Skip to content

· Private foundation

Isnardi Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.6M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.0MHuman Services$2.5MHousing & Shelter$1.6MEducation$458kPublic Safety & Disaster$436kFood & Nutrition$271kArts & Culture$263kReligion$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $337k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.6M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Marjoree Mason Center$2,600,000
Individual grant recipient$230,000
Poverello House$200,000
Marjorie Mason Center$150,000
Community Medical Center$145,860
Hinds Lifecare$85,000
Valley Center for the Blind$81,516
Friends of the Fresno Fair$81,000
Sons Daughters of Italy$59,658
EPU Childrens Center$55,000
Open Gate Ministries$55,000
The Lighthouse Recovery Program$55,000
Kaweah Health$50,000
Resiliency Center$50,000
Madera County Food Bank$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Wayfinder Family Services: $7k → 10%Break the Barriers: $14k → 19%Break the Barriers: $12k → 19%Break the Barriers: $8k → 19%Evangel Home: $49k → 19%Evangel Home Inc: $49k → 19%Evangel Home Inc: $28k → 19%Evangel Home: $26k → 19%Evangel Home: $25k → 19%Angels of Grace: $40k → 19%Angels of Grace: $40k → 19%Angels of Grace: $20k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $600k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $600k → 19%Marjorie Mason Center: $100k → 19%Marjorie Mason Center: $100k → 19%Marjorie Mason Center: $100k → 19%Marjorie Mason Center: $100k → 19%Marjorie Mason Center: $75k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $50k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $2.6M → 19%Marjorie Mason Center: $150k → 19%Angels of Grace: $42k → 19%Angels of Grace: $30k → 19%Angels of Grace: $25k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $108k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $107k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $100k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $50k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 44 repeat orgs$779k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
11

Total granted

$12M
$404k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+62%

Still filing today

45%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCivil RightsFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4.5M · revenue +210%
  • PH
    Poverello House
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +294%
  • VC
    VALLEY CENTER FOR THE BLIND
    7× · 2017–2025 · $507k · revenue +287%

Funded once

  • VC
    Valley Childrens Hospital Foundat
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • VC
    Valley Childrens Hospital Foundatio
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • UF
    UCSF Fresno School of Medicine
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
2
Central Valley Foster Care Inc

Operation of a foster family care agency

Human Services
3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Fresno and Madera Counties

CASA of Fresno and Madera Counties is a 501(c)3 community based nonprofit organization whose mission is to recruit, train, and support citizen volunteers to advocate and speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in the…

Civil Rights
4
Family Services of Tulare County Inc

The mission of Family Services is to help children, adults, and families throughout Tulare County heal from violence and thrive in healthy relationships. Family Services will accomplish this mission through direct services, advocacy,…

Human Services
5
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
6
Ark Homes Foster Family Agency

Ark Homes Foster Family Agency is committed to creating a safe, supportive, and nurturing environment for children by matching each child's needs with an appropriate family-based placement and services that promote stability, healing, and…

Human Services
7
Foothill House of Hospitality Dba Hospitality House

The mission of Hospitality House is tobring homeless people in Nevada County into a circle of community caring thatoffers shelter, sustenance, medical care, advocacy, opportunity, dignity, and hopeas we assist them in transitioning from…

Housing & Shelter
8
Court Appointed Special Advocates (Casa) of Merced County

Advocate for foster care children in courts. Providing quality intervention and advocacy services for abused, abandoned, and neglected children.

Crime & Legal
9
Casa of Tulare County

To aid the superior court of tulare county in the operation of the court appointed special advocate program.

Civil Rights
10
Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families

Hands of Hope works to enhance the quality of life in the Yuba-Sutter area by: Providing core support services to the homeless; Reintegrating the homeless within our community; Engaging the community to respond to the challenge of…

Housing & Shelter
11
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
12
Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc

Hope Solutions provides permanent affordable housing coupled with well-executed support services to people who are homeless or at risk to become homeless in Contra Costa County. Support services are individualized for each person or family…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresno Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wayfinder Family Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $4,475,000 · Human ServicesMARJAREE MASON CENTER INCHinds Hospice: $364,618 · Human ServicesHinds HospiceANGELS OF GRACE INC: $197,000 · Human ServicesEVANGEL HOME INC: $176,081 · Human Services+2 more: $40,800 · Human ServicesCommunity Medical Center: $735,568 · OtherCommunity Medical CenterEPU Childrens Center: $461,612 · OtherEPU Childrens CenterValley Childrens Hospital Foundati: $400,000 · OtherValley Childrens Hospital FoundatiHANDSON CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $270,000 · OtherOPEN GATE MINISTRIES INC: $257,608 · OtherResiliency Center: $245,629 · OtherVISALIA RESCUE MISSION: $244,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $230,000 · OtherUCSF Medical Center: $200,000 · OtherFriends of Big Fresno Fair: $190,975 · Other+31 more: $1,864,480 · Other+31 morePoverello House: $1,129,510 · Housing & ShelterPoverello H…FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC: $185,000 · Housing & ShelterFRESNO RESC…VALLEY CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $506,701 · HealthVALLEY CE…COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $347,800 · HealthCOMMUNITY…The Light-House Recovery Program Inc: $157,500 · HealthThe Light…MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $95,000 · HealthMENTAL HE…CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $170,444 · Food & NutritionMadera County Food Bank: $98,000 · Food & NutritionCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $45,000 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $6,170 · Civil RightsHIDALGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $41,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$5,253,499Other$5,100,172Housing & Shelter$1,314,510Health$1,107,001Food & Nutrition$268,444Civil Rights$51,170Youth Development$41,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $4,475,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetPoverello House: $1,129,510 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetVALLEY CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $506,701 over 7y, 12% of budgetHinds Hospice: $364,618 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $347,800 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetHANDSON CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $270,000 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetOPEN GATE MINISTRIES INC: $257,608 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetVISALIA RESCUE MISSION: $244,300 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetANGELS OF GRACE INC: $197,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC: $185,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetEVANGEL HOME INC: $176,081 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $170,444 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Light-House Recovery Program Inc: $157,500 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetMadera County Food Bank: $98,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $95,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $45,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetBreak the Barriers Inc: $33,800 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCARE FRESNO INC: $24,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetBRISTOL HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA: $12,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $6,170 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Poverello House ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds Hinds Hospice ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HANDSON CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds OPEN GATE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds VISALIA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS OF GRACE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds EVANGEL HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds The Light-House Recovery Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds Madera County Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sieg & Doris Fischer FDN-AGY-MAINCA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sieg & Doris Fischer FDN-AGY-MAIN · The Fansler Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Rotary Club of Fresno Foundation · Leon S Peters Foundation · Briscoe Family Foundation · Central California Food Bank · Teichert Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Wayne H Towne Family Foundation · Valley Children's Hospital · Aetna Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Isnardi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Isnardi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Isnardi Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Isnardi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Isnardi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph