Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jaburg Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$139k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$340kReligion$206kHuman Services$178kHousing & Shelter$85kPhilanthropy$75kRecreation & Sports$19kYouth Development$17kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First Place AZ$25,000
Southwest Autism Research Resource$21,000
Hillel at Arizona State University$20,000
JCRC$16,000
Valley Beit Midrash$12,500
Midwest Food Bank$10,000
Arizona Community Foundation$10,000
UMOM New Day Centers$10,000
Sounds Academy$6,500
Foster Alliance$5,000
Feeding Matters$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Challenged Athletes: $5k → 11%NOAH: $5k → 11%Gabriel's Angels: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$892k · 20 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
16

Total granted

$892k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+45%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterHealthRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VB
    VALLEY BEIT MIDRASH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $108k · revenue +135%
  • FP
    FIRST PLACE AZ
    5× · 2020–2024 · $69k · revenue +77%
  • CA
    CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $19k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • AS
    Autism Speaks
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Hope of Arizona
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • GA
    GABRIELS ANGELS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lodestar Charitable Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.

—
2
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
3
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
4
Arc of Arizona Inc

Advocates for the rights and participation of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. together with our network of members and affiliated chapters, we improve systems of support, connect families, inspire communication,…

—
5
Valle Del Sol Inc

Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.

Health
6
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
7
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
8
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
9
Abilitypath Housing

Abilitypath housing advances affordable, accessible housing projects that promote independence and inclusive communities for adults with developmental disabilities. through partnerships and innovative program designs, abilitypath housing…

Human Services
10
Home Matters to Arizona

Home matters to arizona is the first statewide home matters initiative focused on a new generation of affordable housing, connected communities, and healthier individuals, families, and economies. we add housing units while encouraging…

Housing & Shelter
11
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
12
Ymca of Southern Arizona

Ymca of southern arizona is dedicated to improving the quality of human life and helping all people realize their fullest potential through the development of spirit, mind and body. we are a powerful association of men, women and children,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Place Az; the most unlike its peers is Noah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Southwest Autism Research Resource: $262,710 · OtherSouthwest Autism Research ResourceJewish Community Center: $156,000 · OtherJewish Community CenterHillel at Arizona State University: $85,750 · OtherHillel at Arizona State UniversityJCRC: $41,000 · OtherJCRC+22 more: $132,513 · Other+22 moreVALLEY BEIT MIDRASH: $107,500 · EducationVALLEY BEIT M…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · EducationTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $5,000 · EducationFIRST PLACE AZ: $69,400 · Housing & ShelterFIRST PLA…UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterUMOM NEW …CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL A…ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · PhilanthropyFEEDING MATTERS INC: $47,500 · Health+1 more: $450 · HealthCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $18,500 · Human ServicesGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesNOAH INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesSOUNDS ACADEMY: $12,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$677,973Education$118,000Housing & Shelter$85,400Philanthropy$55,000Health$47,950Human Services$30,000Arts & Culture$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALLEY BEIT MIDRASH: $107,500 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetFIRST PLACE AZ: $69,400 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING MATTERS INC: $47,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $18,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOUNDS ACADEMY: $12,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INC: $9,300 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNOAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Joseph the Worker: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPANISH SPEAKING UNITY COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlices Kids Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VALLEY BEIT MIDRASH ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE AZ ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUNDS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds SWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GABRIELS ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NOAH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds St Joseph the Worker ↗
  • Who funds SPANISH SPEAKING UNITY COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Alices Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jaburg and Wilk Foundation IncAZ22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · Thunderbirds Charities · John F Long Foundation Inc · American Express Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Burton Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jaburg Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jaburg Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jaburg Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jaburg Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jaburg Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph