Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving and Anne Rothstein Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$99kEducation$42kInternational$1kHuman Services$1kHealth$500
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHLAYIM$8,980
BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON$4,000
KHAL KESSER YISROEL MORDECHAI$1,700
Individual grant recipient$1,350
Individual grant recipient$1,200
YESHIVA TORAH VODAATH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HASHLEIMUS$1,000
KOLLEL OF GREATER BOSTON$750
CONGREGATION BAIS AVROHOM$750
ROFEH INTERNATIONAL$500
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON: $5k → 16%LEV HATORAH: $1k → 9%RABBI JACOB JOSEPH SCHOOL: $2k → 11%YESHIVA SHAAREI ZION: $1k → 13%KEREN OHR HATORAH: $1k → 14%KEHELA KDOSHA: $1k → 17%KHAL KESSER YISROEL MORDECHAI: $2k → 20%MESIVTA RABBI JACOB JOSEPH: $2k → 8%BETH MEDNASH GOVOHA: $2k → 11%EZEN YISRAEL: $1k → 12%BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON: $4k → 16%CONGREGATION KASSER YISROEL MORDECHA: $2k → 20%RABBI JACOB JOSEPH YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 8%YESHIVA EVEN YISROEL: $1k → 11%BAIS-YAAKOV OF BOSTON HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $4k → 16%CONGREGATION KHAL KESER YISROEL MORDECHAI: $2k → 20%RABBI JACOB JOSEPH YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 8%YESHIVA EVEN YISROEL: $1k → 11%BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $3k → 16%KOLLEL MENACHEM YISROEL: $1k → 20%YESHIVA EVEN YISROEL: $1k → 11%BAIS-YAAKOV OF BOSTON HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $3k → 16%KOLLEL MENACHEM YISROEL: $1k → 20%EVEN YISRAEL: $1k → 11%BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $2k → 16%KOLLEL MENACHIM YISROEL: $1k → 20%BAIS-YAAKOV OF BOSTON HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $2k → 16%CONGREGATION KESSER YISROEL MORDECHAI: $1k → 20%KOLLEL OF GREATER BOSTON: $1k → 16%CONGREGATION KHAL KESER YISROEL MORDECHAI: $1k → 20%KOLLEL OF GREATER BOSTON: $1k → 16%BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HASHLEMOUS: $1k → 16%MESIVTA OF GREATER BOSTON HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HASHLEMOUS: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HASHLEIMUS: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HASHLEMOUS: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HASHLEMOUS: $1k → 16%YESHIVA TORAH VODAATH: $2k → 20%MESIVTA OF GREATER BOSTON HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 16%MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHLAYIM: $10k → 20%MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHLAYIM: $9k → 20%MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHLAYIM: $6k → 20%MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHLAYIM: $6k → 20%MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHLAYIM: $6k → 20%MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHALAYIM: $6k → 20%MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHLAYIM: $4k → 20%MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHLAYIM: $4k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$118k · 18 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
30

Total granted

$118k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+64%

Still filing today

28%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BY
    BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +97%
  • KO
    KOLLEL OF GREATER BOSTON INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +37%
  • LB
    LEV BEREL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $600 · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CK
    CONGREGATION KASSER YISROEL MORDECHA
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • MR
    MESIVTA RABBI JACOB JOSEPH
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
5
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
7
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
8
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
9
Beitar Community Kollel Inc
Philanthropy
10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
Kollel Ohr Hatorah Inc

To expand torah education

Religion
12
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chofetz Chaim Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Rofeh Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHALAYIM: $50,960 · OtherMOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHALAYIMYAD L'ACHIM: $6,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HASHLEIMUS INC: $5,000 · OtherKOLLEL OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $4,240 · OtherYESHIVATH TORAH VODAATH: $4,000 · Other+41 more: $48,925 · Other+41 moreBAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON INC: $22,500 · EducationBAIS YAAKOV OF BOS…+1 more: $360 · EducationLEV BEREL INC: $600 · ReligionOhr Hatorah: $500 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $360 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM OF LAKEWOOD: $360 · Religion
Other$119,125Education$22,860Religion$1,820

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON INC: $22,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HASHLEIMUS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetKOLLEL OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $4,240 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetROFEH INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOhr Hatorah: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCRANTON HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM OF LAKEWOOD: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HASHLEIMUS INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH INC ↗
  • Who funds LEV BEREL INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohr Hatorah ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY20.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Rosalyn and Richard Slifka Charitable Trust · Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · Joseph and Rae Gann Charitable Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving and Anne Rothstein Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving and Anne Rothstein Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Bais Yaakov of Boston Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Kollel of Greater Boston Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irving and Anne Rothstein Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph