Skip to content

· Private foundation

J B & Margaret Blaugrund Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$152k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$136kArts & Culture$127kHealth$115kInternational$90kReligion$89kFood & Nutrition$62kCivil Rights$44kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES$40,000
MAYO CLINIC$40,000
EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER FOOD BAN$10,000
UTEP$10,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
ANNUNCIATION HOUSE$8,000
GREATER TURNING INSTITUTE$5,000
THE HILL SCHOOL$5,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
NAHALAT SHALOM$3,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$1,000
KTEP$1,000
PBS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO CLINIC: $40k → 9%THE HILL SCHOOL: $5k → 7%STANDORD UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%GREATER TURNING INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%UTEP: $10k → 21%ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM: $10k → 14%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%SHINER'S CHILDRENS HOSP: $5k → 13%DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $5k → 17%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%MAYO CLINIC: $40k → 9%THE HILL SCHOOL: $5k → 7%STANDORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 17%UTEPANN AND ALVIN SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10k → 21%ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM: $10k → 14%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%SHINER'S CHILDRENS HOSP: $5k → 13%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 17%UTEP: $10k → 21%ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5k → 14%SHINER'S CHILDRENS HOSP: $5k → 13%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 17%UTEP: $10k → 21%INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES: $40k → 14%SHINER'S CHILDRENS HOSP: $5k → 13%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES: $40k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES: $40k → 14%NAHALOT SHALOM HOME: $8k → 14%EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER FOOD BAN: $10k → 21%516 ARTS: $10k → 14%EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER FOOD BAN: $10k → 21%EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER FOOD BAN: $10k → 21%ANNUNCIATION HOUSE: $16k → 21%FIGHTING HUNGER BANK: $12k → 21%FIGHTING HUNGER BANK: $10k → 21%ANNUNCIATION HOUSE: $10k → 21%ANNUNCIATION HOUSE: $10k → 21%ANNUNCIATION HOUSE: $8k → 21%ANNUNCIATION HOUSE: $8k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
IA
IN
PA
RI
CA
NM
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$754k · 25 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
18

Total granted

$754k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+19%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsEducationInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES
    5× · 2018–2025 · $130k · revenue +21%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +145%
  • EP
    EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • AM
    ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • UA
    UTEPANN AND ALVIN SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
6
Santa Fe Institute

The santa fe institute is a transdisciplinary research community that expands the boundaries of scientific understanding. its aim is to discover, comprehend, and communicate the common fundamental principles in complex physical,…

Science & Tech
7
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
8
University of New Mexico Foundation Inc

Create powerful engagements and partnerships that lead to increased philanthropy, investment, innovation, and support for the university of new mexico.

Education
9
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Associated Universities Inc

Associated universities inc (aui) collaborates with the scientific community and research sponsors to plan, build, and operate cutting-edge facilities. we cultivate excellence, deliver value, enhance education, and engage the public.

Science & Tech
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Working America Education Fund; the most unlike its peers is Borderland Rainbow Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO: $70,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASOANNUNCIATION HOUSE INC: $67,000 · OtherANNUNCIATION HOUSE INCIMPACT PROGRAMS OF EXCELLENCE: $52,000 · OtherIMPACT PROGRAMS OF EXCELLENCEPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $40,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODFIGHTING HUNGER BANK: $37,000 · OtherFIGHTING HUNGER BANKIndividual grant recipient: $26,000 · OtherALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM: $20,000 · OtherKIDS EXCEL OF EL PASO: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherBROWN UNIVERSITY: $21,000 · Other+24 more: $159,000 · Other+24 moreINSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES: $130,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR PO…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KI…MAYO CLINIC: $80,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $55,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsBORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $4,000 · Civil RightsTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationTHE HILL SCHOOL: $14,000 · EducationWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $26,000 · Arts & Culture516 Arts: $13,000 · Arts & CultureEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $35,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$532,500International$145,000Health$135,000Civil Rights$44,000Education$40,000Arts & Culture$39,000Food & Nutrition$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES: $130,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $55,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT PROGRAMS OF EXCELLENCE: $52,000 over 3y, 37% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $26,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget516 Arts: $13,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION NOEL: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOLLECTIVE HERITAGE INSTITUTE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBosque School: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AURELIA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT PROGRAMS OF EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds 516 Arts ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION NOEL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Center for Educational InitiativesNM13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Center for Educational Initiatives · El Paso Community Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J B & Margaret Blaugrund Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J B & Margaret Blaugrund Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J B & Margaret Blaugrund’s filings →

    More from the funding graph