Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 481

Labor union

$311k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 481’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $213,942 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $310,876 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $96,934 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $190k
$10,442
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA SPORTS CORPORATION$25,000
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$25,000
INDIANAPOLIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$25,000
TOP NOTCH OF INDIANA$20,000
THE MRA FOUNDATION$15,000
INDIANA STATE AFL-CIO$15,000
ELECTRICAL WORKERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND$15,000
LONG ELECTRIC CO INC$10,442
IBEW LOCAL 481 RETIREES FUND$10,000
HOOSIER WOMEN FORWARD$10,000
HUNGER INC$10,000
IBEW UNITY FUND$10,000
INDIANA CAREERS IN CONSTRUCTION$8,500
ELECTRICAL WORKERS INDIANAPOLIS$7,500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL INDIANA$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ELECTRICAL WORKERS INDIANAPOLIS: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$1.1M
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+55%

Still filing today

54%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS
    7× · 2017–2025 · $153k · revenue +25%
  • IS
    INDIANA SPORTS CORPORATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +308%
  • CI
    CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PROGRESS COUNCIL OF INDIANA INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $102k · revenue +218%

Funded once

  • HS
    Hamilton Southeastern School Corp
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • PT
    PERRY TOWNSHIP SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • IP
    INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +61%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Technology Student Association
Education
2
Indianapolis Junior Golf Foundation
3
Indiana High School Athletic Association

Supervise high school athletic competition in indiana

Recreation & Sports
4
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

5
Central Indiana Independent Electrical Contractors Inc

The mission of iec is to enhance the independent electrical contractor's success by developing a professional workforce, communicating clearly with government, promoting ethical business practices, and providing leadership for the…

Community Improvement
6
Indiana Constructors Inc

Promote the common business and regulatory interest of individuals, organizations, associations, and corporations associated with the indiana construction industry and works to improve the business conditions in the indiana construction…

Community Improvement
7
Ymca Foundation of Greater Indianapolis
8
Indiana Golf Association Inc

To promote the sport of golf.

9
Indiana University Health Morgan Inc
10
Indiana Interscholastic Athletic

The mission of the indiana interscholastic athletic administrator's association is to provide a multitude of quality opportunities for indiana student-athletes. toward that aim, the iiaaa will promote leadership and education among…

Community Improvement
11
Indy Youth Sports Inc

IYS has provided sports to over 1200 kids in the inner city of Indianapolis, IN free of charge. We also have taken middle school to camps at IU Bloomington and provided food.

12
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%14%<5yr14%14%5–10yr16%19%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr27%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%13%<5yr14%5%5–10yr16%4%10–20yr14%5%20–35yr10%44%35–55yr27%28%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
12%
1,463/12,621

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IBEW PAC EDUCATION FUND — $385,000 · OtherIBEW PAC EDUCATION FUNDINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS — $152,540 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERSCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PROGRESS COUNCIL OF INDIANA INC — $101,500 · OtherCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PROGRESS COUNCIL OF INDIANA INCELECTRICAL WORKERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND — $70,000 · OtherELECTRICAL WORKERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND+19 more — $286,193 · Other+19 moreINDIANA SPORTS CORPORATION — $120,000 · Recreation & SportsINDIANA SP…Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra Foundation Inc — $75,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Diabetes Association — $25,000 · HealthST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $3,300 · HealthINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · EducationFRANKLIN TOWNSHIP EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · EducationLEAGUE OF MIRACLES INC — $10,550 · Youth DevelopmentGOTR OF HAMILTON COUNTY — $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentINDIANA CAREERS IN CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATION INC — $8,500 · Community Improvement
Other$995,233Recreation & Sports$120,000Arts & Culture$75,000Health$28,300Education$21,000Youth Development$18,550Community Improvement$8,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS — $152,540 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA SPORTS CORPORATION — $120,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PROGRESS COUNCIL OF INDIANA INC — $101,500 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetIndianapolis Symphony Orchestra Foundation Inc — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetELECTRICAL WORKERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND — $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHoosier Heartland Area Labor Federation AFL-CIO — $31,970 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetIAC SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $16,500 over 3y, 47% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFranklin Township Youth Football Club Inc — $12,034 over 1y, 11% of budgetLEAGUE OF MIRACLES INC — $10,550 over 1y, 13% of budgetHUNGER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetINDIANA CAREERS IN CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATION INC — $8,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS SOAP BOX DERBY ASSOCIATION INC — $5,180 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $3,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Indianapolis Foundation IncIN15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 481 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph