Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

It's Possible Foundation Inc

THE FOUNDATION MAKES GRANTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUPPORTING A WIDE ARRAY OF SERVICES RELATING TO THE ARTS, EDUCATION, ANIMAL WELFARE, PHYSICAL FITNESS AND CHILDREN.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$175kHousing & Shelter$118kHealth$69kReligion$40kAnimals$32kYouth Development$25kEducation$22kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIABETES YOUTH FOUNDATION OF INDIANA$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER AREA$20,000
SS PETER AND PAUL CATHEDRAL INDIANAPOLIS INC$15,000
GREEN CARES FOOD PANTRY$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREEN COUNTY$10,000
CHEMICAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
ASSOCIATION FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS WITH HANDICAPS INC (ARCH)$10,000
GREEN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
JDRF INTERNATIONAL$2,000
TUACAHN CENTER FOR THE ARTS$1,000
SIGNATURE PRODUCTIONS$1,000
LITERACY COUNCIL OF GREEN COUNTY LTD$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
MA
NV
IN
CA
UT
VA
MD

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 31% of It's Possible Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 77% of the giving stays in WI; read by stated purpose it is 46% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

It's Possible Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$293k · 12 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
26

Total granted

$293k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+54%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthAnimalsHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER AREA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $68k · revenue +12%
  • GC
    GREEN CARES FOOD PANTRY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +7%
  • GC
    Green County Humane Society
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • WA
    WISCONSIN ACADEMY FOR GRADUATE SERVICE DOGS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +44%
  • TT
    TOMAHAWK TOGETHER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CO
    CITY OF EVANSVILLE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rock River Repertory Theatre

Inspire artists, audiences, and our greater southern wisconsin community to celabrate the art of theatre.

Arts & Culture
2
Wabeno Area Players
Arts & Culture
3
Wisconsin Rapids Community Theatre Inc

Produce theater performances for community

Arts & Culture
4
Dane County Humane Society

Our mission is to foster compassionate human and animal connections; forge safe, healthy, and thriving communities for animals; provide care and transitional sheltering to animals; provide leadership and guidance to the animal sheltering…

Animals
5
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
6
Waukesia Civic Theatre Inc

Waukesha civic theatre provide quality live theatre performances and education that enrich, challenge and entertain both participants and audience members

Arts & Culture
7
Madison Public Theatre

Community theatre.

8
Underdog Pet Rescue of Wisconsin Inc

Underdog pet rescue is an all-breed companion animal rescue and vet clinic based out of dane county, wisconsin. our mission is to find permanent homes for animals in need and to enrich lives by strengthening the connection between animals…

Animals
9
Dodge County Humane Society Inc

Humane society providing animal stray service and animal care including adoptions, redemptions, and surrenders for residents located in dodge county, wi and surrounding areas.

Animals
10
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

11
Milwaukee Repertory Theater Inc

The organization ignites positive change in the cultural, social and economic vitality of its community by creating world-class theater experiences that entertain, provoke and inspire meaningful dialogue among an audience representative of…

Arts & Culture
12
Weidner Center Presents Inc

Weidner center presents, inc. primary purpose is to aid in providing educational, cultural and artistic programming for the weidner center for the performing arts which is located on the university of wisconsin - green bay campus

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cal Center Presents. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Food Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support OrganizationsVolunteer Fire DepartmentsFaith-Based Senior LivingCommunity Arts OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%4%<5yr12%13%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr16%29%35–55yr19%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%4%<5yr12%3%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr16%44%35–55yr19%8%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
8%
3,022/36,500

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER AREA INC — $68,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER AREA INCSS PETER AND PAUL CATHEDRAL INDIANAPOLIS INC — $39,000 · OtherSS PETER AND PAUL CATHEDRAL INDIANAPOLIS INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CENTRAL WISCONSIN — $25,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CENTRAL WISCONSINChemical Educational Foundation — $20,000 · OtherChemical Educational FoundationWISCONSIN ACADEMY FOR GRADUATE SERVICE DOGS INC — $15,000 · OtherWISCONSIN ACADEMY FOR GRADUATE SERVICE DOGS INCASSOCIATION FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS WITH HANDICAPS INC (ARCH) — $10,000 · OtherCITY OF EVANSVILLE — $10,000 · OtherVERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $10,000 · Other+22 more — $43,092 · Other+22 moreMADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $174,286 · PhilanthropyMADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONDIABETES YOUTH FOUNDATION OF INDIANA — $50,000 · HealthDIABETES Y…BREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,000 · Health+2 more — $2,000 · HealthHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREEN COUNTY INC — $48,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT F…GREEN CARES FOOD PANTRY INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionGreen County Humane Society — $10,000 · AnimalsMADISON CAT PROJECT INC — $5,000 · AnimalsVEGAS ROOTS RESCUE — $1,000 · AnimalsTOMAHAWK TOGETHER INC — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$240,092Philanthropy$174,286Health$54,000Housing & Shelter$48,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Animals$16,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER AREA INC — $68,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetDIABETES YOUTH FOUNDATION OF INDIANA — $50,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREEN COUNTY INC — $48,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetChemical Educational Foundation — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGREEN CARES FOOD PANTRY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWISCONSIN ACADEMY FOR GRADUATE SERVICE DOGS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTOMAHAWK TOGETHER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetGreen County Humane Society — $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetVERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMADISON CAT PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTUACAHN CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSignature Productions — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRED ROCK SEARCH AND RESCUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVERONA AREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVEGAS ROOTS RESCUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetULMAN FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUN PRAIRIE CIVIC THEATRE CORP — $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBENEDICTINE LIFE FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Madison Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization It's Possible Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to It's Possible Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to It's Possible Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph