Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Ralph and Lois Stone Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$245k
Granted FY2022
20
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of J Ralph and Lois Stone Family Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year J Ralph and Lois Stone Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $245k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
9
’18
7
’19
8
’20
8
’21
7
’22
7
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$4.7MFood & Nutrition$265kYouth Development$202kHuman Services$165kAnimals$65kPublic Safety & Disaster$65kEnvironment$45kInternational$40kOther$0
02FY2022 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $220k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK$20,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CAMP PALS$15,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$15,000
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT$15,000
COMMUNITY OF CHRIST - NOVATO YOUTH$10,000
CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT$10,000
YOUNG LIFE - SAN RAMON$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA ROSA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNITED ANGLERS OF CASA GRANDE$10,000
ACHIEVE TAHOE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FRIDAY NIGHT OUT: $20k → 9%CAMP PALS: $15k → 10%FRIDAY NIGHT OUT: $15k → 9%CAMP PALS: $15k → 10%FRIDAY NIGHT OUT: $15k → 9%FRIDAY NIGHT OUT: $15k → 9%FRIDAY NIGHT OUT: $10k → 9%FRIDAY NIGHT OUT: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 27 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +61% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
21

Total granted

$1.3M
$207k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+61%

Still filing today

33%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthCivil RightsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RE
    REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +118%
  • FN
    Friday Night Out
    6× · 2018–2023 · $78k · revenue +14% · 55% of their budget
  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $65k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • NB
    North Bay Fire Relief
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • SF
    SRHS Foundation Fire Relief Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
2
Sonoma County Family Ymca

Sonoma county family ymca seeks to enhance the lives of all people through programs designed to develop spirit, mind and body. at the y, strengthening our community is our cause. we believe that positive, lasting personal and social change…

Human Services
3
Special Olympics Northern California Inc

Special olympics provides athletic opportunities to children and adults with intellectual disabilities to instill the confidence needed to succeed in life.

Recreation & Sports
4
Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County

We are a catalyst of equitable transformation, aligning partners and resources to implement values-based, data-driven, community-led solutions that help families reach their full potential. our vision - we see sonoma county transformed…

Community Improvement
5
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
6
California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association

California casa was founded in 1987. its mission is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering…

Civil Rights
7
Di Rosa Preserve

Located in scenic Napa Valley, di Rosa Center for Contemporary Art engages its community in the connective power of art and nature through its permanent collection of Northern California art, contemporary exhibitions, and thought-provoking…

Arts & Culture
8
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc

CASA recruits, trains, and supports community volunteers who advocate for chidren and youth throughout their journey in foster care.

Crime & Legal
9
Down Syndrome Association of Central California

To enhance the quality of life for all people whose lives are touched by Down Syndrome

Health
10
Inclusion Revolution Inc a California Nonprofit Corporation

Camp Revolution provides a safe, fun and motivational overnight outdoor camping experience for differently-abled teens and adults. Our goal is to empower each camper with confidence, boost self-esteem, experience outdoor adventures and…

Human Services
11
Casa of San Mateo County

The Organization recruits, trains and supports adult community volunteers who are assigned to advocate for youth, ages 0 through 21, who are in the child welfare or juvenile justice system. These volunteers are often the only consistent…

Crime & Legal
12
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance; the most unlike its peers is The Zones. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $4,639,258 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient: $125,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…Individual grant recipient: $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…MEALS ON WHEELS: $120,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…Individual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…North Bay Fire Relief: $50,000 · OtherFISH: $45,000 · OtherCAMP PALS: $43,610 · OtherVALLEY OF THE MOON CHILDRENS FDTN: $40,000 · Other+30 more: $341,500 · Other+30 moreFriday Night Out: $77,500 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $30,000 · Human ServicesPALS Programs: $30,000 · Human ServicesREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $140,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED ANGLERS OF CASA GRANDE INC: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ZONES: $38,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentDOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA: $15,000 · HealthCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$4,644,258Other$1,000,110Human Services$202,500Food & Nutrition$140,000Youth Development$108,000Health$15,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $4,639,258 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $140,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFriday Night Out: $77,500 over 6y, 55% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ANGLERS OF CASA GRANDE INC: $45,000 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetTHE ZONES: $38,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPALS Programs: $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVE TAHOE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE REDWOOD EMPIRE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Friday Night Out ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ANGLERS OF CASA GRANDE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ZONES ↗
  • Who funds THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PALS Programs ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVE TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA ↗
  • Who funds CONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE REDWOOD EMPIRE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Ralph and Lois Stone Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Ralph and Lois Stone Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J Ralph and Lois Stone Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph