How much did JACK DELOSS TAYLOR CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of JACK DELOSS TAYLOR CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

part lineneedy expressedexpressed part

2021

part lineneedy expressedexpressed part

2022

part xivxiv lineneedy expressedexpressed part

2023

hopelibrarycamp

2024

hopecamplibrary

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $28k
$10k–50k19 grants · $402k
$50k–250k1 grant · $60k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION$60,000
COMBAT BLINDNESS$40,000
AID TO ORPHANS OF MADAGASCAR$40,000
LANGLEY HILL FRIENDS$30,000
PORCHLIGHT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING$30,000
MORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FN$26,000
ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$24,000
THREE GAITS$24,000
AMAZON MEDICAL PROJECT$20,000
ROMANIAN CHRISTIAN ENTERPRISES$20,000
UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY$20,000
WISCONSIN BADGER CAMP$20,000
GOOD NEWS PROJECT$20,000
RUBIN FOR KIDS$16,000
PROJECT MERCY$16,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $199k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.7M · 43 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.7M

$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%

+39%

Still filing today

49%

31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NY
Nepal Youth Foundation
5× · 2020–2024 · $171k · revenue +26%
AT
Aid to Orphans of Madagascar
5× · 2020–2024 · $118k · revenue +38% · 36% of their budget
TG
Three Gaits
5× · 2020–2024 · $69k · revenue +47%

Funded once

LH
Langley Hill Friends(prev HCCBLHFOxfam)
one grant, 2022 · $15k
HC
Helping Children Worldwide
one grant, 2020 · $13k
P(
Porchlight (Transistional Housing)
one grant, 2020 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Make a Miracle Corp

Our mission is to bring hope and lasting change to improvished areas of Peru and Colombia. We work with individuals and communities to transform lives through education, scholarships, housing and community projects.

International

Centers of Hope Missions International Inc

Children's medical care, feeding and overall well being

International

Mano a Mano International Partners

The organization is guided by the simple premise that groups of committed individuals can reach across national boundaries to make a dramatic difference in the lives of others. the power of this premise has been demonstrated by the extent…

Housing & Shelter

Missoula Medical Aid

Missoula medical aid works with rural and impoverished communities in honduras as they seek to improve health and access to health care.

International

Orphans Hope International

—

Devworks International

Devworks international aims to make a lasting difference in the lives of millions of people living in poverty.

Human Services

Compassion International Incorporated

Releasing children from poverty in Jesus' name.

International

Misioneros Del Camino Inc

Care for orphaned, abandoned, malnourshed and developmentally disabled children in guatemala, c.a.

International

Chariots for Hope Inc

Chariots for hope shares the hope of christ by loving kenyan children through christian discipleship and long-term physical, emotional, and educational care and provision. the vision of chariots for hope is to create a transformed future…

International

Help International

The mission of help international is to empower people to fight global poverty through sustainable, life-changing development programs. our unique model allows college-aged volunteers, interns, and young professionals to contribute and…

—

Three Roots International

By partnering with vulnerable communities in ethiopia, we strive to equip vulnerable people to

International

Humanity and Hope United Foundation Inc

Humanity & Hope United is a non-profit working to assist underserved villages in remote parts of Honduras. We partner with the people of each village to achieve sustainable change, focusing on the needs of individuals rather than a single…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Inc Diocese of and the most unlike its peers is St Louis University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/27

the rest of the field

2,639/36,499

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/26

Grantees still filing

18/26

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,984,500International$426,000Human Services$218,000Recreation & Sports$69,000Youth Development$42,000Health$32,000Education$10,000Crime & Legal$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madison Community FoundationWI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madison Community Foundation · United Way of Dane County Inc · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JACK DELOSS TAYLOR CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Aid to Orphans of Madagascar.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 203737382 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Aid to Orphans of Madagascar, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 36% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jack Deloss Taylor Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Jack Deloss Taylor Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JACK DELOSS TAYLOR CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jack Deloss Taylor Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

JACK DELOSS TAYLOR CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jack Deloss Taylor Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph