Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Iron Horse Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$700k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Youth Development$1.2MHealth$790kEducation$655kHuman Services$489kPhilanthropy$361kRecreation & Sports$291kArts & Culture$196kEnvironment$139kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $236k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$22,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS$300,000
INTEGRATE HEALTH$50,000
ARTFACTORY$50,000
YAMPA VALLEY AUTISM PROGRAM$50,000
LAKELAND VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$35,003
PARTNERS FOR YOUTH$35,000
YAMPATIKA$30,000
TREAD OF PIONERS MUSEUM$25,000
GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE$22,000
CENTRAL FLORIDA SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER$17,599
ROUTT COUNTY UNITED WAY$16,000
PATHWAYS TOGO$15,000
STEAMBOAT MONTESSORI$15,000
BECAUSE I SAID I WOULD$15,000
ACHIEVEMENT ACADEMY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YAMPA VALLEY AUTISM PROGRAM: $50k → 7%YAMPA VALLEY AUTISM PROGRAM: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MA
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.3M · 27 repeat orgs$400k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
10

Total granted

$4.3M
$276k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+13%

Still filing today

59%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentEducationHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $965k · revenue +51%
  • YV
    Yampa Valley Autism Program
    6× · 2019–2024 · $295k · revenue +75%
  • UW
    United Way of Central Florida Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $216k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • KC
    Kiwanis Club of the Citrus Center Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +13% · 85% of their budget
  • HF
    Heartland for Children Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +2%
  • CF
    Christ for Life Ministry
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

2
La Plata Youth Services

La Plata Youth Services, Inc. supports and advocates for youth facing challenges in school, home and court.

Crime & Legal
3
Partnership for Children

To provide therapeutic care and support for the safe and healthy development of children and families.

Human Services
4
Lighthouse Central Florida Inc

Charting a course for living, learning, and earning with vision loss.

Human Services
5
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
6
Central Florida Development Council Inc

Grow an economy based on high-skill, high-wage sustainable businesses. we focus on business recruitment and expansion, business advocacy, facilitating collaborative partnerships and advancing strategic initiatives in central florida's polk…

7
Coronanorco Family Ymca

The y works to strengthen our community through programming that helps develop members by concentrating on nurturing the potential of every child, teen and adult. the y has three areas of focus- youth development, healthy living, and…

Human Services
8
Yuba River Charter School

Yuba River Charter School provides K-8 public Waldorf education that nurtures the physical, emotional and intellectual capacities of the child through a developmentally appropriate curriculum. YRCS brings forth the academic, social,…

Education
9
Winona Family Ymca Inc

The winona family ymca is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. we are dedicated to building strong kids, strong families and strong…

10
Hopewell Valley Young Men's Christian Association

To build a healthy spirit, mind and body through programs which promote good health, strong families, youth leadership and community development.

Human Services
11
Polk County School Readiness Coalition Inc

We will lead community efforts in supporting the success of children.

Education
12
Boys & Girls Club of Pbc

The mission of the boys & girls club of palm beach county is to inspire and assist all young people, especially those who need them most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of West Central Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Christ for Life Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#6#23#15#19#21
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%54%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,533

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $377,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOOK TRAILS — $284,200 · OtherBOOK TRAILSSTEAMBOAT ADAPTIVE RECREATIONAL SPORTS (STARS) — $279,079 · OtherSTEAMBOAT ADAPTIVE RECREATIONAL SPORTS (STARS)PEACE RIVER CENTER — $192,820 · OtherPEACE RIVER CENTERYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $185,700 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST CENTRAL …TREAD OF PIONERS MUSEUM — $90,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY — $82,200 · Other+20 more — $609,573 · Other+20 moreROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS — $965,188 · Youth DevelopmentROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPSHeartland for Children Inc — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentChrist for Life Ministry — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentTOP BUTTONS INC — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAKELAND VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC — $212,206 · HealthLAKELAND V…Good Shepherd Hospice Inc — $168,351 · HealthGood Sheph…Integrate Health Inc — $50,000 · HealthIntegrate …ACHIEVEMENT ACADEMY INC — $158,240 · EducationPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY — $95,200 · EducationPATHWAYS TOGO INC — $82,200 · EducationLEARNING RESOURCE CENTER OF POLK COUNTY INC — $32,805 · EducationYampa Valley Autism Program — $295,000 · Human ServicesUnited Way of Central Florida Inc — $216,200 · PhilanthropyYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · PhilanthropyYAMPATIKA — $132,200 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE YAMPA INC — $7,000 · Environment
Other$2,100,772Youth Development$1,105,188Health$430,557Education$368,445Human Services$295,000Philanthropy$246,200Environment$139,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS — $965,188 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetYampa Valley Autism Program — $295,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetUnited Way of Central Florida Inc — $216,200 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLAKELAND VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC — $212,206 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $185,700 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetGood Shepherd Hospice Inc — $168,351 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetACHIEVEMENT ACADEMY INC — $158,240 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetYAMPATIKA — $132,200 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY — $95,200 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetPATHWAYS TOGO INC — $82,200 over 6y, 37% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY — $82,200 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetTAMPA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND INC — $67,200 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCENTRAL FLORIDA SPEECH & HEARING CENTER INC — $64,799 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetKiwanis Club of the Citrus Center Foundation Inc — $60,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetHeartland for Children Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF GREATER MANASSAS PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetIntegrate Health Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChrist for Life Ministry — $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $41,374 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTOP BUTTONS INC — $40,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetFLORIDA DANCE THEATRE INC — $37,725 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetLEARNING RESOURCE CENTER OF POLK COUNTY INC — $32,805 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNIVAS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetBECAUSE I SAID I WOULD — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP FIRE USA SUNSHINE COUNCIL INC — $14,200 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetRow LA — $12,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetLAKELAND KIWANIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetFLORIDA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $8,075 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE YAMPA INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Publix Super Markets Charities IncFL30.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Givewell Community Foundation Inc · George Jenkins Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Florida Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Glenn W & Hazelle Paxson Morrison Foundation Inc · Harrell Family Charities Inc · Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · Clark Family Foundation Inc · The Simmons Foundation · Lakeland Area Chamber Foundation · Lola Mann Memorial Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Iron Horse Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Community of Hope1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Iron Horse Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Iron Horse Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph