Skip to content
Irving Joseph Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Irving Joseph Charitable Trust

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$81kHuman Services$65kReligion$36kArts & Culture$35kPhilanthropy$20kEducation$10kAnimals$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STRAZ PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$25,000
JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HANDS ACROSS THE BAY: $36k → 12%JULIE WEINTRAUBS HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC: $5k → 12%JULIE WEINTRAUBS HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC: $3k → 12%WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$143k · 6 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +156% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
24

Total granted

$143k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+156%
+54%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JW
    JULIE WEINTRAUB'S HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $43k · revenue +56%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $43k · revenue +898%
  • TJ
    TAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $23k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -81%
  • TC
    THE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +67%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
2
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

—
3
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
4
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
5
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
8
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
9
The Family Healthcare Foundation Inc

The family healthcare foundation's mission is to be the trusted leader in our community, ensuring access to high-quality healthcare for all in the tampa bay area. see also schedule o.

Health
10
The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.

Human Services
11
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
12
Hospice of the Florida Keys Inc

To enable individuals to remain in their homes by supporting compassionate, effective, life-enhancing health and supportive services. at this time, hfk care corporation is inactive.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is For the Love of Poodles and Pooches Rescue of Richmond Virginia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STRAZ PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $25,000 · OtherSTRAZ PERFORMING ARTS CENTERCONGREGATION RODEPH SHOLOM: $15,959 · OtherCONGREGATION RODEPH SHOLOMCHILDREN'S HOME NETWORK: $11,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOME NETWORKHOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $10,000 · OtherHOLOCAUST MUSEUMJESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherJESUIT HIGH SCHOOLCONGREGATION RODEPH SHOLOM: $7,880 · OtherCONGREGATION RODEPH SHOLOMYOUNG ISRAEL OF TAMPA INC: $5,000 · OtherForty Carrots of Sarasota Inc: $5,000 · OtherMOFFITT CANCER CENTER: $5,000 · Other+9 more: $20,157 · Other+9 moreST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC: $42,896 · HealthST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FO…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $15,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCTHE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY I…+5 more: $8,942 · Health+5 moreJULIE WEINTRAUB'S HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC: $43,397 · Human ServicesJULIE WEINTRAUB'S H…Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC: $22,650 · Recreation & SportsTAMPA JCC…Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $6,900 · AnimalsFor the Love of Poodles and Pooches Rescue of Richmond Virginia: $490 · AnimalsFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $500 · Youth Development
Other$114,996Health$76,838Human Services$45,397Recreation & Sports$22,650Animals$7,390Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJULIE WEINTRAUB'S HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC: $43,397 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC: $42,896 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC: $22,650 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $6,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetForty Carrots of Sarasota Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTARTING RIGHT NOW: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRYAN CALLAHAN FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEASTER SEALS FLORIDA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWheelchairs 4 Kids Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $1,192 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORE HEALTH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFor the Love of Poodles and Pooches Rescue of Richmond Virginia: $490 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vinik Family Foundati…Debartolo Family Foun…Community Foundation …The Donna Joseph Char…Estell Alexander Char…United Way Suncoast I…Enterprise Holdings F…Raymond James Charita…Sophie and Andrew Hla…John and Paulette Pag…New York Yankees Tamp…The Spurlino Foundati…
Vinik Family FoundationFL17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vinik Family Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · The Donna Joseph Charitable Trust · Estell Alexander Charitable Trust · United Way Suncoast Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Sophie and Andrew Hlavach Charitable Trust · John and Paulette Paganelli Charitable Tr · New York Yankees Tampa Foundation Inc · The Spurlino Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving Joseph Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving Joseph Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Tampa Jccfederation Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Irving Joseph Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Irving Joseph Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irving Joseph’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home