· Private foundation
Jack Deloss Taylor Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $376k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
- $250k+1 grant · $260k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION | $260,000 |
| MORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FN | $76,500 |
| AID TO ORPHANS OF MADAGASCAR | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| PORCHLIGHT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS | $24,000 |
| THREE GAITS | $24,000 |
| AMAZON MEDICAL PROJECT | $20,000 |
| GOOD NEWS PROJECT | $20,000 |
| WISCONSIN BADGER CAMP | $20,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY | $20,000 |
| ROMANIAN CHRISTIAN ENTERPRISES | $20,000 |
| RUBIN FOR KIDS | $16,000 |
| PROJECT MERCY | $16,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $239k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
43 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NYNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $431k · revenue +161%
- AOADVANCING OPPORTUNITIES IN MADAGASCAR6× · 2020–2025 · $158k · revenue +26% · 36% of their budget
- MVMORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $152k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- LHLangley Hill Friends(prev HCCBLHFOxfam)one grant, 2022 · $15k
- HCHelping Children Worldwideone grant, 2020 · $13k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.
Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…
As an organization following jesus christ, mission of hope exists to bring life transformation to every man, woman, and child in haiti and the dominican republic. we desire to serve the nations of haiti and the dominican republic, and see…
In 2005, medical missions outreach began pointing others to the great physician through an annual medical missions trip to the developing world by partnering with local churches to reach their communities with the gospel. now more than 20…
The organization is guided by the simple premise that groups of committed individuals can reach across national boundaries to make a dramatic difference in the lives of others. the power of this premise has been demonstrated by the extent…
We engage with rural communities in africa by providing life-saving medical services, transformative education and empowerment opportunities, and support for at-risk and vulnerable populations to help build healthy, sustainable, and…
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Muso works to create a cure for delay because no one should die waiting for health care.
Camo is a humanitarian organization the improves the lives of the people by strengthening health care systems and promoting sustainable community development.
Assist international partners with changemakers around the world to provide solutions that save lives and build resilient communities. we accomplish our mission with actionable projects that make a lasting and sustainable impact on the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Inc Diocese of Madison and the most unlike its peers is Amazon Medical Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADVANCING OPPORTUNITIES IN MADAGASCAR ↗
- Who funds MORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THREE GAITS INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN BADGER CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds AMAZON MEDICAL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ROMANIAN CHRISTIAN ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds PORCHLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT MERCY INC ↗
- Who funds RUBIN FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON ↗
- Who funds OSMAN HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIANS IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST FLOW ↗
- Who funds BRAILLE LIBRARY & TRANSCRIBING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOLE HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONCERN AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Madison Community Foundation · United Way of Dane County Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Madison Rotary Foundation · The Oscar Rennebohm Foundation Inc · Sub-Zero Group Foundation Inc · Veridian Foundation Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jack Deloss Taylor Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jack Deloss Taylor Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Jack Deloss Taylor Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.