Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

J Robert Nonemaker Foundation for Small Animals Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$311kHealth$65kHuman Services$9kOther$181k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC$7,000
SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION$7,000
MISFIT ACRES$6,000
GREEN STREET RESCUE$5,000
OPKIT KITTY SPONSORSHIP INC$5,000
LUCKY CAT ADOPTIONS INC$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI$5,000
CATS EXCLUSIVE INC$5,000
THE RUNAWAYS ANIMAL RESCUE$5,000
OPERATION CATNIP$4,000
PAW WARRIORS INC$4,000
PAWS SOUTH FLORIDA RESCUE INC$4,000
OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%PETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CA
AZ
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$561k · 23 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
1

Total granted

$561k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +7%
  • SC
    SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $43k · revenue +101%
  • TO
    THE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • PT
    PILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Kitten Around Cat Rescue
Animals
3
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
4
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
5
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
6
Recycled Pets Rescue

To provide care for orphaned pets

7
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
8
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
9
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
10
PurrHarmony Inc

Rescue and shelter cats

Animals
11
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
12
Peggys Paws

Very small operation, we do T/N/R in the local area

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Runaways Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC — $43,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INCTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $37,000 · AnimalsTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INCGREEN STREET RESCUE — $32,500 · AnimalsGREEN STREET RESCUEFEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS AKA PETS OF THE HOMELESS — $30,000 · AnimalsFEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS AKA PETS OF THE HOMELESSPAWS SOUTH FLORIDA RESCUE INC — $29,500 · AnimalsPAWS SOUTH FLORIDA RESCUE INCRunaways Animal Rescue — $29,000 · AnimalsRunaways Animal RescuePAW WARRIORS INC — $26,000 · AnimalsPAW WARRIORS INCCATS IN NEED OF HUMAN CARE — $25,500 · AnimalsCATS IN NEED OF HUMAN CAREHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP — $20,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAPCATS EXCLUSIVE INC — $17,000 · AnimalsCATS EXCLUSIVE INC+3 more — $21,000 · Animals+3 moreMISFIT ACRES — $32,000 · OtherMISFIT ACRESOPERATION CATNIP — $31,500 · OtherOPERATION CATNIPBACK TO BASICS — $25,000 · OtherBACK TO BASICSPETS ARE LOVING SUPPORT — $25,000 · OtherPETS ARE LOVING SUPPORTCEASE — $21,000 · OtherCEASEPHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY CAT COUNCIL — $14,500 · OtherPHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY CAT COUNCILBACK TO BASICS PROJECT — $14,000 · OtherBACK TO BASICS PROJECTLUCKY CAT ADOPTIONS INC — $9,000 · OtherLAST CHANCE FERRET RESCUE — $8,500 · OtherNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $65,000 · HealthNATIONAL DISA…PETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION — $9,000 · Human Services
Animals$310,500Other$180,500Health$65,000Human Services$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC — $43,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $37,000 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetGREEN STREET RESCUE — $32,500 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetFEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS AKA PETS OF THE HOMELESS — $30,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPAWS SOUTH FLORIDA RESCUE INC — $29,500 over 9y, 9.0% of budgetRunaways Animal Rescue — $29,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetPAW WARRIORS INC — $26,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetCATS IN NEED OF HUMAN CARE — $25,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP — $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCATS EXCLUSIVE INC — $17,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetOPKIT KITTY SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM INC — $9,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetLUCKY CAT ADOPTIONS INC — $9,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetLAST CHANCE FERRET RESCUE — $8,500 over 4y, 17% of budgetSO CA BULLDOG RESCUE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BULLDOG RESCUE INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds THE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds GREEN STREET RESCUE
  • Who funds FEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS AKA PETS OF THE HOMELESS
  • Who funds PAWS SOUTH FLORIDA RESCUE INC
  • Who funds Runaways Animal Rescue
  • Who funds PAW WARRIORS INC
  • Who funds CATS IN NEED OF HUMAN CARE
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP
  • Who funds CATS EXCLUSIVE INC
  • Who funds PETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPKIT KITTY SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds LUCKY CAT ADOPTIONS INC
  • Who funds LAST CHANCE FERRET RESCUE
  • Who funds SO CA BULLDOG RESCUE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BULLDOG RESCUE INC
  • Who funds PILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leslie L Alexander Foundation IncFL15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · The Summerlee Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization J Robert Nonemaker Foundation for Small Animals Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    9get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to J Robert Nonemaker Foundation for Small Animals Inc?

    Find your warmest path to J Robert Nonemaker Foundation for Small Animals Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph