Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

J Edward Mahoney Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$245k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$648kRecreation & Sports$315kEducation$261kHealth$245kFood & Nutrition$100kCommunity Improvement$50kHuman Services$50kReligion$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $195k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Second Story Foundation$50,000
Marist High School$40,000
Humane Society Spay & Neuter Program$25,000
Friends of the Pool$25,000
Guilhaus$25,000
Stray Haven Inc$20,000
Holistic Riding Equestrian Therapy$20,000
Cornerstone Academy$20,000
TLC Animal Shelter$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Joliet Area Community Hospice: $50k → 7%Cancer Support Center: $15k → 14%Ready Set Ride: $17k → 7%Ready Set Ride: $13k → 7%Ready Set Ride: $11k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 13 repeat orgs$348k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$303k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+39%

Still filing today

62%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE POOL INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $245k · revenue +150% · 63% of their budget
  • TS
    THE SECOND STORY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $70k · revenue +112%
  • G
    GUILDHAUS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • PO
    Pathway of Palos Park and the Center
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
  • HL
    Hope & Love of the Laity
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • L
    Lightways
    one grant, 2021 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laurels House

Laurel's House strengthens the human animal bond improves public health decreases the number of companion animal euthanasia due to overpopulation and diminishes human impact on native wildlife species by providing unprecedented access to…

2
Illinois Horse Rescue of Will County Inc

The organization was founded to provide shelter and care for mistreated or abandoned horses. they provide shelter, food and veterinary services for these animals until a suitable home can be found. as a secondary service, they provide…

Animals
3
Far Side Journey Incorporated

Far Side Journey provides rescue critical veterinary care foster placement and adoption for at-risk shelter dogs and stray cats. The organization also operates a public cat lounge to promote adoptions community involvement and animal…

Animals
4
Paws and Claws Rescue Inc

Paws and Claws Cat Rescue is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to preventing and alleviating the suffering caused by abuse, neglect, and overpopulation. We help cats mentally and physically heal, and give them a chance to find love, a full…

Animals
5
Felines Inc

Providing a safe and loving shelter to cats and dogs until their permanent adoptive home is found.

Animals
6
Hinsdale Humane Society

To prevent animal suffering and neglect throughout our community and beyond, and to ensure that all animals in shelters and homes are well cared for and treated with compassion.

Animals
7
Greek American Rehabilitation and Care Centre

To provide quality nursing home care to the elderly with genuine hospitality.

8
Gateway Horseworks

Gateway horseworks incorporates horses for the mental health treatment of people

Health
9
Hooves & Paws Animal Rescue Inc

To rescue and provide medical treatment for abused and abandoned animals; to rehabilitate rescued animals and find permanent placement in loving adoptive homes; to provide loving lifelong care at our sanctuary for those animals who are not…

Animals
10
Illinois Equine Humane Center Nfp

Equine rescue from physical abuse, starvation, or owner relinquishment. ILEHC provides shelter, pasture, feed, hay, medical, dental, transportation particularly with getting a new rescue from quarantine to our facility, farrier treatments…

Animals
11
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
12
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holistic Riding Equestrian Therapy and the most unlike its peers is Lulus Locker Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TLC Animal Shelter — $221,500 · OtherTLC Animal ShelterMARIST HIGH SCHOOL — $135,000 · OtherMARIST HIGH SCHOOLSTRAY HAVEN INC — $113,000 · OtherSTRAY HAVEN INCPathway of Palos Park and the Center — $70,000 · OtherPathway of Palos Park and the CenterAmer Veterans Service Dog Academy — $60,000 · OtherAmer Veterans Service Dog AcademyHope & Love of the Laity — $50,000 · OtherHope & Love of the LaityDAN CARE CENTER — $50,000 · OtherDAN CARE CENTERLightways — $50,000 · OtherLightwaysIndividual grant recipient — $35,000 · Other+3 more — $58,000 · Other+3 moreFRIENDS OF THE POOL INC — $245,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE POOL INCCornerstone Academy co Richard Van der Molen — $126,000 · EducationCornerstone Academy co …WHISKERS & PAWS FOREVER OF MONROE CTY — $185,000 · AnimalsWHISKERS & PA…LULUS LOCKER RESCUE — $30,000 · AnimalsLULUS LOCKER …THE SECOND STORY FOUNDATION — $70,000 · HealthGUILDHAUS — $50,000 · HealthHOLISTIC RIDING EQUESTRIAN THERAPY — $20,000 · HealthJoliet Area Community Hospice Corp — $50,000 · Human ServicesREADY SET RIDE THERAPEUTIC RECREATION FACILITY — $40,304 · Human ServicesJENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER — $15,000 · Human ServicesNAVARRO FARM INC — $100,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$842,500Education$371,000Animals$215,000Health$140,000Human Services$105,304Food & Nutrition$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE POOL INC — $245,000 over 4y, 63% of budgetWHISKERS & PAWS FOREVER OF MONROE CTY — $185,000 over 4y, 56% of budgetCornerstone Academy co Richard Van der Molen — $126,000 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetNAVARRO FARM INC — $100,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE SECOND STORY FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetGUILDHAUS — $50,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetJoliet Area Community Hospice Corp — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREADY SET RIDE THERAPEUTIC RECREATION FACILITY — $40,304 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetLULUS LOCKER RESCUE — $30,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetJENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE POOL INC
  • Who funds WHISKERS & PAWS FOREVER OF MONROE CTY
  • Who funds Cornerstone Academy co Richard Van der Molen
  • Who funds NAVARRO FARM INC
  • Who funds THE SECOND STORY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GUILDHAUS
  • Who funds Joliet Area Community Hospice Corp
  • Who funds READY SET RIDE THERAPEUTIC RECREATION FACILITY
  • Who funds LULUS LOCKER RESCUE
  • Who funds HOLISTIC RIDING EQUESTRIAN THERAPY
  • Who funds JENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization J Edward Mahoney Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to J Edward Mahoney Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to J Edward Mahoney Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph