Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wayne H Towne Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$315k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$582kArts & Culture$513kEducation$163kAnimals$139kHousing & Shelter$122kHuman Services$107kYouth Development$77kFood & Nutrition$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$9,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fresno Philharmonic Association$100,000
Valley Public Television$50,000
Sierra Meadows Foundation Inc$35,000
Hillsdale College$20,000
Hinds Life Care$20,000
Valley Animal Center$20,000
The Cat House on the Kings$10,000
Marjoree Mason Center$9,000
Evangel Home$9,000
Girl Scouts of Central Calif South$9,000
Poverello House$9,000
Fresno Mission$9,000
Sierra College Foundation$8,000
Halo Cafe Inc - Pet Food Pantry$5,805
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $240k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Evangel Home: $9k → 19%Evangel Home: $8k → 19%Evangel Home: $8k → 19%Evangel Home: $7k → 19%Evangel Home: $7k → 19%Evangel Home: $5k → 19%Evangel Home: $5k → 19%Evangel Home: $5k → 19%Evangel Home: $4k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $9k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $8k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $7k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $7k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $5k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $5k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $5k → 19%Marjoree Mason Center: $4k → 19%Valley Teen Ranch: $15k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $15k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $15k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $15k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $15k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $15k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $15k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $14k → 19%Hinds Hospice: $14k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Wayne H Towne Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Wayne H Towne Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 14 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$1.5M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+395%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsHousing & ShelterEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    Valley Public Television Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $413k · revenue +9%
  • VA
    VALLEY ANIMAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $129k · revenue +18%
  • HH
    Hinds Hospice
    8× · 2017–2024 · $118k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • VT
    Valley Teen Ranchgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +395%
  • SR
    Scottish Rite Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Valley Humane SocietyInc

Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…

Animals
2
Valley Oak Spca

Society for the prevention of cruelty to animals.

Animals
3
Valley Residential Services

Valley Residential Services provides personalized support in safe, comfortable home environments for developmentally disabled individuals, residences for veterans with rehabilitation opportunities, and family assistance services.

Health
4
Family Services of Tulare County Inc

The mission of Family Services is to help children, adults, and families throughout Tulare County heal from violence and thrive in healthy relationships. Family Services will accomplish this mission through direct services, advocacy,…

Human Services
5
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
6
Pajaro Valley Shelter Services

Pajaro Valley Shelter Services provides families with a path toward self-sufficient futures through short-and longer-term housing and supportive services.

Human Services
7
Valle Del Sol Inc

Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.

Health
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
Silicon Valley Pet Project

Silicon valley pet project (svpp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to saving local at-risk shelter pets through rescue, community involvement and education.

Animals
10
Valley Restart Shelter Inc

Valley Restart Shelter's mission is to support families, seniors, widows, children, and veterans on their path to permanent housing, and lasting stability-empowering them with hope and a renewed sense of pride.

Housing & Shelter
11
Southern California Equine Foundation Inc

Providing equine veterinary hospital facilities and support services in the care of injured or sick race horses

Animals
12
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marjaree Mason Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Valley Public Television Inc — $413,098 · Arts & CultureValley Public Television IncThe Fresno Philharmonic Association — $100,000 · Arts & CultureThe Fresno Philharmonic Associati…Friends of the Fresno Scottish Rite — $369,000 · OtherFriends of the Fresno Scottish R…Girl Scouts of Central California South Inc — $61,599 · OtherGirl Scouts of Central Californi…Hinds Life Care — $20,000 · Other+4 more — $45,469 · Other+4 moreHinds Hospice — $118,000 · Human ServicesHinds HospiceEVANGEL HOME INC — $57,774 · Human ServicesEVANGEL HOME IN…MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC — $49,333 · Human ServicesMARJAREE MASON …Valley Teen Ranch — $15,000 · Human ServicesValley Teen Ran…VALLEY ANIMAL CENTER — $129,064 · AnimalsVALLEY AN…THE CAT HOUSE ON THE KINGS INC — $10,000 · AnimalsTHE CAT H…HILLSDALE COLLEGE — $80,000 · EducationHILLSDALE…Sierra College Foundation — $58,000 · EducationSierra Co…Poverello House — $67,661 · Housing & ShelterFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC — $54,500 · Housing & ShelterSIERRA MEADOWS FOUNDATION — $75,000 · HealthCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation — $4,239 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$513,098Other$496,068Human Services$240,107Animals$139,064Education$138,000Housing & Shelter$122,161Health$75,000Philanthropy$4,239

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetValley Public Television Inc — $413,098 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetVALLEY ANIMAL CENTER — $129,064 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetHinds Hospice — $118,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Fresno Philharmonic Association — $100,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPoverello House — $67,661 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGirl Scouts of Central California South Inc — $61,599 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSierra College Foundation — $58,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetEVANGEL HOME INC — $57,774 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC — $54,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC — $49,333 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetValley Teen Ranch — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation — $4,239 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Valley Public Television Inc
  • Who funds VALLEY ANIMAL CENTER
  • Who funds Hinds Hospice
  • Who funds The Fresno Philharmonic Association
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds SIERRA MEADOWS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Poverello House
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Central California South Inc
  • Who funds Sierra College Foundation
  • Who funds EVANGEL HOME INC
  • Who funds FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC
  • Who funds Valley Teen Ranch
  • Who funds THE CAT HOUSE ON THE KINGS INC
  • Who funds Central Valley Community Foundation A Corporation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leon S Peters FoundationCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leon S Peters Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Isnardi Foundation · Valley Children's Hospital · The Edward M and Jeanne C Kashian Family Foundation Inc · Briscoe Family Foundation · Educational Employees Credit Union · United Way California Capital Region · Teichert Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Carmax Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wayne H Towne Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wayne H Towne Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wayne H Towne Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph