Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$385k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$865kHuman Services$393kEducation$247kYouth Development$240kPublic Benefit$55kHousing & Shelter$35kArts & Culture$30kPhilanthropy$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT$50,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$50,000
HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$50,000
SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME$50,000
REACH OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$35,000
INTER FAITH SERVICE COALITION$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
BROOKE'S HOUSE$25,000
COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC$25,000
GIRLS INC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$20,000
HAGERSTOWN AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL$10,000
COLLEGIUM SANCTORUM ANGELORUM$10,000
LADDERS TO LEADERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $620k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50k → 14%HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $100k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50k → 14%HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $50k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50k → 14%HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $50k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25k → 14%HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $50k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25k → 14%HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $50k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25k → 14%HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $50k → 12%LADDERS TO LEADERS: $5k → 12%THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $40k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 13 repeat orgs$366k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$1.9M
$286k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+45%

Still filing today

69%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $250k · revenue +99%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $225k · revenue +53%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $140k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASH CO MD
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • US
    UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • AO
    ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Washington County Inc

To work together with our interdisciplinary team to provide quality, coordinated, comprehensive patient and family-centered care that addresses the physical, spiritual, emotional and practical needs of our patients. we encourage our…

—
2
Joseph Richey House Inc

The joseph richey house inc. provided hospice home care and palliative care for terminally ill adults and children. the joseph richey house was closed in december 2021. services are now provided by gilchrist center baltimore.

—
3
Woodley House Inc

Woodley house enables district of columbia residents with mental health disorders to live full and healthy lives with dignity by providing supportive housing and services.

Health
4
Upper Chesapeake Residential Hospice House Inc

Ucrhh, also known as senator bob hooper house, is an assisted living facility specializing in hospice care, offering a homelike setting for those who are unable to have their needs met at home. our mission is for all families in our…

Human Services
5
Lake Whatcom Residential and Treatment Center

Our mission is to empower chronically mentally ill adults in our community to achieve and maintain the highest possible level of independence. we accomplish this by providing compassionate, comprehensive services - including outpatient…

Health
6
Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc

Gilchrist hospice care is organized and operated excludively as a nonprofit charitable and educational organization within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code for the following purposes: (1) to develop, own,…

—
7
Anchor Homes Inc

Anchor homes operates a faith-based recovery program and believes in helping people of all races, nationality, social class, religion, gender, and language with recovery programming and housing. we believe that the answer to addiction is…

Health
8
Hch Real Estate Company Inc

Develops affordable and supportive multifamily rental housing in baltimore. our projects are designed to be community-centered, environmentally sustainable and deeply affordable.

Housing & Shelter
9
Resurrection Power of Washington Pa

Resurrection power provides faith-based addiction recovery houses. pastoral care is provided to help build residents' spiritual recovery.

Health
10
Hospice Care Corporation D/B/a West Virginia Caring

To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.

—
11
Sacred Heart Home

44-Bed licensed nursing home in Hyattsville, Maryland that provides nursing care services to its residents

Health
12
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Free Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Collegium Sanctorum Angelorum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $280,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASH CO MD: $100,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASH CO MDTHE SALVATION ARMY: $85,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $67,500 · OtherSAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INCWASHINGTON COUNTY COUNCIL OF: $55,000 · OtherWASHINGTON COUNTY COUNCIL OFUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MD FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MD FOUNDATIONRELIGIOUS EFFORT TO ASSIST AND CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC (REACH): $35,000 · OtherINTERFAITH SERVICE COALITION OF HANCOCK MARYLAND INC: $30,000 · OtherJOINT VETERANS COUNCIL OF WASH CO: $30,000 · Other+4 more: $61,000 · Other+4 moreHOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $350,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY I…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $225,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RE…COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC: $115,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC…BROOKES HOUSE INC: $65,000 · HealthBROOKES HOUSE INCUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $102,000 · EducationCOLLEGIUM SANCTORUM ANGELORUM: $70,000 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $140,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyGATEKEEPERS CORPORATION: $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$868,500Human Services$620,000Health$430,000Education$172,000Youth Development$140,000Philanthropy$25,000Crime & Legal$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $350,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $225,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $140,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC: $115,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $102,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGIUM SANCTORUM ANGELORUM: $70,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetSAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $67,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBROOKES HOUSE INC: $65,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRELIGIOUS EFFORT TO ASSIST AND CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC (REACH): $35,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetINTERFAITH SERVICE COALITION OF HANCOCK MARYLAND INC: $30,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGATEKEEPERS CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLADDERS TO LEADERS LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIUM SANCTORUM ANGELORUM ↗
  • Who funds SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKES HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds RELIGIOUS EFFORT TO ASSIST AND CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC (REACH) ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH SERVICE COALITION OF HANCOCK MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEKEEPERS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LADDERS TO LEADERS LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland IncMD28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland Inc · Alice V & David W Fletcher Foundation Inc · The Hamilton Family Foundation Inc · Richard N Funkhouser Foundationinc · Holzapfel Family Charitable Foundation C/O James Holzapfel · Pauline K Anderson Foundation Inc · The Jone L Bowman Foundation Inc · United Way of Washington County Maryland Inc · The John R Hershey and Anna L Hershey Family Foundation Inc · Nora Roberts Foundation · Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation · W Lee & Rosalie Ridenour Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • San Mar Children's Home Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Gatekeepers Corporation: 13% of income from government
  • Interfaith Service Coalition of Hancock Maryland Inc: 5% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated?

Find your warmest path to Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irving M Einbinder’s filings →

More from the funding graph