  • Who funds San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation IncTX19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Fash Foundation · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Frances C and William P Smallwood Foundation · Kenneth and Cherrie Garrett Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jackson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jackson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jackson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jackson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jackson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph