Skip to content
International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades District Council #14 at a glance

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades District Council #14

The council is a labor organization which coordinates labor matters and administers to labor problems of members and local unions under the council's jurisdiction.

$187k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$804kCivil Rights$511kMembership Benefit$244kYouth Development$73kCommunity Improvement$55kHealth$37kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kPhilanthropy$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $103,845, the rows itemized in this filing. The $187,103 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $83,258 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $84k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR$26,500
PATCH FOUNDATION$16,500
EQUALITY ILLINOIS$11,000
FINISHING INDUSTRIES DISASTER RELIEF FUND$10,000
ILLINOIS AFL-CIO R&E$10,000
ARISE CHICAGO$10,000
MIDWEST WALL AND CEILING CONTRACTORS$7,125
FCA OF CHICAGO$6,720
UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KENNETH RIGMAIDEN TESTIMONIAL DINNER COMMITTEE: $25k → 7%FINISHING INDUSTRIES DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $10k → 7%TRI COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT FUND: $300k → 8%MIDWEST WALL AND CEILING CONTRACTORS: $7k → 8%ILLINOIS AFL-CIO R&E: $10k → 11%CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE: $5k → 14%AWCI CONSTRUCTION DIMENSIONS: $8k → 4%FINISHING INDUSTRIES DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $20k → 6%PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION: $37k → 8%TRI COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT FUND: $200k → 8%MIDWEST WALL AND CEILING CONTRACTORS: $6k → 8%ILLINOIS AFL-CIO: $6k → 11%CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE: $5k → 14%PATCH FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%TRI COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT FUND: $200k → 8%MIDWEST WALL AND CEILING CONTRACTORS: $5k → 8%ARISE CHICAGO: $10k → 14%PATCH FOUNDATION: $17k → 6%ARISE CHICAGO: $10k → 14%PATCH FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%FCA OF CHICAGO: $8k → 14%PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES FOR CHILDRENS HOPE FOUNDATION: $12k → 6%FCA OF CHICAGO: $8k → 14%PATCH FOUNDATION: $11k → 6%FCA OF CHICAGO: $7k → 14%FCA OF CHICAGO: $7k → 14%FCA OF CHICAGO: $7k → 14%ARISE CHICAGO: $10k → 14%ARISE CHICAGO: $10k → 14%ARISE CHICAGO: $10k → 14%ARISE CHICAGO: $10k → 14%ARISE CHICAGO: $10k → 14%UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $6k → 14%UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $6k → 14%UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $6k → 14%VOTE YES FOR WORKERS RIGHTS: $500k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $30k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $29k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $28k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $27k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $27k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $27k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $27k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $25k → 14%MOTHER JONES STATUE FUND: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 8 repeat orgs$637k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$606k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    TRI-COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT FUND
    3× · 2021–2023 · $700k · revenue +3% · 43% of their budget
  • CF
    CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCIL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $219k · revenue +6%
  • ARISE CHICAGO
    7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +372%

Funded once

  • VY
    VOTE YES FOR WORKERS RIGHTS
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • TP
    THE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $37k · revenue +21%
  • IU
    INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fca of Illinois

A union painting, glazing, and drywall taping contractors association dedicated to improving the industry through negotiating and implementing a collective bargaining agreement, promoting safety, education, and training to its members,…

Community Improvement
2
West Central Building and Construction Trades Council

Betterment of the wage earners working condition

Community Improvement
3
Laborers' Int'l Union of North America District Council of Chicago

To promote unity of action in dealing with employers and to coordinate and consolidate the activities of its various affiliated local unions so they can work in a harmonious and united way.

—
4
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
5
Downstate Illinios Laborers District Cou

To organize workers, negotiate wages and benefit contracts for construction craft laborers in the local construction industry, secure pratical work hours, improve working conditions, and secure othe economical benefits through…

—
6
Fca International

Fca international is the only international business league devoted exclusively to serving the unique needs of united states and canadian signatory contractors in the drywall finishing, glass and glazing, industrial coating, flooring,…

—
7
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
8
Illinois Pipe Trades Association

To promote, protect, and serve the member unions by establishing and maintaining minimum wage standards, protecting members from unjust competition, and overseeing labor agreements within the state of illinois.

—
9
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
10
International Union of Operating Engineers 150

Labor organization representing members in a variety of industries including construction, construction material production, steel mill services/slag processing, landscaping and many others principally in illinois, indiana and iowa. the…

—
11
Iron Workers District Council of Chicago and Vicinity

Organize workers for advancement

—
12
Chicagoland Associated General Contractors

To deliver exceptional value to our members through industry leadership, superior services, and innovative programs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations; the most unlike its peers is Illinois Afl-Cio Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VOTE YES FOR WORKERS RIGHTS: $500,000 · OtherVOTE YES FOR WORKERS RIGHTSCHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCIL: $218,900 · OtherCHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COU…+8 more: $106,825 · Other+8 moreTRI-COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT FUND: $700,000 · Community ImprovementTRI-COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT FUNDFinishing Contractors Association of Chicago: $37,265 · Community ImprovementPAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES FOR CHILDREN'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $73,261 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $24,000 · PhilanthropyEQUALITY ILLINOIS: $11,000 · PhilanthropyARISE CHICAGO: $70,000 · EmploymentCHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE: $10,000 · EmploymentTHE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC: $37,000 · Health
Other$825,725Community Improvement$737,265Philanthropy$108,261Employment$80,000Health$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRI-COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT FUND: $700,000 over 3y, 43% of budgetCHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCIL: $218,900 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES FOR CHILDREN'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $73,261 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetARISE CHICAGO: $70,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetFinishing Contractors Association of Chicago: $37,265 over 5y, 10% of budgetTHE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC: $37,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMidwest Wall and Ceiling Contractors NFP: $18,325 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetEQUALITY ILLINOIS: $11,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFINISHING CONTRACTORS INDUSTRY FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 65% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE WALL AND CEILING INDUSTRY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Union o…Amazonsmile Foundation
International Union of Operating Engineers Local No 399IL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Union of Operating Engineers Local No 399 · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades District Council #14 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades District Council #14. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades District Council #14’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home