Skip to content

· Private foundation

Involve Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$23kEducation$19kHuman Services$15kFood & Nutrition$10kYouth Development$1kCrime & Legal$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$155k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASIA SOCIETY TEXAS CENTER$3,000
JOINT CHINESE COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON SCHOLARSHIPS INC$2,000
CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 16%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 16%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 16%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 16%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$65k · 9 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$65k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+55%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ASIA SOCIETY TEXAS CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +162%
  • TJ
    THE JOINT CHINESE COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON SCHOLARSHIPS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +11%
  • CC
    CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +55%
  • NW
    NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECTS
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • AN
    A NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hcu Education Services
Health
2
Asian American Art & Culture Initiative

Asian American Art & Culture Initiative is an organization promotes Asian art, culture and history through various programs, such as exhibition, contemporary art work and history/art workshops.

Arts & Culture
3
Asian Chamber Foundation

The Asian Chamber Foundation provides opportunities of educational programming and funding support for the Asian community in economic growth and resiliency. We have a long standing impact since 1995 with scholarships and now expanded to…

Education
4
Tx Performing Chinese Arts
—
5
Hua Xia Education Foundation
Education
6
Center for Advanced China Research
—
7
Japanese Festival of Houston Inc

Introduce the public to and educate the public on japanese culture

Arts & Culture
8
Chinese Seniors Association of Houston Inc
—
9
World Affairs Council of South Texas

Education

International
10
Houston Health Foundation

Houston health foundation (hhf) has the mission of creating private/public partnerships for sustainable health and wellness initiatives and programs in our communities.

Philanthropy
11
Save Cantonese

Save Cantonese is an international movement that sustains and celebrates Cantonese language and culture. We have three Strategic Aims: a) protect and strengthen educational and research infrastructure for the Cantonese language, b) affirm…

Arts & Culture
12
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation of America (Sjtufa)
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Taiwan University Academic Development Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JCCAA: $9,000 · OtherJCCAAThe Houston Food Bank: $9,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankFRIENDS AND FAMILIES OF ASIANS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $3,000 · OtherFRIENDS AND FAMILIES OF ASIANS WITH SPECI…Houston A Challenge: $2,000 · OtherHouston A ChallengeNEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECTS: $1,000 · OtherHOUSTON CHINESE YOUTH CAMP: $1,000 · OtherTHE JOINT CHINESE COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON SCHOLARSHIPS INC: $12,000 · EducationTHE JOINT CHINESE COLLEGE AL…NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationNATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY A…DISCOVERU: $1,000 · EducationDISCOVERUASIA SOCIETY TEXAS CENTER: $13,500 · Arts & CultureASIA SOCIETY TEXAS CEN…CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesCHINESE COMMUNITY …FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $1,000 · Food & NutritionA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT: $1,000 · Health
Other$25,000Education$17,000Arts & Culture$13,500Human Services$11,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASIA SOCIETY TEXAS CENTER: $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOINT CHINESE COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON SCHOLARSHIPS INC: $12,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetCHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHouston A Challenge: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Involve Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Involve Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Involve Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Involve Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Involve’s filings →

    More from the funding graph