Skip to content
Iupat District Council No 21 at a glance

· Public charity

Iupat District Council No 21

The objects of iupat district council no.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$180kYouth Development$141kArts & Culture$130kHealth$81kEmployment$61kReligion$26kCrime & Legal$25kRecreation & Sports$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $54,650, the rows itemized in this filing. The $103,303 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $48,653 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $44k
$10,400
Median grant
3
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACK COSTELLO BOXING CLUB$12,500
ATLANTICARE FOUNDATION$11,000
DRYWALL & INTERIOR SYSTEMS CONTRACT ASSN OF NJ INC IND PROMO FUND$10,400
PEOPLE'S ORGANIZATION FOR PROGRESS$10,000
SFTA FOUNDATION$5,500
UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PATCH FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%SUPERHERO PROJECT INC: $7k → 7%PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATIVE BLCAK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%FRIENDS OF LABOR: $8k → 22%LAANE: $8k → 14%DC 78 LABOR MANAGEMENT FUND: $20k → 13%UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%SFTA FOUNDATION: $6k → 6%DRYWALL & INTERIOR SYSTEMS CONTRACT ASSN OF NJ INC IND PROMO FUND: $10k → 7%CAPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%ATLANTICARE FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%PATCH FOUNDATION: $36k → 6%PATCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%SUPERHERO PROJECT INC: $6k → 7%CONGREGATION BETH SOLOMON: $10k → 22%DRYWALL & INTERIOR SYSTEMS CONTRACT ASSN OF NJ INC IND PROMO FUND: $8k → 7%CONGREGATION BETH SOLOMON: $10k → 22%DRYWALL & INTERIOR SYSTEMS CONTRACT ASSN OF NJ INC IND PROMO FUND: $7k → 7%IUPAT DC 21 RALPH WILLIAMS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $174k → 22%CONGREGATION BETH SOLOMON: $6k → 22%JACK COSTELLO BOXING CLUB: $13k → 22%PHILADELPHIA COUNCIL AFL-CIO: $6k → 22%THE PHILADELPHIA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $43k → 22%THE CECILIA DOUGHERTY TRUST FUND: $60k → 22%THE CECILIA DOUGHERTY TRUST FUND: $40k → 22%BOBBY HENON LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $25k → 22%THE CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA: $10k → 22%THE CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$325k · 6 repeat orgs$367k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$325k
$322k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+27%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES FOR CHILDREN'S HOPE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2022 · $141k · revenue +14%
  • DA
    Drywall and Interior Systems Contr ASSOC INC OF NJIPF
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +18%
  • TS
    THE SUPERHERO PROJECT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • ID
    IUPAT DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 RALPH WILLIAMS SCHOLARSHIP FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $174k · revenue +60% · 52% of their budget
  • RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGIONgraduated
    2× · 2017–2018 · $43k · revenue +228%
  • BH
    BOBBY HENON LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Federation of Labor & Phila Building Trades Council Afl-Cio

The objectives of the philadelphia building trades council are to enlist the voluntary cooperation and support of every eligible local union to the end that wage scales and desirable working conditions may be established and maintained in…

—
2
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
3
Police Athletic League of Philadelphia
Youth Development
4
1199C National Union of Hospital and Health Care

Labor union to support collective bargaining for its members, conducting membership meetings, education, organizing events to further the common interests of the membership.

—
5
Golf Association of Philadelphia Foundation
Recreation & Sports
6
New Jersey Superior Officers Law Enforcement Association

The mutual protection and benefit of all its members.

Philanthropy
7
Pennsylvania Builders Association

Incorporated in 1945, the pennsylvania builders association is a nonprofit professional trade organization representing approximately 4,066 members from across the commonwealth. pba members include contractors, builders, and remodelers,…

—
8
Philadelphia Area Labor-Management Committee Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster increased labor-management cooperation in southern pennsylvania, including bucks, chester, delaware, montgomery and philadelphia counties.

—
9
Pennsylvania Society of Sons of the Revolution
—
10
Ppf Pennsylvania State Association

Promote the interest and welfare of the industry by recommending legislation to protect the trade.

—
11
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
12
Eastern Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters

Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Afl-Cio Philadelphia Council; the most unlike its peers is Philadelphia Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IUPAT DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 RALPH WILLIAMS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $174,235 · OtherIUPAT DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 RALPH WILLIAMS SCHOLARSHIP FUNDTHE CECILIA DOUGHERTY TRUST FUND: $100,000 · OtherTHE CECILIA DOUGHERTY TRUST FUNDRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION: $43,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGIONCONGREGATION BETH SOLOMON: $25,600 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SOLOMONDrywall and Interior Systems Contr ASSOC INC OF NJIPF: $25,400 · OtherDrywall and Interior Systems Contr ASSOC INC OF NJIPFBOBBY HENON LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $25,000 · OtherBOBBY HENON LEGAL DEFENSE FUNDDC 78 LABOR MANAGEMENT FUND: $20,000 · Other+7 more: $50,950 · Other+7 morePAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES FOR CHILDREN'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $141,058 · PhilanthropyPAINTERS AND ALLIED TRA…CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA: $20,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SUPERHERO PROJECT INC: $13,000 · HealthLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $7,500 · HealthCAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthJACK COSTELLO BOXING CLUB: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsPENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsFORT FREEDOM INC: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$464,185Philanthropy$141,058Arts & Culture$30,000Health$26,500Recreation & Sports$12,500Civil Rights$10,000Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIUPAT DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 RALPH WILLIAMS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $174,235 over 1y, 52% of budgetPAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES FOR CHILDREN'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $141,058 over 4y, 17% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION: $43,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDrywall and Interior Systems Contr ASSOC INC OF NJIPF: $25,400 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SUPERHERO PROJECT INC: $13,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetJACK COSTELLO BOXING CLUB: $12,500 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT FREEDOM INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAFL-CIO PHILADELPHIA COUNCIL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sheet Metal Workers L…Amazonsmile Foundation
Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Association Local 19PA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Association Local 19 · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iupat District Council No 21 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iupat District Council No 21. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iupat District Council No 21’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home