Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Minnesota · Private foundation

Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
24
Itemized grants FY2024
23
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$9k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$350
Largest grant, FY2024
$700
Organizations funded a year
23 to 27
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$250k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Civil RightsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving24$9k0%
FY202323$8k0%
FY202224$9k17%
FY202127$10kn/a
86% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$14kHuman Services$11kRecreation & Sports$10kYouth Development$4kHealth$4kHousing & Shelter$4kFood & Nutrition$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Senior Community Services$2,00040%
Sha Arim Inc$1,25040%
Project for Pride in Living Inc$1,25040%
Sharing and Caring Hands Inc$1,25040%
Pollinator Friendly Alliance Inc$1,25041%
Guild$1,25040%
Simpson Housing Services Inc$1,25040%
Pacer Center Inc$95030%
Agate Housing & Services Inc$95030%
Chabad Academy Inc$9503n/a
Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Senior Community Services$2,00040%
Sha Arim Inc$1,25040%
Project for Pride in Living Inc$1,25040%
Sharing and Caring Hands Inc$1,25040%
Pollinator Friendly Alliance Inc$1,25041%
Guild$1,25040%
Simpson Housing Services Inc$1,25040%
Pacer Center Inc$95030%
Agate Housing & Services Inc$95030%
Chabad Academy Inc$9503n/a
Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless$40010%
Fraser$30010%
House of Charity$3001n/a

Plus 18 recipients with no EIN on record ($23k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSenior Community Services: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSha Arim Inc: $1,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetProject for Pride in Living Inc: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSharing and Caring Hands Inc: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPollinator Friendly Alliance Inc: $1,250 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGuild: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSimpson Housing Services Inc: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPacer Center Inc: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAgate Housing & Services Inc: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFraser: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis Found…Minneapolis Jewish Fe…Edina Realty Foundati…Otto Bremer TrustMightycause Charitabl…Shavlik Family Charit…Margaret a Cargill Fo…The Richard M Schulze…Saint Paul & Minnesot…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
The Minneapolis FoundationMN17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Minneapolis Jewish Federation · Edina Realty Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Shavlik Family Charitable Trust · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider?

Find your warmest path to Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider

How much does Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider give?
Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider reported 24 itemized grants totaling $9,425, out of $11,775 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 23 and 27 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (14%), Human Services (12%), Recreation & Sports (10%).
Who are Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Senior Community Services ($2k), Sha Arim Inc ($1k), Project for Pride in Living Inc ($1k).
Does Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Minneapolis Foundation, Minneapolis Jewish Federation, Edina Realty Foundation.
Where is Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider based?
Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $12k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Iwj Charitable Foundation Co Charles Schneider’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home