Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving & Marilyn Naiditch Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$571k
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$986kArts & Culture$398kHuman Services$256kEmployment$143kInternational$138kCivil Rights$100kPhilanthropy$83kHealth$72kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $483k
$1,500
Median grant
17
States reached
$873k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM EDUCATION$150,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB$130,000
LLS CENTRAL ILLINOIS$102,500
BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM$100,000
TOTAL LINK TO COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA$10,000
FOLK ARTS RAJASTHAN$7,500
PULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$5,000
CANINE THERAPY CORPS$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$3,500
TRUAH$3,000
WHYY$2,500
POPULATION MEDIA CENTER$2,500
CAMP COURAGEOUS$2,500
POPULATION CONNECTION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $144k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $250 → 6%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $3k → 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $250 → 6%CHILDREN'S PLACE: $5k → 14%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $500 → 14%CHILDREN'S PLACE: $5k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $250 → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $250 → 14%TOTALLINK2COMMUNITY: $20k → 14%TOTAL LINK TO COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE: $20k → 14%TOTAL LINK TO COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE: $20k → 14%TOTAL LINK TO COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE: $20k → 14%TOTAL LINK TO COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE: $20k → 14%TOTALLINK2COMMUNITY: $10k → 14%TOTALLINK2COMMUNITY: $10k → 14%TOTALLINK2COMMUNITY: $8k → 14%TOTALLINK2COMMUNITY: $2k → 14%JOURNEYSTHE ROAD HOME: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 84 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

84 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
81

Total granted

$2.2M
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+26%

Still filing today

49%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TOTALLINK TO COMMUNITY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $130k · revenue +106%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $78k · revenue +77%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $75k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • MM
    MOTE MARINE LAB AQUARIUM
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • JC
    JCC CHICAGOAPACHE PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • BT
    BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
2
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
3
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
4
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
10
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
11
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Highland Park Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 187 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/84
Grantees still filing
53/84
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $488,700 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM: $400,000 · OtherBOYS TOWN JERUSALEMILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM EDUCATION: $350,000 · OtherILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM EDUCATIONLLS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $202,500 · OtherLLS CENTRAL ILLINOIS+139 more: $559,468 · Other+139 moreTOTALLINK TO COMMUNITY INC: $130,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S PLACE ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $5,000 · Human Services+5 more: $4,100 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA INC: $78,200 · EducationPOPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC: $11,500 · EducationChildren First Inc: $10,500 · Education+2 more: $600 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $74,910 · Civil RightsTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyFOLK ARTS RAJASTHAN INC: $16,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $7,500 · PhilanthropyMSI US: $4,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $750 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $11,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $9,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,500 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $7,500 · InternationalT'RUAH: $5,250 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND: $4,500 · InternationalTHE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES INC: $3,600 · International+7 more: $6,750 · InternationalBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,000 · HealthPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthCANINE THERAPY CORPS INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP: $1,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC: $1,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · Health+3 more: $750 · Health
Other$2,000,668Human Services$149,100Education$100,800Civil Rights$74,910Philanthropy$63,750International$56,600Health$21,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOTALLINK TO COMMUNITY INC: $130,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA INC: $78,200 over 7y, 17% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $74,910 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOLK ARTS RAJASTHAN INC: $16,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetCURT'S CAFE: $13,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPOPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC: $11,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren First Inc: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S PLACE ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $6,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetT'RUAH: $5,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE INC CO ELISE LARSEN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInstitute for Nonviolence Chicago: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $4,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $4,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMSI US: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAccountability Journalism Institute Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetWHYY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOMWAHAT AL-SALAM INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOTALLINK TO COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOLK ARTS RAJASTHAN INC ↗
  • Who funds CURT'S CAFE ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Children First Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S PLACE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Circle of Service FoundationIL23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Circle of Service Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · First Bank Chicago Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Caryl H and Bernard M Susman Family Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Roslyn & Joseph Perlman Foundation · North Shore Exchange Nfp · Highland Park Community Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving & Marilyn Naiditch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving & Marilyn Naiditch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Children First Inc: 100% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Saint Leo University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Irving & Marilyn Naiditch Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Irving & Marilyn Naiditch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 187 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irving & Marilyn Naiditch Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph