Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Iseli Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$394k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$274k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$595kInternational$73kEducation$48kYouth Development$24kAnimals$20kHuman Services$11kHealth$6kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
  • $250k+1 grant · $274k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING WATER$274,000
GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES$20,000
GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GRESHAM$20,000
CHAMPION MINISTRIES$20,000
GRACE CHAPEL CASTLE ROCK$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $20k → 14%HEARTLAND INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $10k → 5%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 8%HEARTLAND INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $10k → 5%BIRCH COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
OR
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
AZ
KS
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$647k · 31 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
14

Total granted

$647k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+31%

Still filing today

32%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +36%
  • MH
    MT HOOD HOSPICE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +19%
  • CU
    COLORADO UPLIFT INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • TD
    THE DENVER STREET SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • WI
    WONDERWORK INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
2
Great Commission University Inc

Gcu serves the global church by educating mission leaders to fulfill the great commission of jesus christ. gcu accomplishes this mission through a comprehensive program of biblical and general education, christ-centered service and…

Education
3
Pacific Theological Seminary

To deliver biblically-based education and ministry mentoring through graduate-level degree programs.

Education
4
Pacific School of Religion

Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…

Education
5
Teleo University

To provide affordable, accessible, accredited education to pastors and leaders to finish the great commission by multiplying disciple makers.

Education
6
University of Northwestern - St Paul

See schedule o. founded in 1902, university of northwestern - st. paul is a nondenominational christian university that integrates the educational philosophy of "faith, learning and living" through two focuses: higher education and media.…

Education
7
Columbia International University

Ciu educates from a biblical worldview to impact the nations with the message of christ.

Education
8
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

9
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
10
Phoenix Seminary Inc

Phoenix seminary's mission is to train men and women for christ-centered ministry for the building of healthy churches in phoenix and the world.

Education
11
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
12
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Berean Way Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Hospice Care ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr19%21%20–35yr12%21%35–55yr16%47%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr19%16%20–35yr12%15%35–55yr16%60%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 6% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
2/36
the rest of the field
11%
2,771/25,395

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIVING WATER — $357,500 · OtherLIVING WATERFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GRESHAM — $70,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GRESHAMWESTERN SEMINARY — $59,000 · OtherWESTERN SEMINARYAMERICAN BAPTIST FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY — $28,000 · Other+29 more — $129,100 · Other+29 moreInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America — $20,000 · Human ServicesHeartland International Ministries — $20,000 · Human ServicesGood Samaritan Ministries — $20,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $13,000 · EducationWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · EducationCOLORADO UPLIFT INC — $4,000 · EducationBARCLAY COLLEGE — $4,000 · EducationMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC — $4,000 · EducationLinfield University — $3,000 · EducationCHAMPION MINISTRIES INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBEREAN WAY INC — $6,000 · ReligionEternal Perspective Ministries — $4,000 · ReligionKOLO GROUP — $3,000 · ReligionAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $500 · ReligionMy Sisters House — $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$643,600Human Services$61,000Education$41,000Youth Development$20,000Religion$13,500Crime & Legal$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHeartland International Ministries — $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEREAN WAY INC — $6,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMT HOOD HOSPICE — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DENVER STREET SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARCLAY COLLEGE — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEternal Perspective Ministries — $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMy Sisters House — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBirch Community Services Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON RIGHT TO LIFE — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America
  • Who funds CHAMPION MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds Heartland International Ministries
  • Who funds Good Samaritan Ministries
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BEREAN WAY INC
  • Who funds WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MT HOOD HOSPICE
  • Who funds THE DENVER STREET SCHOOL
  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC
  • Who funds BARCLAY COLLEGE
  • Who funds MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Eternal Perspective Ministries
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC
  • Who funds KOLO GROUP
  • Who funds Linfield University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

M J Murdock Charitable TrustWA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Iseli Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States Dept100% of income from government
  • Warner Pacific University14% of income from government
  • Linfield University4% of income from government
  • Corban University3% of income from government
  • George Fox University2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph