Skip to content

· Private foundation

Isen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$91kReligion$45kCivil Rights$34kInternational$22kHealth$10kHuman Services$550
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
$1,430
Median grant
1
States reached
$10
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SWC MUSEUM$39,000
CHABAD OF CALABASAS$2,500
CHABAD OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE$1,430
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$1,000
BABA SALE CONGREGATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NYDM FDT: $100 → 10%EM HABANIM SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION: $228 → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA: $180 → 17%B FOUNDATION: $100 → 10%EN HABANIM SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION: $72 → 14%EN HABANIM SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION: $72 → 14%CHABAD OF CALABASAS: $3k → 14%MUSIC CENTER: $800 → 14%THE MUSIC CENTER: $200 → 14%SWC MUSEUM: $50k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $185 → 14%SWC MUSEUM: $39k → 14%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC: $182 → 14%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $24k → 14%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $129 → 14%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $10k → 14%CHABAD OF BRENTWOOD: $1k → 14%CHABAD OF BRENTWOOD: $700 → 14%CHABAD OF BRENTWOOD: $700 → 14%CHABAD OF BRENTWOOD: $700 → 14%CHABAD OF BRENTWOOD: $500 → 14%LIVING TORAH CENTER CHABAD: $661 → 14%LIVING TORAH CENTER: $590 → 14%LIVING TORAH CENTER: $250 → 14%LIVING TORAH CENTER: $250 → 14%LIVING TORAH CENTER: $180 → 14%LIVING TORAH CENTER: $100 → 14%LIVING TORAH CENTER: $72 → 14%PBS SOCIAL: $29 → 14%CHABAD TELETHON: $10k → 14%CHABAD OF THE CONEJO: $185 → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $5k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $100 → 14%TRIBE MEDIA CORP: $69 → 14%LASHA: $550 → 14%SEPHARDIC EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $36k → 14%SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%FRIEND OF THE IDF: $4k → 14%BABA SALE CONGREGATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 6 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
15

Total granted

$96k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+53%

Still filing today

33%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22
Arts & CultureHealthReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SWC MUSEUM CORP
    2× · 2017–2022 · $89k · revenue +25%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF BRENTWOOD INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k
  • LT
    LIVING TORAH CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k

Funded once

  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SEPHARDIC EDUCATIONAL & CULTURAL CENTER IN JERUSALEMgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue +115%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $34k · revenue +51%
  • SJ
    SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
6
The Jerusalem Connection
—
7
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
8
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
9
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
10
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
11
National Center for Jewish Filminc

The national center for jewish film is a unique, independent nonprofit motion picture archive, distributor, resource center and exhibitor. ncjf's ongoing mission is the collection, preservation and exhibition of films with artistic and…

Arts & Culture
12
Yivo Institute for Jewish Research Inc

Yivo's mission is to study the thousand-year history of jewish life in eastern europe and russia in all its aspects: language, history, religion, folkways and material culture. yivo's archive and library preserves a significant collection…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SWC MUSEUM CORP: $89,000 · Arts & CultureSWC MUSEUM CORPSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $34,400 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC+2 more: $496 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL SEPHARDIC EDUCATIONAL & CULTURAL CENTER IN JERUSALEM: $36,000 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL SEPHAR…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant…CITY OF HOPE: $5,100 · OtherCITY OF HOPECHABAD OF BRENTWOOD INC: $4,000 · OtherCHABAD OF BRENTW…CHABAD OF CALABASAS: $2,500 · OtherCHABAD OF CALABA…LIVING TORAH CENTER: $1,442 · OtherCHABAD OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE: $1,430 · OtherBABA SALE CONGREGATION: $1,000 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherMUSIC CENTER: $1,000 · Other+8 more: $2,146 · Other+8 moreSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $3,600 · International
Arts & Culture$123,896Religion$36,000Other$29,618Health$10,100International$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSWC MUSEUM CORP: $89,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SEPHARDIC EDUCATIONAL & CULTURAL CENTER IN JERUSALEM: $36,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $34,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $314 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIBE MEDIA CORP: $69 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SWC MUSEUM CORP ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SEPHARDIC EDUCATIONAL & CULTURAL CENTER IN JERUSALEM ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRIBE MEDIA CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Isen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Isen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Isen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Isen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Isen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph