Skip to content
Jack D and Beverly B Finley Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jack D and Beverly B Finley Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$74kArts & Culture$72kHealth$58kRecreation & Sports$45kFood & Nutrition$38kCivil Rights$32kPublic Benefit$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$10,000
CREATIVE ARTS GUILD$10,000
SUSAN G KOMEN$10,000
ACTION FOOD PANTRY INC$5,000
DOLI ATAMIAN CAMPERSHIP PROGRAM$5,000
DEMOCRACY FORWARD$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
TENNESSEE DACHSHUND RESCUE$3,000
FOR FOX SAKE WILDLIFE RESCUE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ANGELS ON HORSEBACK: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ND
NY
MA
OR
SD
CA
KY
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$280k · 16 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
15

Total granted

$280k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+32%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsCivil RightsHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    Creative Arts Guild Incorporated
    6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +100%
  • AF
    ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +17%
  • AC
    ACTON COMMUNITY SUPPER AND FOOD PANTRY INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $19k · revenue +656%

Funded once

  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +65%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
3
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
4
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
5
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
6
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
7
Animal Nation Inc

Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.

Animals
8
Nonhuman Rights Project Inc

The Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) is the only civil rights organization in The United States dedicated solely to securing fundamental rights for nonhuman animals and the leading force in building a national and global nonhuman rights…

Animals
9
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
10
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
11
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
12
American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through advocacy and lobbying.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Democracy Forward; the most unlike its peers is Doli Atamian Campership Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientACTON COMMUNITY SUPPER AND FOOD PANTRY INC: $19,000 · OtherACTON COMMUNITY SUPPER AND FOOD PANT…NEW HOUSE ANIMAL RESCUE: $15,000 · OtherNEW HOUSE ANIMAL RESCUEPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODACTION FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 · OtherACTION FOOD PANTRY INCDEMOCRACY FORWARD: $5,000 · OtherNORTH DAKOTA BADLANDS HORSE: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherISM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherCARES FOR PICKENS: $5,000 · OtherFeeding America: $9,000 · OtherFeeding AmericaENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $8,000 · Other+3 moreCreative Arts Guild Incorporated: $62,000 · Arts & CultureCreative Arts Guild I…PRO PUBLICA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INCFOR FOX SAKE WILDLIFE RESCUE: $17,500 · AnimalsFOR FOX SAKE WIL…NEWHOUSE WILDLIFE RESCUE CORPORATION: $10,000 · AnimalsNEWHOUSE WILDLIF…PROMISED LAND DACHSHUND SANCTUARY INC: $9,500 · AnimalsPROMISED LAND DA…Horses Without Humans Rescue Organization: $7,500 · AnimalsHorses Without H…TENNESSEE DACHSHUND RESCUE: $6,000 · AnimalsTENNESSEE DACHSH…CHASING HORSES WILD HORSE ADVOCATES: $5,000 · AnimalsCHASING HORSES W…ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S F…GEORGIA MOUNTAINS HOSPICE INC: $15,000 · HealthGEORGIA MOUNT…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $10,000 · HealthThe Susan G K…DOLI ATAMIAN CAMPERSHIP PROGRAM INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyDOLI ATAMIA…HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGH…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN C…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC: $9,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN C…TREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsTREVOR PRO…THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · International
Other$121,000Arts & Culture$72,000Animals$55,500Health$45,000Philanthropy$40,000Civil Rights$34,500International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCreative Arts Guild Incorporated: $62,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetDOLI ATAMIAN CAMPERSHIP PROGRAM INC: $40,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACTON COMMUNITY SUPPER AND FOOD PANTRY INC: $19,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFOR FOX SAKE WILDLIFE RESCUE: $17,500 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetGEORGIA MOUNTAINS HOSPICE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWHOUSE WILDLIFE RESCUE CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC: $9,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPROMISED LAND DACHSHUND SANCTUARY INC: $9,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetFeeding America: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHorses Without Humans Rescue Organization: $7,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTENNESSEE DACHSHUND RESCUE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHASING HORSES WILD HORSE ADVOCATES: $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS ON HORSEBACK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack D and Beverly B Finley Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack D and Beverly B Finley Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jack D and Beverly B Finley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home