Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Ford Crandall Depository

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$288k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$202kHuman Services$201kHealth$165kEducation$160kCommunity Improvement$124kFood & Nutrition$123kReligion$95kRecreation & Sports$74kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $247k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN$25,000
POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT$25,000
YOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$22,540
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$20,595
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,474
HEART REACH MINISTRIES$15,000
YMCA OF YOUNGSTOWN$15,000
HELMS FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
MCGUFFEY CENTRE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$14,500
BOARDMAN COMMUNITY BASEBALL$12,000
MOAB INC$12,000
OAKHILL COLLABORATIVE INC$8,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%GOLDEN STRING INC: $25k → 19%PAISLEY HOUSE: $15k → 19%PAISLEY HOUSE: $14k → 19%POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: $25k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 26 repeat orgs$631k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
32

Total granted

$1.1M
$499k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+38%

Still filing today

35%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $132k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YC
    YOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +407%
  • SM
    STUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k · revenue +86%
  • PH
    PAISLEY HOUSE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $29k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • RM
    REUBEN MCMILLIAN FREE LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • CF
    COMPASS FAMILY AND
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Theatre Y

Create connections between diverse artists seeking mutual growth through collaboration.

Arts & Culture
2
Art Opportunities Inc

To create community driven public art and launch careers for youth and artists.

Arts & Culture
3
Yellowstone Behavioral Health

Provide quality mental health services to residents of park county

—
4
Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

Human Services
5
Coleman Center Board of the City of York Term

The coleman center for the arts, cca, is a contemporary arts organization that uses art to foster positive social change, answer civic needs, build local pride, and use creativity for community problem solving.

Arts & Culture
6
Youngstown Area Goodwill Industries Inc

Youngstown area goodwill industries actively strives to achieve full participation in society of people with disabilities and special needs by expanding opportunities, capabilities, and independence.

—
7
Yorktown Community Development Corporation

Plan and develop housing for low to moderate income families and elder residents in the yorktown neighborhood of the city of philadelphia, pa and to conduct other programs to address the general resident concerns.

Community Improvement
8
The Arts Commission of Greater Toledo I

To develop and promote arts in the greater toledo community

Arts & Culture
9
Youngstown Area Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee

To provide training to electrical apprentices in mahoning and trumbull counties, and through that training to provide skilled workers to area employers.

Employment
10
Art Possible Ohio

Art possible ohio makes the arts and arts education experiences more accessible and inclusive for people with any disabilities and their support networks.

Arts & Culture
11
Southeast Ohio Youth Mentoring

Supervision for needy children

—
12
Youth Service Bureau of Porter County Inc

To support children and families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youngstown Neighborhood Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is The English Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $120,595 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $69,512 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUNGSTOWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherYWCA: $50,000 · OtherEASTER SEALS: $48,852 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $47,540 · Other+42 more: $752,040 · Other+42 moreOH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA JONES CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR SCIENCE & TECH: $75,000 · Arts & CultureOH WOW THE…STUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureSTUDENTS M…BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBUTLER INS…HENRY H STAMBAUGH AUDITORIUM ASSOC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureHENRY H ST…THE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE YOUNGS…YOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC: $60,000 · Community ImprovementOak Hill Collaborative Inc: $24,750 · Community ImprovementSIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC: $41,602 · HealthHelms Foundation: $15,000 · HealthYELLOW BRICK PLACE: $14,980 · HealthCOLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC: $10,000 · HealthPAISLEY HOUSE: $29,180 · Human ServicesPOTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN STRING INC: $24,960 · Human ServicesPROJECT MKC: $19,996 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNGSTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $18,418 · Housing & ShelterON TARGET OUTFITTERS: $11,900 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,263,539Arts & Culture$165,000Community Improvement$84,750Health$81,582Human Services$79,140Youth Development$19,996Housing & Shelter$18,418Recreation & Sports$11,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA JONES CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR SCIENCE & TECH: $75,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC: $60,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetSIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC: $41,602 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetSTUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetPAISLEY HOUSE: $29,180 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetBOARDMAN COMMUNITY BASEBALL INC: $27,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHENRY H STAMBAUGH AUDITORIUM ASSOC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGOLDEN STRING INC: $24,960 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetOak Hill Collaborative Inc: $24,750 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetMERIDIAN HEALTHCARE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT MKC: $19,996 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $18,418 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYELLOW BRICK PLACE: $14,980 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetON TARGET OUTFITTERS: $11,900 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCOLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ENGLISH CENTER: $4,400 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA JONES CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR SCIENCE & TECH ↗
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAISLEY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BOARDMAN COMMUNITY BASEBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY H STAMBAUGH AUDITORIUM ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN STRING INC ↗
  • Who funds Oak Hill Collaborative Inc ↗
  • Who funds MERIDIAN HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT MKC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Mahoning ValleyOH47.1× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · Youngstown Fdn General · Premier Bank Foundation · Frank & Pearl Gelbman Charitable Fdn · The Raymond John Wean Foundation · Walter E & Caroline H Watson Trust · Florence S Beecher Fdn · Senator Maurice & Florence Lipscher Char · Aimee and Lulu Seidel Trust · E M Barr Tw Charitable Trust · Frances Schermer Charitable Trust 41-46496008 · W&H Bender Memorial Fund Xxxxx8005

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Ford Crandall Depository funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Ford Crandall Depository. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J Ford Crandall Depository’s filings →

    More from the funding graph