· Private foundation
Isaly Dairy Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HERO TO A CHILD | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| WUSF PUBLIC MEDIA | $3,000 |
| DMG SCHOOL PROJECT | $2,000 |
| HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVAN | $2,000 |
| DUNEDIN FINE ART CENTER | $2,000 |
| SAFETY HARBOR ART AND MUSIC | $1,500 |
| POLK COUNTY BULLY PROJECT | $1,500 |
| ECOSPHERE RESTORATION INSTITUTE | $1,500 |
| ARKANSAS PAWS IN PRISON | $1,500 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF TAMPA BAY | $1,500 |
| SHADY SIDE ACADEMY | $1,500 |
| TRUE AND FAITHFUL PET RESCUE | $1,500 |
| TURTLE MOUNTAIN ANIMAL RESCUE | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DFDunedin Fine Art Center9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +6%
- PCPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC6× · 2019–2024 · $14k · revenue +43%
Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +156%
Funded once
- GMGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $1k
- FSFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +6%
- DVDUBOIS VOLUNTEERS INCone grant, 2017 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate the public and promote understanding, enjoyment, and scholarly examination of art through the exhibition of works by salvador dali and artists of similar vision to preserve and expand its collection of art of dali and related…
Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
To provide educational displays and information on art in our area and to provide scholarships.
The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.
The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…
As an arts leader in florida, the ashley gibson barnett museum of art at florida southern college inc (the agb) educates and inspires the community through creative and diverse exhibitions and the acquisition and care of a permanent…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The st petersburg area chamber of commerce shall be the preeminent leader of business in order to ensure the economic growth and vitality for all in our community.
The Florida Aquarium's mission focuses on our Shared Purpose of a commitment to save marine wildlife, with a Vision to be Florida's leading conservation-based Aquarium. It accomplishes this mission through hosting over 1 million visitors…
Spca florida exists to eliminate animal suffering and to engage the entire community in the welfare and well-being of animals.we accomplish this by advancing model programs to promote the adoption of healthy animals, prevent dog and cat…
To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Sheriffs Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is James Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dunedin Fine Art Center ↗
- Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds Hero To A Child Inc ↗
- Who funds SHADY SIDE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SHORECREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ECOSPHERE RESTORATION INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Animalluvr's Dream Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds ST PETERSBURG ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds WINTER PARK LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds POLK COUNTY BULLY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAFETY HARBOR ART AND MUSIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds DMG SCHOOL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PINELLAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TURTLE MOUNTAIN ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds THE LEEPA-RATTNER MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS PAWS IN PRISON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds DUBOIS VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
- Who funds JAMIE'S DREAM TEAM ↗
- Who funds James Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds CARROLLWOOD DAY SCHOOL EDUCATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · White Family Foundation · Dwayne Hawkins Family Foundation Inc D/B/A Crown Automotive Charities · Foundation for a Healthy St Petersburg Inc · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Isaly Dairy Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ecosphere Restoration Institute Inc — 82% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Community Action Stops Abuse Inc — 13% of income from government
- Florida Sheriffs Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.