Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jack & Mary Jane Bodine Charitable Trust Brian Humes Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of JACK & MARY JANE BODINE CHARITABLE TRUST BRIAN HUMES TRUSTEE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$428k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST LOUIS ARC INC: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
OH
NJ
MO
KY
VA
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$352k · 23 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
18

Total granted

$352k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+56%

Still filing today

57%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    4× · 2018–2025 · $110k · revenue +72%
  • DD
    DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER
    3× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +2%
  • BT
    BETA THETA PI FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • MA
    Missouri Athletic Club Preservation
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • FE
    Foundry Education Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
10
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
11
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
12
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees and the most unlike its peers is World Wildlife Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 62 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%23%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr15%14%35–55yr16%55%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%19%10–20yr17%5%20–35yr15%0%35–55yr16%77%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
15%
8,053/54,646

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LADUE CHAPEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $101,367 · OtherLADUE CHAPEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHST LUKE'S HOSPITAL — $54,100 · OtherST LUKE'S HOSPITALFOUNDRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION DBA FEF — $24,100 · OtherFOUNDRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION DBA FEFMISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY — $11,200 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $10,100 · OtherMissouri Athletic Club Preservation — $10,000 · Other+24 more — $27,434 · Other+24 moreSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $110,000 · Arts & CultureSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA+3 more — $2,350 · Arts & CultureST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $17,000 · PhilanthropyAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $15,350 · Health+1 more — $100 · HealthBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION — $4,839 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $3,200 · Education+1 more — $100 · EducationDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER — $7,500 · Science & TechST LOUIS ARC INC — $2,000 · Human Services
Other$238,301Arts & Culture$112,350Philanthropy$17,000Health$15,450Education$8,139Science & Tech$7,500Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $110,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION DBA FEF — $24,100 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $15,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION — $4,839 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $3,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI ATHLETIC CLUB — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER SAINT LOUIS HONOR FLIGHT INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $1,085 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation — $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWINTER OPERA ST LOUIS — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDelta Gamma Center for Children with Vis — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds FOUNDRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION DBA FEF
  • Who funds ST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC
  • Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER
  • Who funds BETA THETA PI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MISSOURI ATHLETIC CLUB
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC
  • Who funds GREATER SAINT LOUIS HONOR FLIGHT INC
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
  • Who funds GREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
  • Who funds WINTER OPERA ST LOUIS
  • Who funds Delta Gamma Center for Children with Vis
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community FoundationMO15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jack & Mary Jane Bodine Charitable Trust Brian Humes Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jack & Mary Jane Bodine Charitable Trust Brian Humes Trustee?

    Find your warmest path to Jack & Mary Jane Bodine Charitable Trust Brian Humes Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph