Skip to content
Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$263kReligion$109kHuman Services$93kFood & Nutrition$39kYouth Development$39kHousing & Shelter$36kAnimals$26kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SARRC$20,000
Valley Beit Midrash$12,500
Sounds Academy$5,000
Foster Alliance$5,000
UMOM New Day Centers$5,000
Midwest Family Food Bank$5,000
Phoenix Convservatory of Music$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Feeding Matters$2,500
Gabriel's Angels$1,500
Swift Youth Foundation$1,000
Cancer Support Community$750
R R Ranch AZ$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Ryan House: $5k → 11%Ryan House: $2k → 11%Ryan House: $350 → 11%STARS: $5k → 11%Audrey's Angels: $4k → 11%Audrey's Angels: $1k → 11%Audrey's Angels: $1k → 11%NOAH: $9k → 11%NOAH: $5k → 11%NOAH: $5k → 11%NOAH: $3k → 11%NOAH: $1k → 11%Gabriel's Angels: $4k → 11%Gabriel's Angels: $4k → 11%Gabriel's Angels: $3k → 11%Gabriel's Angels: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$623k · 28 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
17

Total granted

$623k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+89%

Still filing today

57%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +138%
  • VB
    VALLEY BEIT MIDRASH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +135%
  • NI
    NOAH INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $23k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • FP
    FIRST PLACE AZgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +89%
  • SV
    SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +128%
  • DM
    Desert Mission Food Bank
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
2
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
3
Arizona's Children Association

The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.

Human Services
4
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
5
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
6
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
7
Fresh Start Women's Foundation

The mission of fresh start women's foundation is to provide access and resources that help women achieve self-sufficiency and use their strength to thrive. we do this work in pursuit of our vision to create unlimited opportunities for…

Human Services
8
Onward Hope Incorporated

We are committed to improving and assisting the successful transition of at-risk young people to independent adulthood and supporting resilient families, by connecting them to resources.

Human Services
9
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
10
Free Arts for Abused Children of Arizona

Free arts for abused children of arizona (free arts) is a nonprofit organization that transforms children's trauma to resilience through the arts. since 1993, free arts has served more than 155,400 children in maricopa county in arizona.…

Crime & Legal
11
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
12
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Place Az; the most unlike its peers is Noah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Child Crisis of Arizona: $44,250 · OtherChild Crisis of ArizonaYWCA: $30,600 · OtherYWCACHILDREN IN NEED FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherCHILDREN IN NEED FOUNDATIONHope Ignites Phoenix: $16,500 · OtherHope Ignites PhoenixIndividual grant recipient: $15,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAnti-Defamation League: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherDesert Mission Food Bank: $10,000 · OtherMASK: $10,000 · OtherJewish Community Center: $10,000 · OtherGesher Disability Center: $9,100 · OtherSWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION: $11,500 · Other+19 more: $70,150 · Other+19 moreSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER: $152,500 · HealthSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOUR…FEEDING MATTERS INC: $57,500 · HealthFEEDING MATTERS INCPhoenix Children's Hospital: $21,500 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital+1 more: $4,250 · HealthVALLEY BEIT MIDRASH: $100,000 · EducationVALLEY BEIT MIDR…THE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $5,000 · EducationNOAH INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $11,500 · Human ServicesRYAN HOUSE: $7,350 · Human ServicesAUDREY'S ANGELS: $5,500 · Human ServicesSCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE AZ: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $6,250 · Housing & ShelterUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterPHOENIX CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSOUNDS ACADEMY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON: $10,000 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropySend Me on Vacation Inc: $750 · Philanthropy
Other$267,850Health$235,750Education$105,000Human Services$51,850Housing & Shelter$36,250Arts & Culture$25,000Philanthropy$15,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER: $152,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY BEIT MIDRASH: $100,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetFEEDING MATTERS INC: $57,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetFIRST PLACE AZ: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNOAH INC: $22,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital: $21,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN IN NEED FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetPHOENIX CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $11,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSOUNDS ACADEMY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRYAN HOUSE: $7,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $6,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUDREY'S ANGELS: $5,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCancer Support Community Arizona: $4,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPHOENIX LEGAL ACTION NETWORK: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSend Me on Vacation Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRR RANCH: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY BEIT MIDRASH ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE AZ ↗
  • Who funds NOAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN NEED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Hope Ignites Phoenix ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds SWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GABRIELS ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON ↗
  • Who funds SOUNDS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds RYAN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AUDREY'S ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY OF THE SUN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Support Community Arizona ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Virginia G Piper Char…Thunderbirds CharitiesAmerican Express Foun…Jaburg Family Foundat…The Board of VisitorsJohn F Long Foundatio…Valley of the Sun Uni…The Foundation for Co…The Diane and Bruce H…Jewish Community Foun…Marco Foundation
Arizona Community FoundationAZ30.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · American Express Foundation · Jaburg Family Foundation Inc · The Board of Visitors · John F Long Foundation Inc · Valley of the Sun United Way · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · Marco Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jaburg and Wilk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home