Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

J Campbell Murrell Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.1M
Granted FY2023
23
Grants FY2023
9
States reached
$875k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$1.9MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$739kFood & Nutrition$500kCommunity Improvement$315kInternational$285kArts & Culture$221kYouth Development$218kOther$0
02FY2023 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 23 grants below total $2,159,845 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,110,345 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $950,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $227k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $500k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$875,000
GOSPEL COALITIONS (HQ)$282,000
AUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CHURCH$270,627
BETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY$100,000
GOSPEL COALITIONS (AUSTIN)$100,000
FELLOWSHIP FOR THE PERFORMING$100,000
TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION$50,000
BREAKAWAY MINISTRIES$50,000
AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES$50,000
PELETONU$50,000
HELPING HAND HOME$36,256
AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$25,000
STANFORD UNIVERISTY (HOOVER INS$25,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE (BRIDGES INTL)$25,000
YOUNG LIFE -COLLEGE (TX552)$25,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 20 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
27

Total granted

$2.9M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+1%

Still filing today

35%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
EducationReligionSocial ScienceCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GRAMEEN AMERICA INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $300k · revenue +155%
  • AN
    AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $260k · revenue +40%
  • PI
    PELOTONU INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • ML
    MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • GC
    GOSPEL COALITION
    one grant, 2022 · $300k
  • TA
    TEXAS A&M FOUDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
3
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
4
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
5
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
6
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
7
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
8
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
9
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
10
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
11
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
12
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Austin Lifecare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%40%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr10%15%35–55yr13%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%51%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr10%32%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,780

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE AUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CHURCH — $733,127 · OtherTHE AUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CHURCHHELPING HAND HOME — $557,056 · OtherHELPING HAND HOMEMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC (CFV) — $500,000 · OtherMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC (CFV)GOSPEL COALITION (HQ) — $300,000 · OtherGOSPEL COALITION (HQ)GOSPEL COALITIONS (HQ) — $282,000 · OtherGOSPEL COALITIONS (HQ)TEXAS A&M FOUDATION — $250,000 · OtherWATERLOO SCHOOL — $190,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE - MILITARY FAMILY CAMP — $185,000 · Other+41 more — $1,804,639 · Other+41 moreTexas A&M Foundation — $875,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL — $260,000 · EducationAFRICA NEW LIFE MINIST…PELOTONU INC — $150,000 · EducationPELOTONU INC+2 more — $25,000 · EducationGRAMEEN AMERICA INC — $300,000 · Community ImprovementI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $85,000 · Public BenefitAustin Lifecare — $35,000 · HealthSIDE BY SIDE KIDS INC — $32,000 · Human Services
Other$4,801,822Education$1,310,000Community Improvement$300,000Philanthropy$100,000Public Benefit$85,000Health$35,000Human Services$32,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $875,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGRAMEEN AMERICA INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL — $260,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE REFUGE FOR DMST — $150,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPELOTONU INC — $150,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE — $100,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAustin Lifecare — $35,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSIDE BY SIDE KIDS INC — $32,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREGENTS SCHOOL OF AUSTIN INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE GOD OF HOPE MINISTRIES — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAUSTIN DISASTER RELIEF NETWORK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Reach Project — $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation
  • Who funds GRAMEEN AMERICA INC
  • Who funds AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds THE REFUGE FOR DMST
  • Who funds PELOTONU INC
  • Who funds I LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE
  • Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Austin Lifecare
  • Who funds SIDE BY SIDE KIDS INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS24.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to J Campbell Murrell Fund?

Find your warmest path to J Campbell Murrell Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $3.3M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph