Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

J Reid and Louise H Barton Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Health$244kReligion$152kInternational$127kCommunity Improvement$108kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kHuman Services$8kArts & Culture$5kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$17,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILSON REHABILIATION FOUNDATION INC$20,082
ENDLESS MOUNTANS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER$17,500
WYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES$17,500
RYANS CASE FOR SMILES$15,000
THE KIRBY BAND$5,082
NICHOLS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RYANS CASE FOR SMILES: $15k → 6%RYANS CASE FOR SMILES: $15k → 6%RYANS CASE FOR SMILES: $13k → 6%RYANS CASE FOR SMILES: $12k → 6%RYANS CASE FOR SMILES: $12k → 6%RYANS CASE FOR SMILES: $12k → 6%RYANS CASE FOR SMILES: $5k → 6%BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES - CHOW: $5k → 20%BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES - CHOW: $5k → 20%BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES - CHOW: $5k → 20%BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES - CHOW: $5k → 20%BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES - CHOW: $5k → 20%BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES - CHOW: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
CO
VA
KS
TN
SC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 24% of J Reid and Louise H Barton Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 36% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 32% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

J Reid and Louise H Barton Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$610k · 21 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
7

Total granted

$610k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+39%

Still filing today

48%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesInternationalHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RYAN'S CASE FOR SMILES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $84k · revenue +92%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    6× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +16%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • LH
    LIVING HOPE CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • ON
    OWEGO NAZARENE CHURCH NMI
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • FS
    FIRST STEP HELPING CHILDREN WITH CLUBFOOT - WONDERWORK
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
2
Faith Aid

The organization cares for the sick and suffering in Jesus name by partnering with Christian mission hospitals, helping patients unable to afford treatment, and supporting Mustard Seed House ministry locations in Kenya.

International
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
6
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
7
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
8
Servenow

Sharing Christ's Passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services
9
International Faith Missions

Aid to destitute in haiti

International
10
Mcm International

Establishing and supporting churches, orphanges, and schools and supporting ministers and womens ministries in east asia, honduras, kenya, uganda and ukraine.

International
11
World Christian Broadcasting Corporation

World christian broadcasting exists so that people in places best served by broadcast media become aware of the good news of jesus christ and want to know more. geographic areas that cannot be easily served by missionaries are a priority.

Arts & Culture
12
Siloam Health

Siloam shares the love of christ by providing affordable, whole-person care to the uninsured & underserved that addresses the physical, emotional, spiritual, & social determinants of health.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Life Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ryan's Case for Smiles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WILSON REHABILITATION FOUNDATION INC — $107,582 · OtherWILSON REHABILITATION FOUNDATION INCWYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INC — $107,500 · OtherWYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INCENDLESS MOUNTANS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $37,500 · OtherENDLESS MOUNTANS PREGNANCY CARE CENTERNICHOLS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $35,000 · OtherNICHOLS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHWORLD OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $30,000 · OtherWORLD OF HOPE INTERNATIONALJESUS FILM HARVEST PARTNERS — $30,000 · OtherJESUS FILM HARVEST PARTNERSHE'S ALIVE MINISTRIES — $20,000 · OtherOUTREACH FOUNDATION OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC — $18,000 · Other+14 more — $45,582 · Other+14 moreRYAN'S CASE FOR SMILES — $84,000 · Human ServicesRYAN'S CASE FOR SMI…Broome County Council of Churches — $30,000 · Human ServicesBroome County Counc…Compassion International Incorporated — $30,000 · InternationalCompassion…AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC — $30,000 · InternationalAMERICAN L…International Christian Concern Inc — $35,000 · ReligionUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · HealthLOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · HealthFOREST LAKE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY — $7,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$431,164Human Services$114,000International$60,000Religion$35,000Health$13,500Public Safety & Disaster$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILSON REHABILITATION FOUNDATION INC — $107,582 over 7y, 23% of budgetRYAN'S CASE FOR SMILES — $84,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetInternational Christian Concern Inc — $35,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBroome County Council of Churches — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOUTREACH FOUNDATION OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC — $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOREST LAKE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY — $7,500 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMONTROSE MINUTE MEN INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROOME COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRURAL MISSION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILSON REHABILITATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds RYAN'S CASE FOR SMILES
  • Who funds International Christian Concern Inc
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC
  • Who funds Broome County Council of Churches
  • Who funds OUTREACH FOUNDATION OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC
  • Who funds FOREST LAKE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
  • Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MONTROSE MINUTE MEN INC
  • Who funds BROOME COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds RURAL MISSION
  • Who funds FAMILY LIFE MINISTRIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization J Reid and Louise H Barton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph