Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving & Francine Suknow Foundation Co-Trustees Henry Fader & Lynda Gordon

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$813k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$460k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$4.8MEducation$363kPhilanthropy$121kHuman Services$82kInternational$52kScience & Tech$50kReligion$34k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $265k
  • $250k+1 grant · $460k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION MOORES CANCER CENTER$460,000
UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$100,000
RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$65,000
HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO$25,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO$20,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY$15,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$10,000
THE V FOUNDATION$5,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$4,500
PADRES PEDAL THE CAUSE$3,500
SEACREST FOUNDATION$2,500
PHASE ONE FOUNDATION - ROAD TO CURING CANCER$1,000
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $20k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 17 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$5.4M
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+43%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +78%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +374%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $39k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • CS
    CATHOLIC SECONDARY EDUCATION- DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • CD
    Casa De Amparograduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
4
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
5
Jfs Foundation

To support the charitable mission of jewish community foundation of san diego, a ca nonprofit public benefit corporation, by facilitating charitable activities of the type carried on by jewish family service of san diego, a ca nonprofit…

Human Services
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
7
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
8
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
9
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
10
Rady Jewish Family Service Foundation

The specific purpose of this corporation is to support the charitable mission, purposes, and activities of jewish family service of san diego.

Philanthropy
11
Hebrew Free Loan of San Diego

Hebrew free loan of san diego fosters financial stability and opportunity among the jewish community of san diego county by providing access to affordable interest free loans with jewish values of compassion, kindness, and flexibility.…

—
12
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of San Diego; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UCSD FOUNDATION MOORES CANCER CENTER: $2,156,000 · OtherUCSD FOUNDATION MOORES CANCER CENTERNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $497,000 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $300,000 · OtherRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITALJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $120,000 · Other+6 more: $146,800 · OtherUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $1,605,500 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $492,500 · PhilanthropyRADY CHILD…+2 more: $14,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $65,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $38,500 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $13,500 · InternationalCUREBOUND: $18,500 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $17,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · Health
Other$3,219,800Education$1,605,500Philanthropy$507,000Human Services$66,000International$52,000Health$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $1,605,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $492,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $120,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $65,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $38,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO: $34,300 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCUREBOUND: $18,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEACREST FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInterfaith Community Services Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSharp Healthcare Foundation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCasa De Amparo: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SEACREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sharp Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds Casa De Amparo ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Leichtag Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving & Francine Suknow Foundation Co-Trustees Henry Fader & Lynda Gordon funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving & Francine Suknow Foundation Co-Trustees Henry Fader & Lynda Gordon. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Irving & Francine Suknow Foundation Co-Trustees Henry Fader & Lynda Gordon?

    Find your warmest path to Irving & Francine Suknow Foundation Co-Trustees Henry Fader & Lynda Gordon through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Irving & Francine Suknow Foundation Co-Trustees Henry Fader & Lynda Gordon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph