Skip to content

· Public charity

Israel Benevolence Fund Inc

Organization's Mission: Israel Benevolence Fund, Inc makes donations to qualifying organizations for charitable use: humanitarian aid and educational assistance to widows, orphans at-risk children, Holocaust Survivors and trafficked teens and adults.

$142k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$616kReligion$42kFood & Nutrition$38k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $129k
$16,800
Median grant
6
States reached
$64k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The House of Stephanas$36,675
PEF Israel Endowment Fund Inc$24,000
Harvest for Asher$24,000
King of Kings Ministry$16,800
Tikkun Internation Ministry$14,400
Hatikva Project$13,200
Church's Ministry Among Jewish People$9,600
Watch Therefore Ministry$8,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARVEST FOR ASHER: $34k → 16%Harvest for Asher: $24k → 16%Harvest for Asher: $19k → 16%Harvest for Asher: $19k → 16%Harvest for Asher: $16k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$597k · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$597k
$0

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOUSE OF STEPHANAS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $204k · revenue +86%
  • SO
    Spring of Hope Foundation Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $113k · revenue -57% · 27% of their budget
  • KO
    KING OF KINGS MINISTRY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $74k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    3/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE HOUSE OF STEPHANAS: $203,995 · InternationalTHE HOUSE OF STEPHANASHATIKVA PROJECT US INC: $61,200 · InternationalHATIKVA PROJECT US INCHands of Mercy International: $38,550 · InternationalHands of Mercy InternationalKING OF KINGS MINISTRY INC: $74,400 · OtherKING OF KINGS MINISTRY IN…TIKKUN INTERNATIONAL INC: $52,800 · OtherTIKKUN INTERNATIONAL INCCMJ MINISTRIES INC: $28,800 · OtherCMJ MINISTRIES INCSpring of Hope Foundation Inc: $113,150 · Human ServicesSpring of Hope Fou…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $99,400 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOW…Watch Therefore Ministries Inc: $24,500 · Religion
    International$303,745Other$156,000Human Services$113,150Philanthropy$99,400Religion$24,500

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOUSE OF STEPHANAS: $203,995 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetSpring of Hope Foundation Inc: $113,150 over 5y, 27% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $99,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHATIKVA PROJECT US INC: $61,200 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHands of Mercy International: $38,550 over 2y, 12% of budgetWatch Therefore Ministries Inc: $24,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE HOUSE OF STEPHANAS ↗
    • Who funds Spring of Hope Foundation Inc ↗
    • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
    • Who funds HATIKVA PROJECT US INC ↗
    • Who funds Hands of Mercy International ↗
    • Who funds Watch Therefore Ministries Inc ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Jewish Voice Ministries IntlAZ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Jewish Voice Ministries Intl · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Israel Benevolence Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Israel Benevolence Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Israel Benevolence’s filings →

      More from the funding graph