Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Family Giving Tree

By inspiring community kindness, generosity, and volunteerism.

$2.4M
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $232,076 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,406,863 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,174,787 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $138k
$27,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE EAST PALO ALTO$88,476
ARRIBA JUNTOS$50,000
PALO ALTO COMMUNITY CHILD CARE$34,950
SAN FRANCISCO CITY IMPACT$27,500
COMMUNITY UNITED SAN JOSE - ALMA YOUTH CENTER$13,000
YUPP ORG$10,200
EAST SIDE HEROES$7,950
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY UNITED SAN JOSE - ALMA YOUTH CENTER: $13k → 8%PALO ALTO COMMUNITY CHILD CARE: $35k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
2
Parents for Public Schools of San Francisco

PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.

3
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
4
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
5
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
6
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
7
Community Action Marin

We make it possible for people in marin to achieve well-being by providing the vital services they need. together, we break down the barriers that get in the way of fair and lasting change in service to better outcomes for all.

Human Services
8
Faces Sf

Our mission is to nurture, teach and empower children and families to transform their lives by providing critical assistance to low-income families with early childhood development, workforce training, school-age enrichment, and family…

Education
9
El Concilio California

Empowering diverse communities in california's central valley.

Human Services
10
Edgewood Center for Children and Families

To be the place to begin for all bay area children, youth and families who need mental health, social services and academic support. edgewood is the premier provider of a full continuum of behavioral health services that transform the…

Health
11
Sacred Heart Community Service

Our mission is to build a community free from poverty by creating hope, opportunity, and action. we provide essential services, work together to improve our lives, organize for justice, and inspire our community to love, serve, and share.

Human Services
12
Family Supportive Housing Inc

Family supportive housing, inc. is committed to the entire family and encourages families to stay intact while addressing their needs for food, shelter, education, and employment. the organization provides shelter, housing opportunities…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Connections Centers and the most unlike its peers is International Children Assistance Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%4%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr12%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr17%40%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr12%22%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%4/205
the rest of the field
12%
4,734/39,434

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
105/111
Grantees still filing
73/111
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ONE EAST PALO ALTO — $88,476 · EducationONE EAST PALO ALTOArriba Juntos — $50,000 · EmploymentArriba JuntosPALO ALTO COMMUNITY CHILD CARE — $34,950 · Human ServicesPALO ALTO COMMUNITY CHI…HAPPY HOUSE — $13,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY HOUSESan Francisco City Impact — $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentSan Francisco City…YOUTH UTILIZING POWER AND PRAISE ORGANIZATION — $10,200 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH UTILIZING PO…EAST SIDE HEROES — $7,950 · Other
Education$88,476Employment$50,000Human Services$47,950Youth Development$37,700Other$7,950

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetONE EAST PALO ALTO — $88,476 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetArriba Juntos — $50,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetPALO ALTO COMMUNITY CHILD CARE — $34,950 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSan Francisco City Impact — $27,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHAPPY HOUSE — $13,000 over 3y, 63% of budgetYOUTH UTILIZING POWER AND PRAISE ORGANIZATION — $10,200 over 7y, 18% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Second Harvest of Silicon ValleyCA76× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Valley Health Foundation (Vhf) · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Tipping Point Community

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Family Giving Tree funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Family Giving Tree?

    Find your warmest path to The Family Giving Tree through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2.5M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph