Skip to content

Nevada · Private foundation

Jack Van Sickle Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$543k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
32
Grants FY2024
23
Organizations funded FY2023
17%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
19 to 23
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$8.8M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 17% of the organizations Jack Van Sickle Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationCrime & LegalAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving23$543k0%
FY202323$511k17%
FY202221$575k0%
FY202122$580k9%
FY202020$550k0%
FY201920$545k20%
FY201819$556k5%
FY201720$518kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$1.7MEducation$990kArts & Culture$435kRecreation & Sports$349kFood & Nutrition$290kHuman Services$240kHealth$160kCrime & Legal$100kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 23 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($2.1M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Jack Van Sickle Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys and Girls Club of Truckee Meadows: $345,903 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $290,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTahoe Rim Trail Association: $224,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetStep 2 Inc: $160,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetNevada Museum of Art: $160,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Nevada Discovery Museum: $160,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation: $145,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetChannel 5 Public Broadcasting Inc: $115,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNorthern Nevada Legal Aid: $100,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTruckee Meadows Parks Foundation: $80,100 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetGirl Scouts of the Sierra Nevada Inc: $80,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Mason Valley: $70,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCatholic Charities of Northern Nevada: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe First Tee of Northern Nevada: $45,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSafe Talk for Teens: $40,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Nothern Nevada Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetVictory Ranch Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of North Lake Tahoe: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNevada Hands & Voices: $20,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetReno Rescue Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetEddy House: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJunior Achievement of Southern Nevada: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 22.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thelma B & Thomas P Hart FoundationNV34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Renown Health · Dermody Properties Foundation · Helen Close Charitable Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Tahoe Community Foundation · Roxie and Azad Joseph Foundation · William N Pennington Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Jack Van Sickle Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jack Van Sickle Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jack Van Sickle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Jack Van Sickle Foundation

How much does Jack Van Sickle Foundation give?
Jack Van Sickle Foundation reported 32 grants totaling $542,600 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 19 and 23 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Jack Van Sickle Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Youth Development (38%), Education (23%), Arts & Culture (10%).
Who are Jack Van Sickle Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Boys and Girls Club of Truckee Meadows ($346k), Food Bank of Northern Nevada Inc ($290k), Tahoe Rim Trail Association ($224k).
Does Jack Van Sickle Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Jack Van Sickle Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Jack Van Sickle Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation, The E L Cord Foundation, Community Foundation of Northern Nevada.
Where is Jack Van Sickle Foundation based?
Jack Van Sickle Foundation is based in NV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack Van Sickle’s filings →

More from the funding graph