Skip to content

· Private foundation

Intrepid Philanthropy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$620k
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$4.4MPhilanthropy$609kHealth$398kCivil Rights$163kArts & Culture$106kScience & Tech$105kCrime & Legal$96kEnvironment$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $375k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$714k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION$125,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$50,000
BREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY$25,000
TEACHING WELL INC$20,000
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF COTATI-ROHNERT PARK$20,000
COLLEGE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$20,000
CASTRO VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$20,000
ALBANY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$20,000
FRANKLIN-MCKINLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
CENTRAL PARK ELEMENTARY PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION (PTA)$20,000
THE MARSHALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION (PTA)$20,000
OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ELIZABETH PEABODY HOUSE: $5k → 8%AYNI INSTITUTE INC: $2k → 16%ALTERNATIVE FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 9%SOUTHERN OREGON FRIENDS OF HOSPICE: $5k → 13%COMMUNITY READY CORPS: $2k → 24%MIND AND LIFE INSTITUTE: $3k → 8%MY NEW RED SHOES: $3k → 7%MY NEW RED SHOES: $3k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $5k → 10%CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER INC: $5k → 17%CRIME VICTIM TREATMENT CENTER INC: $5k → 17%CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER INC: $5k → 17%CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER INC: $3k → 17%CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER INC: $3k → 17%CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER INC: $3k → 17%CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER INC: $3k → 17%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%K TO COLLEGE: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
AR
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Intrepid Philanthropy Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 80%.

Intrepid Philanthropy Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 95 repeat orgs$728k to everyone else

95 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 70 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
77

Total granted

$4.8M
$445k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+30%

Still filing today

64%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $283k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $281k · revenue +74%
  • SS
    SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $279k · revenue +128%
  • KA
    KHAN ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $150k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • SS
    SMALL SCHOOLS FOR EQUITY
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -57%
  • FA
    FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • CE
    CHINESE EDUCATION CENTER SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Innovate Public Schools

Build the parent and community demand for world-class public schools, and to accelerate the growth of these schools, particularly for low-income students, students of colors, and students with special needs.

Philanthropy
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
4
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
5
The Language Academy of Sacramento

The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…

Education
6
Public Advocates Inc

For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…

—
7
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
8
Elite Public Schools

To ensure students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning experiences designed to make them active…

Education
9
Leadership Public Schools

Our mission is to create inclusive, empowering, and college-preparatory experiences that equip students to succeed in college, career, and as leaders in their communities.

Education
10
Alternative Schools Inc

To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.

Education
11
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
12
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Education for Change; the most unlike its peers is Kairos Academies Vanguard. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

129 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 129 of the 195 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
125/129
Grantees still filing
84/129
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION: $300,000 · OtherSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIONRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $150,000 · OtherOAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $130,000 · OtherDAVIS JT UNIF SCHOOL DIST: $108,832 · OtherKRAUSE CENTER FOR INNOVATION: $100,000 · Other+106 more: $2,068,762 · Other+106 moreBREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY: $281,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEYSPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $279,238 · EducationSPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLSNEW TEACHER CENTER: $275,000 · EducationNEW TEACHER CENTERTeach for America Inc: $175,000 · EducationTeach for America IncKHAN ACADEMY INC: $150,000 · EducationKHAN ACADEMY INCTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $145,844 · EducationTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDDONORSCHOOSEORG: $98,834 · EducationEDUCATION FOR CHANGE: $80,000 · Education+37 more: $647,440 · Education+37 morePHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $470,000 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROP…LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $132,000 · PhilanthropyLOS ALTOS M…EAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION: $28,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $70,000 · HealthTrust Women Foundation Inc: $60,000 · HealthQUEENS OF THE CASTRO INC: $53,000 · HealthMEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE: $45,000 · HealthVOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC: $17,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC: $15,000 · HealthTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $10,000 · HealthST LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER: $10,000 · HealthACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Health+4 more: $6,500 · HealthJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $60,000 · Civil RightsPhysicians For Reproductive Health: $31,000 · Civil RightsTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC: $14,500 · Civil RightsMovimiento Cosecha Support Network: $10,000 · Civil RightsWOMEN'S LAW PROJECT: $10,000 · Civil Rights+2 more: $2,000 · Civil RightsFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $27,500 · Arts & CulturePLAYGROUND: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCrime Victims Treatment Center Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesELIZABETH PEABODY HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5,000 · Human ServicesMBOLDEN CHANGE: $5,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN OREGON FRIENDS OF HOSPICE: $5,000 · Human ServicesALTERNATIVE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesK TO COLLEGE DBA SUPPLYBANKORG: $2,500 · Human ServicesMIND & LIFE INSTITUTE: $2,500 · Human ServicesSISTERSONG INC: $2,500 · Human Services+3 more: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$2,857,594Education$2,132,356Philanthropy$631,000Health$296,500Civil Rights$127,500Arts & Culture$67,500Human Services$61,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $470,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY: $281,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetSPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $279,238 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetNEW TEACHER CENTER: $275,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $175,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $145,844 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $132,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $98,834 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATION FOR CHANGE: $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetHAYWARD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetQUEENS OF THE CASTRO INC: $53,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetMINDFUL SCHOOLS: $47,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE: $45,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PARENTS & TEACHERS OF BUENA VISTA HORACE MANN: $44,686 over 3y, 18% of budgetMILLS COLLEGE: $41,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $38,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPhysicians For Reproductive Health: $31,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetYU MING CHARTER SCHOOL: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetLOS AMIGOS DE MANZANITA SEED: $30,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF MONTEREY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF ALAMEDA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBerkeley High School Development Group: $30,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetSan Leandro Education Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetLODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES CORPORATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSchool of Environmental Leadership: $30,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetENVISION EDUCATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDolores Huerta Elementary PTA: $30,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetMULTIPLIER: $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $27,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSMALL SCHOOLS FOR EQUITY: $25,260 over 1y, 11% of budgetCrime Victims Treatment Center Inc: $25,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOakland Literacy Coalition Inc: $22,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetThe Teaching Well Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEducation Foundation of Cotati & Rohnert Park: $20,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetKITCHEN TABLE ADVISORS: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds NEW TEACHER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOR CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds Guttmacher Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JANE'S DUE PROCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds HAYWARD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Trust Women Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS OF THE CASTRO INC ↗
  • Who funds MINDFUL SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENTS & TEACHERS OF BUENA VISTA HORACE MANN ↗
  • Who funds MILLS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds NORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds Physicians For Reproductive Health ↗
  • Who funds YU MING CHARTER SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA38.7× affinity49 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The Family Giving Tree · Silicon Schools Fund Inc · Quest Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Golden State Community Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Kenneth Rainin Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Intrepid Philanthropy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Intrepid Philanthropy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • New Haven Reads Community Book Bank Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Worcester County Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Southern Oregon Friends of Hospice: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Intrepid Philanthropy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Intrepid Philanthropy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 195 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Intrepid Philanthropy’s filings →

More from the funding graph